Agenda item

Notice of Motion Regarding "Transport Funding" - Given By Councillor Robert Murphy and to be Seconded by Councillor Douglas Johnson

That this Council:-

 

(a)       notes that the Mayor of Sheffield City Region has submitted proposals to build a £250 million East Coast Main Line railway station at Doncaster/Sheffield Airport;

 

(b)       notes that the Sheffield City Region Combined Authority has recently part funded the £66.5 million new road between the M18 and Doncaster/Sheffield Airport;

 

(c)        notes that the second phase of the road, which in effect is an access road for a private business, cost £10.55 million and included £9.1 million from Sheffield City Region with the balance paid by Doncaster Council;

 

(d)       notes The Peel Group obtained the freehold of the Sheffield City Airport site for the price of £1, and then closed the airport and built a business park;

 

(e)       notes that the Doncaster/Sheffield Airport site also benefits from Government tax incentives through its Enterprise Zone and has already benefitted from millions of pounds in grants;

 

(f)        notes the criticism made by the then Chair of the Public Accounts Committee, the Rt. Hon. Dame Margaret Hodge MP, who said "The most profitable parts of the Peel Group are managing to pay no UK corporation tax” and that “They do not pay their fair share of tax.”;

 

(g)       believes the main beneficiaries of these investments are property developers in the area, including Harworth Group and the owners of Doncaster/Sheffield Airport (Peel Airports Ltd., part of The Peel Group);

 

(h)       believes that the priority for rail passengers in Sheffield, the surrounding area, and travellers on our congested transport networks, is improvements to current services and investment in local routes;

 

(i)         believes numerous local improvements offer more direct benefits to regional travellers than a new link to the airport, for example, the reopening of stations such as Heeley, Millhouses and lines such as Sheffield Victoria to Stocksbridge; a direct connection between Doncaster and Barnsley; and improvements to cross-Pennine routes;

 

(j)         believes any further investment in links to Doncaster/Sheffield Airport should be made by the private sector; and

 

(k)        requests that a copy of this motion be forwarded to the Sheffield City Region Mayor and the Minister of State for Transport.

 

Minutes:

8.1

It was moved by Councillor Robert Murphy, and seconded by Councillor Douglas Johnson, that this Council:-

 

 

 

(a)       notes that the Mayor of Sheffield City Region has submitted proposals to build a £250 million East Coast Main Line railway station at Doncaster/Sheffield Airport;

 

(b)       notes that the Sheffield City Region Combined Authority has recently part funded the £66.5 million new road between the M18 and Doncaster/Sheffield Airport;

 

(c)        notes that the second phase of the road, which in effect is an access road for a private business, cost £10.55 million and included £9.1 million from Sheffield City Region with the balance paid by Doncaster Council;

 

(d)       notes The Peel Group obtained the freehold of the Sheffield City Airport site for the price of £1, and then closed the airport and built a business park;

 

(e)       notes that the Doncaster/Sheffield Airport site also benefits from Government tax incentives through its Enterprise Zone and has already benefitted from millions of pounds in grants;

 

(f)        notes the criticism made by the then Chair of the Public Accounts Committee, the Rt. Hon. Dame Margaret Hodge MP, who said "The most profitable parts of the Peel Group are managing to pay no UK corporation tax” and that “They do not pay their fair share of tax.”;

 

(g)       believes the main beneficiaries of these investments are property developers in the area, including Harworth Group and the owners of Doncaster/Sheffield Airport (Peel Airports Ltd., part of The Peel Group);

 

(h)       believes that the priority for rail passengers in Sheffield, the surrounding area, and travellers on our congested transport networks, is improvements to current services and investment in local routes;

 

(i)         believes numerous local improvements offer more direct benefits to regional travellers than a new link to the airport, for example, the reopening of stations such as Heeley, Millhouses and lines such as Sheffield Victoria to Stocksbridge; a direct connection between Doncaster and Barnsley; and improvements to cross-Pennine routes;

 

(j)         believes any further investment in links to Doncaster/Sheffield Airport should be made by the private sector; and

 

(k)        requests that a copy of this motion be forwarded to the Sheffield City Region Mayor and the Minister of State for Transport.

 

 

8.2

Whereupon, it was moved by Councillor Jack Scott, seconded by Councillor Mohammad Maroof, as an amendment, that the Motion now submitted be amended by the deletion of all the words after the words “That this Council” and the addition of the following words:-

 

 

 

(a)       welcomes the recent news that Doncaster Sheffield Airport has been named the best in the UK following a survey of passengers;

 

(b)       believes the development and future growth of the Airport represents an economic opportunity for the region and could lead to the development of significant job and business growth and improved local and national transport connectivity;

 

(c)        notes that phase two of the Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme will play a significant role in supporting the development of the Airport as well as supporting other economic opportunities in the area such as the inventive and job creating iPort;

 

(d)       welcomes that phase one has been a catalyst for business expansion of the Airport with 55% passenger growth over the past two years, making it one of the fasting growing airports in the UK;

 

(e)       notes that the Great Yorkshire Way has helped to create over 400 new jobs at the Airport itself and many more with over 100 businesses occupying another half a million square feet of space there;

 

(f)        notes that the road scheme has also opened the door to major housing projects and the wider regeneration of the local community;

 

(g)       welcomes the comments from the Mayor of Doncaster: “We always said Great Yorkshire Way was the route to jobs and growth. The pace and scale of private sector development delivered as a result of this new road in just two years is quite remarkable. We must remember that none of this existed a couple of years ago. The impact on our economy and the wider region is simply startling. Hundreds of millions of pounds worth of private sector investment has come into Doncaster, over 1,400 new jobs have so far been created and hundreds of new homes have been built”;

 

(h)       notes the overwhelming evidence illustrating the disparity in transport spending between the north and the south of England and supports the growing campaign across the north of England to get a fairer transport settlement for the North of England;

 

(i)         is astounded that, instead of campaigning for a fairer settlement for the north of England, the Green Party are calling on the removal of economic development projects in the region, such as HS2, and believes it should not be an ‘either/or’ situation in improving transport infrastructure and connections for Doncaster Sheffield Airport or funding the development of an improved local transport network in the region;

 

(j)         welcomes that the people of South Yorkshire overwhelmingly rejected what this Council regards as the anti-jobs Green Party candidate in the recent Sheffield City Region mayoral election and instead elected Mayor Dan Jarvis to secure the transport investment and economic growth the region needs, including supporting the implementation of the 2015 Sheffield City Region deal; and

 

(k)        believes that all companies should pay their fair share of tax and believes that a more effective means of tackling tax avoidance would be pursued under a Labour government than under the current government and previous coalition government.

 

 

8.2.1

(NOTE: With the agreement of the Council and at the request of the mover of the amendment (Councillor Jack Scott), the amendment as circulated at the meeting was altered by the insertion of the words “such as HS2”between the words “in the region” and “and believes” in paragraph (i).)

 

 

8.3

It was then moved by Councillor Ian Auckland, seconded by Councillor Mohammed Mahroof, as an amendment, that the Motion now submitted be amended by the deletion of all the words after the words “That this Council” and the addition of the following words:-

 

 

 

(a)       notes the ongoing development of Doncaster/Sheffield Airport, a great example of “swords into ploughshares” giving Sheffield, South Yorkshire and the wider City Region an airport with world class potential, and offering Sheffielders easy access to a range of popular holiday destinations;

 

(b)       congratulates the Airport on being voted as the ‘UKs Favourite Airport’ in a customer satisfaction survey by Saga and ‘Best UK Airport’ for the second time running in a survey by Which? magazine;

 

(c)        further notes Which? Magazine comments “that with its ambitions to expand, Doncaster Sheffield could soon become the go-to airport for holidaymakers in the North if it can maintain its high standard.”;

 

(d)       notes that long term infrastructure improvements have timescales which often well exceed political and administrative cycles;

 

(e)       notes and deplores the fact that the UK remains an overcentralized state, especially so in England, and so, irrespective of political differences, local government, including Sheffield, often must adopt a pragmatic approach to secure the delivery of much needed improvements to the local economy;

 

(f)        believes that Sheffield needs to be better connected, within local communities in Sheffield, within the City Region, and more widely, including internationally by air transportation;

 

(g)       notes that the real issue of concern is the long term transport funding injustice between London and the South East, and the “North”;

 

(h)       re-affirms concern at the failure of the Labour Leaders in South Yorkshire and the Labour administration of this Council to unlock long-term funding of £30 million per annum over 30 years (£900 million in total), by means of the City Region Devolution deal, in contrast to the support given to the development of the Airport; and

 

(i)         requests that a copy of this motion be forwarded to the Sheffield City Region Mayor and the Minister of State for Transport.

 

 

8.4

It was then formally moved by Councillor Douglas Johnson, and seconded by Councillor Alison Teal, as an amendment, that the Motion now submitted be amended by the addition of new paragraphs (l) to (o) as follows:-

 

 

 

(l)         notes that the Sheffield City Region Combined Authority Transport Committee was wound up and has not met since 8th May 2017;

 

(m)      notes that this Committee was previously cross party, held meetings in public and was webcast;

 

(n)       believes it is important that major decisions, such as support for the proposed airport link, are transparent and open to effective scrutiny in public; and

 

(o)       asks for the Leader of the Council to use her place on the Combined Authority to push for greater transparency and scrutiny through the revival of the Transport Committee.

 

 

8.5

It was then moved by Councillor John Booker, and formally seconded by Councillor Keith Davis, as an amendment, that the Motion now submitted be amended by the addition of new paragraphs (l) to (v) as follows:-

 

 

 

(l)         believes that a commercially viable, fully operational airport in Sheffield would be an enormous asset for the city;

 

(m)      notes that Sheffield City Airport was built as a CAP168 code 2C airport as per the agreement between The Sheffield Development Corporation (SDC), Glenlivet Ltd and Tinsley Park Ltd, dated 27th October 1995 and subsequent lease of August 1997; and that the definition of "Airport" for the purposes of the agreement is laid out in Article 106 of the Air Navigation Order of 1989 and is consistent with the definition as originally laid out in clause 1.17 of the agreement between SDC and British Steel Corporation;

 

(n)       further notes that in 1997, Sheffield City Airport opened as a CAT 5, code 2C airport, which means it should have had, and maintained, all the facilities needed to cope with an aircraft capable of carrying up to 115 passengers;

 

(o)       also notes that the Airport started commercial services some three years earlier than originally planned, with the successful introduction on 16th February 1998, of KLM's three times daily Amsterdam service, which was an instant success, with KLM saying it was their best start-up service ever, and that services followed to Jersey, London, Dublin, Belfast and Brussels and in 1998, 75,157 passengers passed through its terminal;

 

(p)       recognises that Sheffield Development Corporation estimated it would take at least seven years after opening before the airport would make any return on capital, and that this fact was well known and, indeed, as early as 1990, had been referred to by the SDC;

 

(q)       is interested to know how Peel Holdings and the airport operator, just eight weeks after them acquiring one half share of the Airport, were allowed to start downgrading it; for example (i) at the end of September 2001 they reduced airport Rescue and Fire Fighting Services cover from a CAT 5 to a CAT 3, (ii) by the end of September 2002 they reduced cover from CAT 3 to a CAT 1 and also turned off the Instrument Landing System (ILS) and (iii) at the end of August 2002 they started turning the terminal building into a business centre (offices) without planning permission;

 

(r)        regrets that all of these actions were quite clearly contrary to the intention of the lease, as well as Civil Aviation Authority legislation for a code 2C airport;

 

(s)        places on record that it is abundantly clear that the intention of the lease/agreement was for an operational airport to be in existence for at least "the reverter period", a minimum of ten years from the date of opening;

 

(t)         strongly asserts that rules and regulations should be abided by, and the closure of Sheffield City Airport was done in a most unsatisfactory manner, causing Sheffield one of its worst civic lost opportunities;

 

(u)       further notes that Sheffield City Airport closed to all traffic in 2008, and that an area of eighty acres of prime development land, described as the best site on the M1 corridor between Leeds and Leicester, was transferred to Sheffield Business Parks Ltd, for a notional £1.00, which has never been collected; and

 

(v)        further regrets that the City has lost an airport and has allowed Peel Holdings to profit from the land developments.

 

 

8.6

Following a right of reply from Councillor Robert Murphy, the amendment moved by Councillor Jack Scott, as altered at the meeting, was put to the vote and was carried.

 

 

8.6.1

(NOTE: Councillors Simon Clement-Jones, Bob Pullin, Richard Shaw, Mohammed Mahroof, Joe Otten, Colin Ross, Martin Smith, Roger Davison, Sue Alston, Andrew Sangar, Cliff Woodcraft, Ian Auckland, Sue Auckland, Steve Ayris, Gail Smith, David Baker, Penny Baker, Vickie Priestley and Mike Levery voted for paragraphs (a) to (i) of the amendment and voted against paragraphs (j) and (k) of the amendment, and asked for this to be recorded.)

 

 

8.7

The amendment moved by Councillor Ian Auckland was then put to the vote and was negatived.

 

 

8.8

The amendment moved by Councillor Douglas Johnson was then put to the vote and was also negatived.

 

 

8.9

The amendment moved by Councillor John Booker was then put to the vote and was also negatived.

 

 

8.9.1

(NOTE: Councillors Kaltum Rivers, Douglas Johnson, Robert Murphy, Martin Phipps and Alison Teal voted for paragraphs (m) to (s) and (u) and (v) of the amendment, and abstained from voting on paragraphs (l) and (t) of the amendment, and asked for this to be recorded.)

 

 

8.10

The original Motion, as amended, was then put as a Substantive Motion in the following form and carried:-

 

 

 

RESOLVED: That this Council:- 

 

 

 

(a)       welcomes the recent news that Doncaster Sheffield Airport has been named the best in the UK following a survey of passengers;

 

(b)       believes the development and future growth of the Airport represents an economic opportunity for the region and could lead to the development of significant job and business growth and improved local and national transport connectivity;

 

(c)        notes that phase two of the Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme will play a significant role in supporting the development of the Airport as well as supporting other economic opportunities in the area such as the inventive and job creating iPort;

 

(d)       welcomes that phase one has been a catalyst for business expansion of the Airport with 55% passenger growth over the past two years, making it one of the fasting growing airports in the UK;

 

(e)       notes that the Great Yorkshire Way has helped to create over 400 new jobs at the Airport itself and many more with over 100 businesses occupying another half a million square feet of space there;

 

(f)        notes that the road scheme has also opened the door to major housing projects and the wider regeneration of the local community;

 

(g)       welcomes the comments from the Mayor of Doncaster: “We always said Great Yorkshire Way was the route to jobs and growth. The pace and scale of private sector development delivered as a result of this new road in just two years is quite remarkable. We must remember that none of this existed a couple of years ago. The impact on our economy and the wider region is simply startling. Hundreds of millions of pounds worth of private sector investment has come into Doncaster, over 1,400 new jobs have so far been created and hundreds of new homes have been built”;

 

(h)       notes the overwhelming evidence illustrating the disparity in transport spending between the north and the south of England and supports the growing campaign across the north of England to get a fairer transport settlement for the North of England;

 

(i)         is astounded that, instead of campaigning for a fairer settlement for the north of England, the Green Party are calling on the removal of economic development projects in the region, such as HS2, and believes it should not be an ‘either/or’ situation in improving transport infrastructure and connections for Doncaster Sheffield Airport or funding the development of an improved local transport network in the region;

 

(j)         welcomes that the people of South Yorkshire overwhelmingly rejected what this Council regards as the anti-jobs Green Party candidate in the recent Sheffield City Region mayoral election and instead elected Mayor Dan Jarvis to secure the transport investment and economic growth the region needs, including supporting the implementation of the 2015 Sheffield City Region deal; and

 

(k)        believes that all companies should pay their fair share of tax and believes that a more effective means of tackling tax avoidance would be pursued under a Labour government than under the current government and previous coalition government.

 

 

 

8.10.1

(NOTE: 1. Councillors Simon Clement-Jones, Bob Pullin, Richard Shaw, Mohammed Mahroof, Joe Otten, Colin Ross, Martin Smith, Roger Davison, Sue Alston, Andrew Sangar, Cliff Woodcraft, Ian Auckland, Sue Auckland, Steve Ayris, Gail Smith, David Baker, Penny Baker, Vickie Priestley and Mike Levery voted for paragraphs (a) to (i) of the Substantive Motion and voted against paragraphs (j) and (k) of the Substantive Motion, and asked for this to be recorded; and

 

 

 

2. Councillors Kaltum Rivers, Douglas Johnson, Robert Murphy, Martin Phipps and Alison Teal voted for paragraph (h) of the Substantive Motion and abstained from voting on paragraphs (a) to (g) and (i) to (k) of the Substantive Motion, and asked for this to be recorded.)