Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Apologies for Absence
Additional documents:
Minutes:
1.1
|
Apologies for absence were
received from Councillors David Baker, Mike Drabble, Alan Law,
Shaffaq Mohammed, Kaltum Rivers and Jack Scott.
|
|
|
|
2. |
Declarations of Interest PDF 88 KB
Members to declare any
interests they have in the business to be considered at the
meeting.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
2.1
|
Councillor Angela Argenzio declared a personal
interest in agenda item 6 – Notice of Motion regarding
Recognising Palestine As A Full State – on the grounds of
being a Trustee of Sheffield City of Sanctuary.
|
|
|
|
3. |
Public Questions and Petitions and Other Communications
To receive any questions or
petitions from the public, or communications submitted by the Lord
Mayor or the Chief Executive and to pass such resolutions thereon
as the Council Procedure Rules permit and as may be deemed
expedient.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
3.1
|
Petitions
|
|
|
3.1.1
|
Petition Objecting to the Poor
Bus Service Between Totley and the City
Centre
|
|
|
|
The Council received a petition
containing 53 signatures, objecting to the poor bus service between
Totley and the City Centre.
|
|
|
|
Representations on behalf of
the petitioners were made by Sudir
Narraidoo who said that the matter had
also been raised with the operator First Bus. He explained that
Totley had a population which included
a large number of older people who relied upon buses and it was
frustrating that buses were late or did not arrive and people were
left stranded or buses were too full to take more passengers. The
Council was urged to confront First Bus about these concerns and it
was also pointed out that people should be encouraged to use buses
rather than cars due to concerns regarding climate change and a
comment was made on the state of the public transport
system.
|
|
|
|
The Council referred the
petition to Councillor Bob Johnson, the Cabinet Member for
Transport and Development and Councillor Johnson responded to the
petition, together with two other petitions relating to bus
services (see below).
|
|
|
3.1.2
|
Petition Requesting the South
Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive to Save the No. 56 Bus
Service, Linking Gleadless Valley and
Heeley to the City Centre
|
|
|
|
The Council received a petition
containing 449 signatures, requesting the SYPTE to save the No. 56
bus service, linking Gleadless Valley
and Heeley to the City Centre.
|
|
|
|
Representations on behalf of
the petitioners were made by Nadia Jama (see below).
|
|
|
|
The Council referred the
petition to Councillor Bob Johnson, the Cabinet Member for
Transport and Development and Councillor Johnson responded to the
petition, together with two other petitions relating to bus
services (see below).
|
|
|
3.1.3
|
Petition Requesting the South
Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority to Save the No. 31 Bus
Service
|
|
|
|
The Council received a petition
containing 138 signatures, requesting the South Yorkshire Passenger
Transport Authority to save the No. 31 bus service.
|
|
|
|
Representations on behalf of
the petitioners and in respect of the No.31 and No.56 Bus Services
were made by Nadia Jama. The No. 31 service connected Walkley with Hillsborough but was cancelled as at
31 August, particularly affecting people living between
Langsett Road and South Road and
including older people that may find it difficult to get up and
down hill to go to the doctors, friends or local shops. The Council
was urged to lobby the South Yorkshire Passenger Transport
Authority regarding this matter and to help reinstate the bus
services.
|
|
|
|
Similar problems had been
experienced in relation to other bus services with most places
having been affected by alterations to routes or the cancellation
of bus services. The petitioners called upon the Cabinet Member to
work with Louise Haig MP with regard to the introduction of bus
franchising by the City Region Mayor. She commented that change was
needed if there was to be a bus service which was led by
peoples’ needs, rather than profit.
|
|
|
|
The Council referred the
petition to Councillor Bob ...
view the full minutes text for item 3.
|
|
4. |
Urgent Item of Business - Notice of Motion Regarding "Proroguing of Parliament"
Additional documents:
Minutes:
4.1
|
The Lord Mayor (Councillor Tony Downing)
announced the proposal that an urgent item of business be
considered at this point in the proceedings. Council Procedure Rule
26 states that “An item of business may be considered at a
meeting of the Council as a matter of urgency, where it has not
been possible to give five clear working days’ notice, on the
recommendation of the Chair, but the reason for such urgency must
be recorded in the minutes. Any non-confidential or non-exempt
report relating to such item must be made available for public
inspection once it has been issued.”.
|
|
|
4.2
|
The Leader of the Council (Councillor Julie
Dore) had requested that the Council considers an additional Notice
of Motion regarding the Proroguing of Parliament, following the
Prime Minister’s decision made after the Council agenda had
been published in the previous week. In view of the nature and
timing of the issue, the Lord Mayor stated that he was satisfied
that there were clear reasons for taking the Notice of Motion as an
urgent item of business.
|
|
|
4.3
|
The proposed Motion was circulated to all
Members of the Council on 3rd September 2019 and was
published on the Council’s website. Copies of the Motion were
made available in the Council Chamber and Public Gallery.
|
|
|
4.4
|
It was moved by Councillor Julie Dore, and
seconded by Councillor Penny Baker, that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) profoundly opposes
the decision made by the Prime Minister last week to prorogue
Parliament, believes that this is a cynical tactic attempting to
facilitate a no-deal Brexit and is an affront to our parliamentary
democracy;
(b) believes this is
compounded by the Rt. Hon. Michael Gove MP refusing to rule out the
Government ignoring legislation that could be passed by Parliament
and believes this would be an unprecedented move and undermine the
principle of parliamentary sovereignty;
(c) urges all
Members of Parliament – from all parties – to work
together in the national interest to stop the devastating effects
of a reckless, divisive and destructive no-deal Brexit; and
(d) asks that a copy of this motion is sent to all
Sheffield Members of Parliament and the Prime Minister to reverse
this appalling decision.
|
|
|
4.5
|
After contributions from eight other Members,
and following a right of reply from Councillor Julie Dore, the
Motion was put to the vote and carried as follows:-
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED: That this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) profoundly opposes
the decision made by the Prime Minister last week to prorogue
Parliament, believes that this is a cynical tactic attempting to
facilitate a no-deal Brexit and is an affront to our parliamentary
democracy;
|
|
|
|
(b) believes this is
compounded by the Rt. Hon. Michael Gove MP refusing to rule out the
Government ignoring legislation that could be passed by Parliament
and believes this would be an unprecedented move and undermine the
principle of parliamentary sovereignty;
(c) urges all
Members of Parliament – from all parties – to work
together in the national interest to stop the devastating effects
of ...
view the full minutes text for item 4.
|
|
5. |
Members' Questions PDF 392 KB
4.1 Questions relating
to urgent business – Council Procedure Rule 16.6(ii).
4.2 Supplementary
questions on written questions submitted at this meeting –
Council Procedure Rule 16.4.
4.3 Questions on the
discharge of the functions of the South Yorkshire Joint Authorities
for Fire and Rescue and Pensions – Section 41 of the Local
Government Act 1985 – Council Procedure Rule
16.6(i).
(NB. Minutes of recent meetings of the two South Yorkshire Joint
Authorities have been made available to all Members of the Council
via the following link -
http://democracy.sheffield.gov.uk/ecCatDisplay.aspx?sch=doc&cat=13165&path=0)
Additional documents:
Minutes:
5.1
|
Urgent Business
|
|
|
|
There were no questions relating to urgent
business under the provisions of Council Procedure Rule
16.6(ii).
|
|
|
5.2
|
Written Questions
|
|
|
|
A schedule of questions to Cabinet Members,
submitted in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 16, and which
contained written answers, was circulated. Supplementary questions, under the provisions of
Council Procedure Rule 16.4, were asked and were answered by the
appropriate Cabinet Members until the expiry of the 30 minute time
limit for Members’ Questions (in accordance with Council
Procedure Rule 16.7).
|
|
|
5.3
|
South Yorkshire Joint Authorities
|
|
|
|
Questions relating to the discharge of the
functions of the South Yorkshire Joint Authorities for Fire and
Rescue and Pensions (under the provisions of Council Procedure Rule
16.6(i) were not able to be asked
before the expiry of the 30 minute time limit for Members’
Questions (in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 16.7).
|
|
|
|
6. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "Recognising Palestine as a Full State" - Given By Councillor Julie Dore And To Be Seconded By Councillor Neale Gibson
That this Council:-
(a) believes that there must be recognition of the
rights of Palestinians to their own state, and thanks the
petitioners for bringing this important issue to Full Council in
July;
(b) notes that 138
nations of the UN, out of 193 (71.5%), recognise Palestine as a
state and in 2012 the UN General Assembly moved to do so - though
this was blocked from full UN membership by the Security
Council;
(c) notes that the
current UK Government appears to have no intention of recognising
Palestine, and notes that this is in contrast to the Labour
Party’s commitment to recognise Palestine as a full state as
part of the United Nations and under UK law;
(d) believes that the
recognition of Palestine as a state is one step towards a genuine
two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict;
(e) believes there has to be a peace process and there
has to be a right of the Palestinian people to live in peace and
security as well as the right of Israel;
(f) believes that
whilst Sheffield is just one city, it is important to make this
symbolic gesture to formally recognise Palestine as a full state,
and hope that this will increase pressure on the UK Government to
do likewise; and
(g) requests that this Motion is submitted to the
Foreign Office, the Prime Minister and the Leader of the
Opposition.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
6.1
|
RESOLVED: On the motion of Councillor Julie
Dore and seconded by Councillor Peter Rippon, that, in accordance
with Council Procedure Rule 9.1, the order of business as published
on the Council Summons be altered by taking item 6 on the agenda
(Notice of Motion Regarding “Recognising Palestine As A Full
State”) as the next item of business.
|
|
|
6.2
|
It was moved by Councillor Julie Dore, and
seconded by Councillor Adam Hurst, that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) believes that there
must be recognition of the rights of Palestinians to their own
state, and thanks the petitioners for bringing this important issue
to Full Council in July;
(b) notes that 138
nations of the UN, out of 193 (71.5%), recognise Palestine as a
state and in 2012 the UN General Assembly moved to do so - though
this was blocked from full UN membership by the Security
Council;
|
|
|
|
(c) notes that the
current UK Government appears to have no intention of recognising
Palestine, and notes that this is in contrast to the Labour
Party’s commitment to recognise Palestine as a full state as
part of the United Nations and under UK law;
(d) believes that the
recognition of Palestine as a state is one step towards a genuine
two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict;
|
|
|
|
(e) believes there has
to be a peace process and there has to be a right of the
Palestinian people to live in peace and security as well as the
right of Israel;
(f) believes that
whilst Sheffield is just one city, it is important to make this
symbolic gesture to formally recognise Palestine as a full state,
and hope that this will increase pressure on the UK Government to
do likewise; and
|
|
|
|
(g) requests that this Motion is submitted to the
Foreign Office, the Prime Minister and the Leader of the
Opposition.
|
|
|
6.3
|
Whereupon, it was moved by Councillor Joe
Otten, and seconded by Councillor Penny Baker, as an amendment,
that the Motion now submitted be amended by the
addition of new paragraphs (h) to (m) as follows:-
|
|
|
|
(h) recognises that, in 2005,
the EU monitoring centre on Racism and Xenophobia (now the EU
Agency for Fundamental Rights) adopted the following working
definition of antisemitism:
|
|
|
|
“Antisemitism is a
certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward
Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are
directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their
property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious
facilities.”
|
|
|
|
(i) notes
that the working definition has become the standard definition used
around the world;
(j) notes
that this definition has been adopted by the European Parliament,
the UK College of Policing, the US Dept
of State, the US Senate and the 31 countries comprising the
International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance;
|
|
|
|
(k) recognises
that, in 2016, the British Government also formally adopted this
working definition of antisemitism;
|
|
|
|
(l) in view
of recent controversy over the precise definition of antisemitism,
this city with its proud history of religious tolerance and the
first UK City ...
view the full minutes text for item 6.
|
|
7. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "Consulting the Public " - Given By Councillor Ian Auckland And To Be Seconded By Councillor Mohammed Mahroof
That this Council:-
(a) notes the request of the Economic and Environmental
Wellbeing Scrutiny and Policy Development Committee that the
consultation period in respect of proposals for a clean air zone be
extended beyond August, was declined by the Cabinet Member;
(b) in contrast,
welcomes the decision of Mayor Dan Jarvis to extend the period for
consultation in respect of Bus Services, particularly noting yet
another round of damaging service reductions taking place with
effect from 1st September, and would urge especially passengers
finding their service have disappeared, to make their opinions
plain;
(c) repeats the
call (last made by the Liberal Democrat Group at the Council
meeting in February 2019) for the Council to give notice to
terminate the Sheffield Bus Partnership Agreement, as improved bus
services will be an essential requirement if the Council is to
secure cleaner, greener, safer travel, reducing the number of cars
on the road and encouraging cycling and walking;
(d) deplores the fact that the opportunities for
involvement in decision making by citizens and Members have been
much reduced by the current Administration;
(e) accepts that it is
not possible to be exactly prescriptive with regard to the time
period for consultation exercises, but agrees that major
consultations require a minimum period of 8 weeks and that 12 weeks
should be considered desirable, in the interest of Truth, Trust,
and Transparency;
(f) declares that
for the purposes of calculating the desired period for public
consultation, the month(s) of August and the Christmas and New Year
period, be disregarded;
(g) further notes that Part 2 Article 3 of the
Constitution of the Council "Citizens and the Council" makes no
reference to the Right of Citizens to be consulted, and the Council
duty to consult;
(h) notes that the duty
to consult may be prescribed by legislation specifically, or
generally under Section 149 of the Equalities Act 2010, or from the
common law duty of a public authority to act fairly, and the public
law principle of legitimate expectation; and
(i)
calls on the Director of Legal and
Governance to bring forward proposals to incorporate a "Citizens
Right to be consulted" in Article 3, and address the other
provisions in this Motion.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
7.1
|
It was moved by Councillor Ian Auckland, and
seconded by Councillor Mohammed Maroof, that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) notes the request of the
Economic and Environmental Wellbeing Scrutiny and Policy
Development Committee that the consultation period in respect of
proposals for a clean air zone be extended beyond August, was
declined by the Cabinet Member;
|
|
|
|
(b) in contrast,
welcomes the decision of Mayor Dan Jarvis to extend the period for
consultation in respect of Bus Services, particularly noting yet
another round of damaging service reductions taking place with
effect from 1st September, and would urge especially passengers
finding their service have disappeared, to make their opinions
plain;
|
|
|
|
(c) repeats the
call (last made by the Liberal Democrat Group at the Council
meeting in February 2019) for the Council to give notice to
terminate the Sheffield Bus Partnership Agreement, as improved bus
services will be an essential requirement if the Council is to
secure cleaner, greener, safer travel, reducing the number of cars
on the road and encouraging cycling and walking;
|
|
|
|
(d) deplores the fact
that the opportunities for involvement in decision making by
citizens and Members have been much reduced by the current
Administration;
(e) accepts that it is
not possible to be exactly prescriptive with regard to the time
period for consultation exercises, but agrees that major
consultations require a minimum period of 8 weeks and that 12 weeks
should be considered desirable, in the interest of Truth, Trust,
and Transparency;
|
|
|
|
(f) declares that
for the purposes of calculating the desired period for public
consultation, the month(s) of August and the Christmas and New Year
period, be disregarded;
(g) further notes that
Part 2 Article 3 of the Constitution of the Council "Citizens and
the Council" makes no reference to the Right of Citizens to be
consulted, and the Council duty to consult;
|
|
|
|
(h) notes that the duty
to consult may be prescribed by legislation specifically, or be
necessary to meet the requirements of Section 149 of the Equalities
Act 2010, or from the common law duty of a public authority to act
fairly, and the public law principle of legitimate expectation;
and
|
|
|
|
(i) calls on
the Director of Legal and Governance to bring forward proposals to
incorporate a "Citizens Right to be consulted" in Article 3, and
address the other provisions in this Motion.
|
|
|
7.1.1
|
(NOTE: With the
agreement of the Council and at the request of the mover of the
Motion (Councillor Ian Auckland), the Motion as
published on the agenda, was altered by the substitution of
the words “be necessary to meet the requirements of”
for the words “generally under” in the 2nd
line in paragraph (h).)
|
|
|
7.2
|
Whereupon, it was moved by Councillor Bob
Johnson, and seconded by Councillor Mark Jones, as an amendment,
that the Motion now submitted be amended by the deletion of all the
words after the words “That this Council”, and the
addition of the following words:-
|
|
|
|
(a) notes the success of
recent Clean Air Zone ...
view the full minutes text for item 7.
|
|
8. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "Children's Services in Sheffield Improving and Rated Good by Ofsted" - Given By Councillor Jackie Drayton And To Be Seconded By Councillor Dawn Dale
That this Council:-
(a) notes that following three weeks of inspection by
Ofsted, they have noted that ‘Children’s Services in
Sheffield are good’;
(b) notes that the
report detailed that, despite 10 years of austerity, Sheffield had
made steady progress since the last inspection in 2013, by working
through our comprehensive improvement plan, that has children and
young people at the heart of it:-
(i)
securing significant additional
corporate investment;
(ii) support from Senior Management and Leaders across
all areas of the Council and Partner Organisations; and
(iii) as noted in the report, ‘Corporate parenting
is ‘highly effective and emulates what a good parent should
be’ and that ‘the local authority sense of corporate
responsibility for children in care and care leavers is
unambiguous’ and senior leaders provide proactive and
committed corporate parenting; the report also highlights examples
of practice that ‘exemplifies excellence in corporate
parenting’;
(c) notes that, in
addition, the Council was commended for putting children at the
centre of practice, with children and young people across the city
benefiting from child focused staff and services and that the views
of children and young people are valued at all levels, and the
Local Authority has created an environment in which good social
work is nurtured and celebrated, with a skilled and confident
workforce;
(d) notes that, although
Ofsted highlighted many positive areas of practice, they also
highlighted some areas that ‘requires improvement to be
good’, which we identified in our self-assessment form sent
to the Inspectors prior to their visit, but that the report also
acknowledged in all those areas of concern senior management and
leaders were aware of those weaknesses, had effective plans in
place to mitigate risk and were taking action to improve each area
of practice;
(e) believes that this
is a fantastic achievement, and all the more remarkable given
increasing financial difficulties and increasing demand as more
children and young people are coming into care with more complex
needs, and thanks must go to the dedicated staff in
children’s services, all council staff, foster carers,
adopters, our agency partners, the community sector, Councillors,
and all corporate parents who work so hard to ensure our children
and young people and their families are safe, happy, secure, and
achieve their full potential; and
(f) notes that under this Administration the aim is to
continue to improve the service the Council provides and reach
‘outstanding’, and believes that by working together we
will achieve this in the future.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
8.1
|
It was formally moved by Councillor Jackie
Drayton, and formally seconded by Councillor Dawn Dale, that this
Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) notes that
following three weeks of inspection by Ofsted, they have noted that
‘Children’s Services in Sheffield are good’;
|
|
|
|
(b) notes that
the report detailed that, despite 10 years of austerity, Sheffield
had made steady progress since the last inspection in 2013, by
working through our comprehensive improvement plan, that has
children and young people at the heart of it:-
|
|
|
|
(i) securing significant
additional corporate investment;
(ii) support
from Senior Management and Leaders across all areas of the Council
and Partner Organisations; and
(iii) as noted
in the report, ‘Corporate parenting is ‘highly
effective and emulates what a good parent should be’ and that
‘the local authority sense of corporate responsibility for
children in care and care leavers is unambiguous’ and senior
leaders provide proactive and committed corporate parenting; the
report also highlights examples of practice that ‘exemplifies
excellence in corporate parenting’;
|
|
|
|
(c) notes that,
in addition, the Council was commended for putting children at the
centre of practice, with children and young people across the city
benefiting from child focused staff and services and that the views
of children and young people are valued at all levels, and the
Local Authority has created an environment in which good social
work is nurtured and celebrated, with a skilled and confident
workforce;
|
|
|
|
(d) notes that,
although Ofsted highlighted many positive areas of practice, they
also highlighted some areas that ‘requires improvement to be
good’, which we identified in our self-assessment form sent
to the Inspectors prior to their visit, but that the report also
acknowledged in all those areas of concern senior management and
leaders were aware of those weaknesses, had effective plans in
place to mitigate risk and were taking action to improve each area
of practice;
|
|
|
|
(e) believes
that this is a fantastic achievement, and all the more remarkable
given increasing financial difficulties and increasing demand as
more children and young people are coming into care with more
complex needs, and thanks must go to the dedicated staff in
children’s services, all council staff, foster carers,
adopters, our agency partners, the community sector, Councillors,
and all corporate parents who work so hard to ensure our children
and young people and their families are safe, happy, secure, and
achieve their full potential; and
|
|
|
|
(f)
notes that under this Administration the
aim is to continue to improve the service the Council provides and
reach ‘outstanding’, and believes that by working
together we will achieve this in the future.
|
|
|
8.2
|
Whereupon, it was formally moved by Councillor
Sue Alston, and formally seconded by Councillor Mike Levery, as an
amendment, that the Motion now submitted be amended by:-
|
|
|
|
1. the
deletion, from paragraph (b), of the words “despite 10 years
of austerity”;
2. the
deletion of paragraph (f) and the addition of a new paragraph (f)
as follows:-
|
|
|
|
(f)
resolves to continue to work with partners with the aim to continue
...
view the full minutes text for item 8.
|
|
9. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "Value for Money" - Given By Councillor Douglas Johnson And To Be Seconded By Councillor Ruth Mersereau
That this Council:-
(a) notes that, despite the destructive cuts inflicted
by the policy of austerity, this Administration is still
responsible for spending hundreds of millions of pounds each
year;
(b) believes this Administration should get the best
value for money it can because, if money is wasted, this means cuts
to other areas of spending, especially at a time when budgets are
under pressure;
(c) also believes that a failure to do routine work
quickly and cheaply leads to inertia and a lack of action;
(d) notes the following examples of work that this
Council believes is over-priced:-
(i)
£1m to install 500m of cycle lane on Trippet Lane;
(ii) a further £700,000 to install a crossing on
West Street;
(iii) £3,500 to
install just two cycle parking hoops;
(iv) £20,000 to
clear graffiti at Porter Brook Pocket Park; and
(v) installation of park benches at £1100 each;
and
(e) therefore calls on the Administration to examine
areas of spending where more might be obtained for the
Council’s resources.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
9.1
|
It was formally moved by Councillor Ruth
Mersereau, and formally seconded by Councillor Douglas Johnson,
that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) notes that, despite
the destructive cuts inflicted by the policy of austerity, this
Administration is still responsible for spending hundreds of
millions of pounds each year;
(b) believes this
Administration should get the best value for money it can because,
if money is wasted, this means cuts to other areas of spending,
especially at a time when budgets are under pressure;
|
|
|
|
(c) also believes
that a failure to do routine work quickly and cheaply leads to
inertia and a lack of action;
(d) notes the following
examples of work that this Council believes is over-priced:-
|
|
|
|
(i)
£3,500 to install just two cycle parking hoops; and
(ii) installation
of park benches at £1,100 each; and
|
|
|
|
(e) therefore calls on the Administration to examine
areas of spending where more might be obtained for the
Council’s resources.
|
|
|
9.1.1
|
(NOTE: In accordance with
Council Procedure Rule 10.3(e) (Scope of Notices of Motion),
paragraphs (d)(i), (ii) and (iv) of the
Motion, as published on the agenda, were rejected at the meeting by
the Chief Executive on the grounds of being factually
inaccurate. This followed the Council
agreeing not to give its consent (under Council Procedure Rule
17.10(a) – Alteration of Motion or Amendment) to a request
made on behalf of the mover of the Motion to alter the wording of
those three paragraphs in order to make them factually
accurate.)
|
|
|
9.2
|
Whereupon, it was formally moved by Councillor
Bob Johnson, and formally seconded by Councillor Mary Lea, as an
amendment, that the Motion now submitted be amended by the deletion
of all the words after the words “That this Council”
and the addition of the following words:-
|
|
|
|
(a) unequivocally
condemns what has now been nearly a decade of austerity inflicted
on this Council and believes that it is a matter of plain fact that
it is not possible to impose the level of cuts that have been
forced on this Council without having a significant impact on
services and the projects delivered by the Council;
|
|
|
|
(b) believes that public
money should always be spent wisely and confirms that the present
Administration is continuously maximising value for money and the
amounts delivered for the Council’s resources, and believes
that nine years into austerity it is incredulous that the Green
Group have called on “the Administration to examine areas of
spending where more might be obtained for the Council’s
resources”, as this is, of course, already done through the
budget process;
|
|
|
|
(c) regrets that
the politics of this motion is akin to the language used by former
Conservative Minister, the Rt. Hon. Lord Eric Pickles when the
Coalition government first began austerity and the attack on local
government funding, and also of the tactics of the Tax Payers
Alliance, and implies that the Green Party feel that it is not
austerity that is the problem, but how councils spend money based
on ...
view the full minutes text for item 9.
|
|
10. |
Changes To The Constitution PDF 200 KB
Report of the Chief
Executive on proposed changes to the Council’s Constitution,
primarily to bring the Officer Code of Conduct up to
date.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
10.1
|
RESOLVED: On the Motion of
Councillor Peter Rippon, seconded by Councillor Dianne Hurst, that
this Council approves the changes to the following parts of the
Council’s Constitution, as set out in the report of the Chief
Executive now submitted, and its appendices:-
(a) Part 4 – Scrutiny Procedure Rules;
(b) Part 5 –
Officer Code of Conduct; and
(c) Part 7 –
Management Structure and Statutory/Proper Officers).
|
|
11. |
Minutes Of Previous Council Meeting PDF 326 KB
To receive the record of the
proceedings of the meeting of the Council held on 3rd July 2019 and
to approve the accuracy thereof.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
11.1
|
RESOLVED: On the Motion of Councillor Peter
Rippon, seconded by Councillor Dianne Hurst, that the minutes of the meeting of the Council held on 3rd
July 2019, be approved as a true and accurate record.
|
|
|
|
12. |
Representation, Delegated Authority and Related Issues PDF 129 KB
To consider any changes to the
memberships and arrangements for meetings of Committees etc.,
delegated authority, and the appointment of representatives to
serve on other bodies.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
12.1
|
RESOLVED: On the Motion of Councillor Peter
Rippon, seconded by Councillor Dianne
Hurst, that:-
|
|
|
|
(a) it be noted
that the Leader of the Council had appointed (i) Councillor Mark
Jones to serve as Cabinet Member for Environment, Streetscene and
Climate Change, with effect from 29th August 2019, (ii)
Councillor Terry Fox to serve as Cabinet Member for Finance,
Resources and Governance, with effect from 3rd September
2019, and (iii) Councillor Terry Fox to serve as Deputy Leader of
the Council (the appointment to take effect on 11th
September 2019), following the resignations from those positions of
Councillors Olivia Blake and Lewis Dagnall on 23rd and
25th August, respectively;
|
|
|
|
(b) it be noted
that the Leader of the Council had appointed Councillors Terry Fox
and Mark Jones to serve on the Cabinet Highways Committee, in place
of Councillors Olivia Blake and Lewis Dagnall;
|
|
|
|
(c) it be noted
that, in accordance with the authority given by the City Council at
its annual meeting held on 15th May 2019, the Chief
Executive had authorised the appointment of Councillor Tony Damms
to serve on the South Yorkshire Local Pension Board;
|
|
|
|
(d) it be noted
that Lucy Davies had been appointed as a HealthWatch observer on
the Healthier Communities and Adult Social Care Scrutiny and Policy
Development Committee, with effect from 15th July 2019,
and that Margaret Kilner and Clive Skelton are no
longer serving in that role;
|
|
|
|
(e) it be noted
that Gillian Foster had resigned as the Church of
England Diocese representative on the Children, Young People and
Family Support Scrutiny and Policy Development
Committee;
|
|
|
|
(f) approval
be given to the following changes to the memberships of Committees,
Boards, etc.:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Children, Young People and Family Support Scrutiny and Policy
Development Committee
|
-
|
Councillor Joe Otten to fill a
vacancy; Councillor Olivia Blake to replace Councillor Andy
Bainbridge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthier Communities & Adult Social Care Scrutiny and
Policy Development Committee
|
-
|
Councillor Lewis Dagnall to
replace Councillor Mark Jones
|
|
|
|
|
|
Safer
and Stronger Communities Scrutiny and Policy Development
Committee
|
-
|
Remove Councillor Terry Fox and
create a vacancy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
and Standards Committee
|
-
|
Councillors Pat Midgley, Josie
Paszek and Sioned-Mair Richards to replace Councillors Francyne
Johnson, Mark Jones and Alan Law
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Officer Employment Committee
|
-
|
Councillors Terry Fox and Mark Jones to
replace Councillors Olivia Blake and Lewis Dagnall
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access
Liaison Group
|
-
|
Councillor Neale Gibson to fill
a vacancy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Joint Committee with Trade Unions
|
-
|
Councillors Terry Fox and Mark Jones to
replace Councillors Olivia Blake and Lewis Dagnall
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Members Group
|
-
|
Councillor Terry Fox to
replace Councillor Olivia Blake, and Councillor Simon Clement-Jones
to replace Councillor Shaffaq Mohammed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint
Commissioning Committee
|
-
|
Councillors Terry Fox and Mark Jones to
replace Councillors Olivia Blake and Lewis Dagnall
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place
Portfolio Joint Consultative Committee
|
-
|
Councillor Mark Jones to
replace Councillor Lewis Dagnall
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources/CEX Portfolio Joint Consultative Committee
|
-
|
Councillor Terry Fox to
replace Councillor Olivia Blake
|
|
|
|
(g)
representatives be appointed to serve on other bodies
...
view the full minutes text for item 12.
|
|