Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Decision:
12.1
|
The Director of Policy and Democratic Engagement
presented a report providing an update on progress towards the
recommendations made by the Lowcock report into the street trees
dispute, and the additional commitments made in the Council’s
response.
The report sets out the good progress that has
been made against the substantial majority of the recommendations
that were due to be completed by this point. It also explains the reasons that a small number
of recommendations have not been completed within the original
timescales and describes how these are intended to be progressed
and resolved.
Finally, it sets out progress against the wider
and longer-term recommendations which are not yet due to complete
and proposes that these be monitored via the relevant programmes of
work that these relate to, including, particularly the Future
Sheffield programme.
|
|
|
12.2
|
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That Strategy and
Resources Policy Committee:-
|
|
|
|
(a) notes the progress made since the last update to
the committee in December 2023 towards the actions agreed in the
June 2023 ‘Learning from the past and moving ahead: response
to the Sheffield Street Tree Inquiry’
report;
(b) notes the
ongoing work to complete the remaining apologies to those who are
owed them, and notes the renewed progress on the work to design and
install a commemorative plaque in the Town Hall;
(c) notes the
underpinning reports that sets out in more detail the key activity
relating to governance, information management, organisational
culture and transformation, and to agree that the remaining actions
in these areas should be progressed through the relevant service
areas and/or programmes as set out in section 4 of this report,
with contingent decisions being made and monitored by the relevant
committee; and
(d) agrees that
whilst good progress has been made, the most critical lessons of
the street tree dispute are the importance of listening to the
people and communities of Sheffield, to hearing different points of
view, to reflecting on mistakes and to being open to feedback at
all times, and further agrees to commit to an ongoing dialogue with
the people of Sheffield as the organisation continues to
improve
|
|
|
12.3
|
Reasons for Decision
|
|
|
12.3.1
|
There has been
substantial progress towards the recommendations for Sheffield City
Council as set out in the Lowcock and subsequently agreed by
Strategy and Resources Committee in June 2023.
|
|
|
12.3.2
|
This progress includes taking forward actions across the themes
of reconciliation, Streets Ahead, and the wider council, and means
that the actions that were recommended to have been taken by this
point are now substantially completed.
As such, it is not proposed that a further report is brought to the
committee, but that the remaining actions are taken forward within
other workstreams (including, particularly, the Future Sheffield
programme which will drive the wider transformation of the
organisation).
|
|
|
12.3.3
|
Although the immediate actions recommended by Sir Mark in his
report have now been completed, it will take concerted ongoing
effort to fully respond to the findings of the report and to reset
the council’s relationship with communities and to regain
trust with those who were let down by the council’s approach
during the street trees dispute.
|
|
|
12.4
|
Alternatives Considered and
Rejected
|
|
|
12.4.1
|
Alternative Option: Not to provide an update
report
It would have been possible not to provide a further update
report to Strategy and Resources Policy Committee on this
matter. This was dismissed because of
the direct request of the committee for a further report on
progress at this point, and because of the degree of public
interest in the street tree dispute and the Lowcock Inquiry, and
the Council’s ongoing commitment to learn lessons and take
action in response to the recommendations.
|
Report author: James Henderson
Publication date: 02/09/2024
Date of decision: 29/08/2024
Decided at meeting: 29/08/2024 - Strategy and Resources Policy Committee
Accompanying Documents: