Decision Maker: Highway Cabinet Member Decision Session
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
6.1 |
The Executive Director, Place submitted a report outlining objections to the introduction of three experimental taxi ranks in the City Centre and setting out the Council’s response. |
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
RESOLVED: That:- |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the experimental Traffic Regulation Order be made permanent for the three taxi ranks in accordance with the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
the objectors be informed accordingly. |
|
|
|
5.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
|
|
|
|
5.3.1 |
The benefits of retaining these ranks outweigh the objections received, most of which had not been sustained. |
|
|
|
|
5.3.2 |
The Rockingham Street Rank
The lead petitioner was contacted after the rank had been in place for several months and views sought as to the practical impact of the rank. No response was received.
The individual objectors were also contacted and two responded. Their views about the rank were the complete opposite of one another, with one saying the situation was worse than anticipated and couldn’t sleep due to the noise from the taxis and the other stating that the noise, since the rank was introduced, was no worse than before. |
|
|
|
|
6.3.3 |
The Carver Street Rank
The lead petitioner was contacted after the rank had been in place for several months and views sought as to the practical impact of the rank. No response was received. |
|
|
|
|
6.3.4 |
The Burgess Street Rank
A few months after the rank was put in place, the person who objected was contacted and views sought as to the practical impact of the rank. No response was received. |
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
|
|
|
|
5.4.1 |
The locations of the ranks were agreed with taxi representatives, club owners and the Police. |
|
|
|
|
5.4.2 |
No alternative options were considered. Past experience of placing ranks remote from venues has simply not worked. Most people simply walk towards their next destination and flag a taxi down on the way. The drivers waiting in the remote rank lose trade and the rank becomes little used. Picking customers up at the venue may also help to reduce anti-social behaviour and noise remote from the venue, as there are fewer people walking the streets looking for a cab. |
|
|
|
|
6.5 |
Any Interest Declared or Dispensation Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
6.6 |
Reason for Exemption if Public/Press Excluded During Consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
Respective Director Responsible for Implementation |
|
|
|
|
|
Simon Green, Executive Director, Place |
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
Relevant Scrutiny and Policy Development Committee If Decision Called In |
|
|
|
|
|
Economic and Environmental Wellbeing |
Report author: Richard Skelton
Publication date: 02/04/2014
Date of decision: 20/03/2014
Decided at meeting: 20/03/2014 - Highway Cabinet Member Decision Session
Effective from: 09/04/2014
Accompanying Documents: