Skip to content

Decision details

CITB contract with Manor and Castle Development Trust

Decision Maker: Head of Libraries and Community Services

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: No

Is subject to call in?: No

Purpose:

This report seeks approval from the Head of libraries and Community services for

 

           SCC to use part of the CITB funding to enter into a Grant agreement with Manor and Castle Development Trust(MCDT) in order to for MCDT to set up a CSCS test center.

 

 

           SCC to use part of the CITB funding to enter into a further agreement with MCDT to carry out assessments of potential programme participants and recruit young people to the programme.

Decision:

It is recommended that the Head of Libraries and Community services with consultation from the Director of Legal and Compliance approve the following:

 

 

a)         SCC to use part of the CITB funding to enter into a Grant agreement with Manor and Castle Development Trust (MCDT) in order to for MCDT to set up a CSCS test center.

 

b)         SCC to use part of the CITB funding to enter into a further grant agreement with MCDT to carry out assessments of potential programme participants and recruit young people to the programme.

 

 

 

The Head of Libraries and Community services will be expected to also consult with the Director of Legal and Compliance before carrying out the recommendations as described in the above paragraphs (a) and (b) as input/comments from a legal perspective shall be considered in each of such recommendations.

Reasons for the decision:

The purpose of the Programme is to directly support Sheffield residents to find and sustain employment.

This approach will provide 650 of Sheffield’s residents with the opportunity to access employer led training within the construction sector with a minimum of 250 participants gaining sustainable employment

Alternative options considered:

Alternative option 1 - In house Council delivery

 

This option is not recommended as the Council is not in the position to deliver the outcomes as described in this report

 

Alternative option 2 - Not to fund the Programme

 

This option is not recommended.  If the Council did not fund this programme, activity would not be delivered and outcomes for this project will not be achieved

Publication date: 06/03/2019

Date of decision: 06/03/2019

Accompanying Documents: