Agenda item

Applications Under Various Acts/Regulations

Report of the Director of Development Services.

Minutes:

6.1

RESOLVED: That (a) the applications now submitted for permission to develop land under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the Regulations made thereunder and for consent under the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1989, be decided, granted or refused as stated in the report to this Committee for this date in respect of Case No. 13/00498/FUL and other applications considered to be amended as in the minutes of this meeting, and the requisite notices issued; the granting of any permission or consent shall not constitute approval, permission or consent by this Committee or the Council for any other purpose; and

 

 

 

(b) following consideration of (i) a correction to the report on page 42, line 16, additional representations, and consideration of amendments to condition 2 to replace plan entitled “Landscape Details Dwg. No. R/1409/1” with “Landscape Details Dwg. No. R/1409/1A” and condition 7 to exclude the delivery of newspapers from the restriction, and additional conditions, as detailed in a supplementary report circulated at the meeting and (ii) additional representations at the meeting from Councillor Adam Hurst, Councillor Andrew Bainbridge, Ecclesfield Parish Council, 4 local residents and two pupils from High Green Infant Junior School, speaking in opposition to the application and from the agent for the applicant speaking in favour of the application, and, notwithstanding the officer’s recommendation, an application for planning permission for the demolition of existing Public House and erection of convenience store (Use Class A1) and hot food takeaway (Use Class A5) at the site of Old Cart and Horses Inn, 2 Wortley Road, High Green (Case No. 12/03543/FUL) be refused as the Committee considered that the application would be detrimental to the free and safe flow of traffic and pedestrian safety and would not provide adequate servicing arrangements, and furthermore, the design of the store was also out of character with the area and would detract from the amenities of the locality.

 

Supporting documents: