Decision Maker: Co-operative Executive
Decision status: Recommendations approved
To agree the overall spatial approach in the emerging Sheffield (Local) Plan.
The report will set out the overall spatial options for meeting future development needs in Sheffield in the period to 2039. It will seek agreement on a preferred approach in advance of producing the Publication Draft Sheffield Plan (to be published for public consultation in October 2022).
The Government has increased the housing need figure for Sheffield by 35% and the implications of providing land for new homes and jobs to support this higher figure requires careful consideration.
It is desirable, as far as possible, to build a political consensus around how Sheffield should grow and develop over the next 18 years. Once a preferred overall spatial approach has been agreed, it will then be used to develop more detailed policies, proposals and site allocations in the Draft Sheffield Plan.
8.1 |
The report set out the overall spatial options for meeting future development needs in Sheffield in the period to 2039. The overall aim of that process is for the Council to reach a decision on a preferred approach in advance of producing the Publication Draft Sheffield Plan (to be published for public consultation in October 2022). |
|
|
8.2 |
RESOLVED: That Co-operative Executive:-
|
|
notes the advice provided by both the Climate Change, Economy and Development Transitional Committee and full Council and agrees that Option 3 (as set out in paragraph 1.7.12 of the Appendix to this report) is the preferred spatial option that should be taken forward in the Publication (Pre-Submission) Draft Sheffield Plan. |
|
|
8.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
|
|
8.3.1 |
Officers require a clear steer on the preferred approach before the details can be worked in the full Publication Draft Plan and before further public consultation takes place in autumn 2022. |
|
|
8.3.2 |
The options set out in this report mean there are difficult choices to be made between social, economic and environmental objectives and a thorough cross-party engagement process is desired to mitigate the risk of the draft plan being rejected by full Council at a later stage. |
|
|
8.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
|
|
8.4.1 |
The main spatial options relating to the scale and location of future development are already set out in sections 1.6 and 1.7 of the report. |
|
|
8.4.2 |
Officers could have worked on producing the Publication Draft Local Plan without seeking a specific Member steer on the overall spatial approach. However, to date, it has proved difficult to build a consensus on what is the correct approach for the city; in particular, there has been considerable concern on whether land should be removed from the Green Belt in order to provide more land for development. Without a thorough cross-party engagement process on the overall spatial approach, there would be a very significant risk of the Publication Draft Plan being rejected by full Council. |
|
|
8.5 |
Any Interest Declared or Dispensation Granted |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
8.6 |
Reason for Exemption if Public/Press Excluded During Consideration |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
8.7 |
Respective Director Responsible for Implementation |
|
|
|
Executive Director, Place |
|
|
8.8 |
Relevant Scrutiny and Policy Development Committee If Decision Called In |
|
|
|
Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee |
Publication date: 21/02/2022
Date of decision: 16/02/2022
Decided at meeting: 16/02/2022 - Co-operative Executive
Effective from: 26/02/2022
Accompanying Documents: