Agenda item

Objections to Proposed 20MPH Speed Limit in the Charnock Area

Report of the Executive Director, Place.

Decision:

5.1

The Executive Director, Place submitted a report outlining the receipt of an objection to the introduction of a 20mph speed limit in the Charnock area and setting out the Council’s response.

 

 

5.2

RESOLVED: That the Charnock 20mph Speed Limit Order be made in accordance with the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984.

 

 

5.3

Reasons for Decision

 

 

5.3.1

Reducing the speed of traffic in residential areas will, in the long term, reduce the number and severity of accidents, reduce the fear of accidents, encourage sustainable modes of travel and contribute towards the creation of a more pleasant, cohesive environment.

 

 

5.3.2

Having considered the objection to the introduction of a 20mph speed limit in Charnock, the officer view was that the reasons set out in the report for making the Speed Limit Order outweigh the objection. The introduction of a 20mph speed limit in this area would be in-keeping with the City’s approved 20mph Speed Limit Strategy.

 

 

5.3.3

No objections had been received in response to the advertisement of Traffic Regulation Orders prohibiting parking on ‘School Keep Clear’ markings and other associated restrictions outside Charnock Hall Primary School.

 

 

5.4

Alternatives Considered and Rejected

 

 

 

The objection related to the principle of introducing sign-only 20mph speed limits into residential areas, and therefore the recently approved Sheffield 20mph Speed Limit Strategy. As such, no alternative options had been considered. Speeds will be monitored and the addition of further measures will be considered, if appropriate.

 

 

5.5

Any Interest Declared or Dispensation Granted

 

 

 

None

 

 

5.6

Reason for Exemption if Public/Press Excluded During Consideration

 

 

 

None

 

 

5.7

Respective Director Responsible for Implementation

 

 

 

Simon Green, Executive Director, Place

 

 

5.8

Relevant Scrutiny and Policy Development Committee If Decision Called In

 

 

 

Economic and Environmental Wellbeing

 

Minutes:

6.1

The Executive Director, Place submitted a report outlining the receipt of an objection to the introduction of a 20mph speed limit in the Charnock area and setting out the Council’s response.

 

 

6.2

RESOLVED: That:

 

 

 

(a)

the Charnock 20mph Speed Limit Order be made in accordance with the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984;

 

 

 

 

(b)

the objector be informed accordingly;

 

 

 

 

(c)

the parking restriction Traffic Regulation Orders be made outside Charnock Hall Priimary School, as shown in Appendix B of the report, in accordance with the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984;

 

 

 

 

(d)

the proposed 20mph speed limit and parking restrictions be introduced.

 

 

 

6.3

Reasons for Decision

 

 

6.3.1

Reducing the speed of traffic in residential areas will, in the long term, reduce the number and severity of accidents, reduce the fear of accidents, encourage sustainable modes of travel and contribute towards the creation of a more pleasant, cohesive environment.

 

 

6.3.2

Having considered the objection to the introduction of a 20mph speed limit in Charnock, the officer view was that the reasons set out in the report for making the Speed Limit Order outweigh the objection. The introduction of a 20mph speed limit in this area would be in-keeping with the City’s approved 20mph Speed Limit Strategy.

 

 

6.3.3

No objections had been received in response to the advertisement of Traffic Regulation Orders prohibiting parking on ‘School Keep Clear’ markings and other associated restrictions outside Charnock Hall Primary School.

 

 

6.4

Alternatives Considered and Rejected

 

 

 

The objection related to the principle of introducing sign-only 20mph speed limits into residential areas, and therefore the recently approved Sheffield 20mph Speed Limit Strategy. As such, no alternative options had been considered. Speeds will be monitored and the addition of further measures will be considered, if appropriate.

 

 

 

Supporting documents: