Decision Maker: Co-operative Executive
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Purpose:
The report will seek approval
for a revised Local Development Scheme (LDS) which will set out the
local plan documents the Council will consult on and the timetable
for producing them.
The report will also set out
the process for engaging with Members of the Council on the overall
spatial options, with the aim of reaching agreement on a preferred
approach in advance of producing the Draft Sheffield Plan (to be
published for public consultation in 2022).
Decision:
8.1
|
The report
sought approval for a revised Local Development Scheme (LDS) (which
set out the development plan documents that SCC will prepare and
consult on and the timetable for producing them) and to secure the
bringing into effect of the LDS on 21 October 2021.
The report also
set out the process for engaging with Members on the overall
spatial options, with the aim of reaching agreement on a preferred
approach by January 2022 (in advance of producing the Publication
Draft Sheffield Plan; to be published for public consultation in
October 2022).
Approval was
also sought for the establishment of a new Sheffield Plan Member
Working Group to provide an ongoing political steer for officers on
the content of the Plan.
|
|
|
11.2
|
RESOLVED: That Co-operative Executive:-
- approves the revised Local Development Scheme
attached as an Appendix to this report;
- resolves that it is to have effect from 21
October 2021;
- agrees to the LDS being published on the
Council’s website;
- approves the process for cross-party engagement
with Members on the overall spatial options;
and
- approves the establishment of a new Sheffield Plan Member
Working Group, with membership drawn from the Climate Change,
Economy and Development Transitional Committee
|
|
|
8.3
|
Reasons for Decision
|
|
|
8.3.1
|
As explained in
the report, the local planning authority is legally required to
produce a Local Development Scheme and keep it up to date and so
the recommendations in this report are made to secure compliance
with that statutory requirement. The
LDS sets the timetable for delivery of a new Local Plan, which will
be designed to contribute towards securing a strong economy,
thriving neighbourhoods and communities, improving health and
wellbeing, addressing inequalities across the city, mitigating and
adapting to climate change and increasing
biodiversity.
|
|
|
8.3.2
|
The changes to
national planning policy and practice guidance mean it is
appropriate to allow more time for the new administration to
consider the overall spatial options.
Officers require a clear political steer on the preferred broad
approach before the details can be worked in the full Publication
Draft Plan and before public consultation takes place in autumn
2022.
|
|
|
8.3.3
|
Establishment of
a new cross-party Sheffield Plan Member Working Group will enable
officers to obtain an ongoing political steer on the content of the
Plan in advance of the Plan being submitted to Government for
public examination.
|
8.4
|
Alternatives Considered and Rejected
|
|
|
8.4.1
|
The preparation,
bringing into effect and revision of a Local Development Scheme are
statutory requirements and in that regard there is no alternative
option. Otherwise the Secretary of
State can prepare an LDS and direct the local planning authority to
bring it into effect and the Council would have very little, if
any, input into that. However, the time
periods allocated to each stage of the process in the revised LDS
have been carefully considered. It is
important that timely progress is made but it is equally important
that the timetable can be adhered to.
The time periods included in the revised LDS are considered to be
the most appropriate and realistic.
|
|
|
8.4.2
|
In the proposed
revised LDS, we have allowed for additional time after submission
of the Plan because experience elsewhere suggests that the process
from the date of submission to adoption typically takes 18-24
months. Given the size of Sheffield and
the number of sites that are likely to be the subject of
representations at examination, we believe that a period of 20
months is a reasonable estimate for that stage in the
process.
|
|
|
8.5
|
Any
Interest Declared or Dispensation Granted
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
8.6
|
Reason for Exemption if Public/Press Excluded During
Consideration
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
8.7
|
Respective Director Responsible for
Implementation
|
|
|
|
Interim
Executive Director, Place
|
|
|
8.8
|
Relevant Scrutiny and Policy Development Committee If Decision
Called In
|
|
|
|
Overview and
Scrutiny Management Committee
|
Report author: Simon Vincent
Publication date: 22/10/2021
Date of decision: 20/10/2021
Decided at meeting: 20/10/2021 - Co-operative Executive
Effective from: 29/10/2021
Accompanying Documents: