Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Apologies for Absence
Additional documents:
Minutes:
1.1
|
Apologies for absence were received from
Councillors Ian Auckland, Lewis Chinchen, Kurtis Crossland,
Christine Gilligan Kubo, Maleiki Haybe, Toby Mallinson, Nabeela
Mowlana, Henry Nottage, Vickie Priestley, Maroof Raouf, Sophie
Thornton, Sophie Wilson and Paul Wood.
|
|
|
|
2. |
Exclusion of the Press and Public
To identify items where resolutions may be
moved to exclude the press and public.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
2.1
|
There were no items of business identified
where resolutions may be moved to exclude the press and public.
|
|
|
|
3. |
Declarations of Interest PDF 86 KB
Members to declare any
interests they have in the business to be considered at the
meeting.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
3.1
|
There were no
declarations of interest made by Members of the Council.
|
|
|
|
4. |
Memberships of Council Bodies, Representatives to Serve on Other Bodies and Related Issues PDF 47 KB
To consider any changes to the
memberships and arrangements for meetings of Committees etc.,
delegated authority, and the appointment of representatives to
serve on other bodies.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
4.1
|
At the commencement of item 5 on the agenda
(Public Questions and Petitions and Other Communications), the Lord
Mayor (Councillor Colin Ross) reported
that the Council had received notification
that 7 Councillors had resigned from the Labour Group and intended
to form a new political group on the Council. He stated that there were no immediate
implications for this Council meeting, other than the fact that the
seating plan for the meeting had been adjusted. The Lord Mayor added that, in view of this change
to its composition, the Council must consider proportionality
implications in the membership of its committees and sub-committees
as soon as practicable, and that it was expected that this would be
done at the next meeting of the Council scheduled to be held on
1st November 2023. The Lord
Mayor concluded by stating that, other than the routine changes
proposed to be made under item 12 on the agenda (Memberships of
Council Bodies and Representatives To Serve On Other Bodies), no
further changes would be made to memberships of the Council’s
Committees until the Council next meets.
|
|
|
4.2
|
It was then
RESOLVED: On the motion of Councillor Bryan Lodge and seconded by
the Lord Mayor (Councillor Colin Ross), that, in accordance with
Council Procedure Rule 9.1, the order of business as published on
the Council Summons be altered by taking item
12 on the agenda (Memberships of Council Bodies and Representatives
To Serve On Other Bodies) at this
point in the proceedings.
|
|
|
4.3
|
It was formally moved by Councillor
Sioned-Mair Richards and formally
seconded by Councillor Ruth Milsom, that:-
|
|
|
|
(a) it be noted that, in accordance with the
authority given by the City Council at its annual meeting held on
17th May 2023, the Monitoring
Officer had authorised the following appointment(s), with
effect from the date(s) shown:-
|
|
|
|
Waste and Street Scene Policy
Committee
|
-
|
Councillor Tony Downing
replaced Councillor Julie Grocutt as substitute member of the
Committee, with effect from 21 September 2023; and
|
|
|
|
(b) representatives be
appointed to serve on other bodies as follows:-
|
|
|
|
South Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Authority
|
-
|
Councillor Laura McClean to
replace Councillor Tony Damms.
|
|
|
4.4
|
After contributions from three Members, and
following legal advice reported by the General Counsel, Councillor
Sioned-Mair Richards proposed that paragraph (b) be withdrawn from
her Motion. With the consent of both the seconder of the motion
and of the meeting, paragraph (b) was withdrawn from
consideration.
|
|
|
4.5
|
Whereupon it was RESOLVED: That it be noted
that, in accordance
with the authority given by the City Council at its annual meeting
held on 17th May 2023, the Monitoring Officer had authorised the
following appointment(s), with effect from the date(s)
shown:-
|
|
|
|
Waste and Street Scene Policy
Committee
|
-
|
Councillor Tony Downing
replaced Councillor Julie Grocutt as substitute member of the
Committee, with effect from 21 September 2023.
|
|
|
|
5. |
Public Questions and Petitions and Other Communications PDF 124 KB
To receive any questions or
petitions from the public, or communications submitted by the Lord
Mayor or the Chief Executive and to pass such resolutions thereon
as the Council Procedure Rules permit and as may be deemed
expedient.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
5.1
|
Lord Mayor’s
Announcements
|
|
|
5.1.1
|
The Lord Mayor (Councillor
Colin Ross) expressed thanks for contributions which had been made
to his fundraising event for St.
Luke’s Hospice on 15th September, where he had walked 9 miles
visiting several St. Luke’s shops on route. He added that any further contributions could be
made at today’s Council meeting via the collection being
passed around the Council Chamber.
|
|
|
5.1.2
|
The Lord Mayor also congratulated Councillor
Dawn Dale who had completed a sponsored abseil down Sheffield
Hallam University’s Owen building on 30th September, also
raising funds for St. Luke’s
Hospice.
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
Petitions and Public Questions
|
|
|
|
The Lord Mayor
(Councillor Colin Ross) reported that questions would be taken at
the meeting from seven members of the public. No petitions had been received.
|
|
|
5.2.1
|
Question from Sue
Owen
|
|
|
|
Sue Owen asked the following
question on behalf of Sheffield Campaign for Divestment from
Companies that are Complicit with Human Rights Abuses in Palestine,
which is part of the Sheffield Anti-Israeli Apartheid Coalition
-
|
|
|
|
“The Labour
Party has sought legal advice on the Economic Activity of Public
Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill and Richard Kermer, KC has
concluded: “The implications for
local democracy, for the proud history in our regions of
campaigning for global human rights, for using our economic clout
for the promotion of human rights, for free speech in this country
and for compliance with our international law obligations, are
potentially profound.”
|
|
|
|
In the light of
the damage to local democracy that this bill would introduce,
has Sheffield Council written a
response to the consultation about the bill, and if yes, will you
publish that response?”
|
|
|
|
In response, the Leader of the
Council (Councillor Tom Hunt) advised that the Council does not
have a position on the Bill, which was not yet on the statute
books. The Labour Party had not
supported the Bill at its second reading and it was now in the
Committee Stage before a third reading in the House of Commons and
then further stages in the House of Lords.
|
|
|
|
He added that the Labour Party
was clear that all public bodies must act
without bias or selectivity when making ethical decisions on
procurement and investment, but was concerned that the Bill risked
significantly undermining support for groups around the world
facing persecution, such as the Uyghur.
The Labour Party have asked the Government to bring forward
alternative proposals because they believe the Bill would place
unprecedented restrictions on the ability of public bodies to
express a view on policy, has potential widespread and negative
impacts on local government pension funds, and was likely to be
subject to repeated and extended legal
challenges.
|
|
|
5.2.2
|
Question from
Dylan Lewis-Creser
|
|
|
|
“What will the Council be doing to ensure that the
benefits of Active Travel Neighbourhoods, as we've seen in Crookes
& Walkley, are spread across the city, especially in areas in
need of a social uplift?”
|
|
|
|
In response,
Councillor Ben Miskell (Chair of the Transport, Regeneration and
Climate Policy Committee) stated that
the ...
view the full minutes text for item 5.
|
|
6. |
Members' Questions PDF 1 MB
6.1 Questions relating to
urgent business – Council Procedure Rule 16.6(ii).
6.2 Questions relating to the
discharge of the functions of the South Yorkshire Joint Authorities
(under the provisions of Section 41 of the Local Government Act
1985) and of the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined
Authority – Council Procedure Rule 16.6(i).
6.3 Supplementary questions on
written questions submitted at this meeting – Council
Procedure Rule 16.4.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
6.1
|
Urgent
Business
|
|
|
|
With the permission
of the Lord Mayor (Councillor Colin Ross), Councillor Mike Chaplin
asked the following question relating to urgent business, under the
provisions of Council Procedure Rule 16.6(ii):-
|
|
|
|
“Considering the Prime Minister’s announcement
earlier today about the cancellation of HS2 and announcements on
several other transport projects, what will the impact be on
Sheffield?”
|
|
|
|
In response,
Councillor Ben Miskell (Chair of the Transport, Regeneration and
Climate Policy Committee) reported that this
announcement at the Conservative party conference in Manchester of
the cancellation of the northern leg of HS2 followed on from the
previous announcement by the Government to cancel the eastern leg
which would also have been of benefit for Sheffield and the wider
region. He believed that most people
would agree with the South Yorkshire Mayor, Oliver Coppard, that
the move was a catastrophe for the country in its ambitions to
deliver growth.
|
|
|
|
Councillor Miskell advised that
the Prime Minister’s announcement of “Network
North” consisted of a collection of transport schemes that
were either already in progress or where local authorities in the
region had already been working on for several years, such as the
Don Valley Line. He added that he
welcomed the Government’s support for the Council’s
plans for the reopening of passenger services to Stocksbridge,
Deepcar and Oughtibridge, where the Council wished to see a tram
train connecting to an expanded tram network, and a single project
alongside the Barrow Hill line, which would open tram train stops
in Darnall, Woodhouse and Beighton.
There had also been announcements about services to Manchester and
the Hope Valley Line, where work had started two years
ago.
|
|
|
|
Councillor Miskell added that
he remained determined to see the reintroduction of the direct
train service to Manchester Airport. He also expressed frustration
that the Government was opting to make announcements at party
conference, instead of working collaboratively with northern
leaders to deliver infrastructure projects.
|
|
|
6.2
|
South
Yorkshire Joint and Combined Authorities
|
|
|
|
There were no
questions relating to the discharge of the functions of the South
Yorkshire Joint Authorities for Fire and Rescue and Pensions and of
the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority, under the
provisions of Council Procedure Rule 16.6(i).
|
|
|
6.3
|
Written
Questions
|
|
|
|
A schedule of
questions to Chairs of Policy Committees, submitted in accordance
with Council Procedure Rule 16, and which contained written
answers, was circulated. Supplementary questions, under the
provisions of Council Procedure Rule 16.4, were asked and were
answered by the appropriate Policy Committee Chairs until the
expiry of the time limit for Members’ Questions (in
accordance with Council Procedure Rule 16.7).
|
|
|
|
7. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "More Cash In People's Pockets at Christmas" - Given By Councillor Fran Belbin And To Be Seconded by Councillor Laura McClean
This council;
a)
believes that the Conservatives have wreaked havoc on our economy,
and notes that mortgage rates are soaring, economic growth is flat
and working people are paying the price;
b)
notes that the UK is forecast to have the highest inflation of any
major economy this year which means rising prices, higher bills and
less money in your pocket;
c)
notes that prices of food and non-alcoholic beverages rose by 13.6%
in the year to August 2023;
d)
notes recent research by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation which found
that 5.7 million low-income households are having to cut down or
skip meals because they don’t have enough money for
food;
e)
notes that lots of people across Sheffield are struggling as prices
and bills continue to rise;
f)
notes that wintertime can be an expensive time for lots of people,
especially families;
g)
believes that a cash-first approach is an effective, direct way to
provide financial help that trusts people to make the best choices
for them;
h)
notes that in July 2023, the Strategy and Resources Committee
unanimously approved a spending plan for the Household Support Fund
in 2023/24, based on detailed cohort analysis of people who are
most affected by rising prices and bills, which included direct
awards such as;
1)
providing food vouchers worth £15 per week to
children and families in need during school holidays;
2)
providing payment to 6,316 households who are
receiving Housing Benefit and/or Council Tax Support, but do not
receive one of the qualifying benefits, and as such, have not
received the Cost-of-Living Payment;
i)
notes, however, that there are also children who are in receipt of
Universal Credit but who are ineligible for Free-school-meal due to
the low threshold (income of £7,400) and that consideration
needs to be given to how this cohort, expected to be around 4,000
children, can best be supported;
j) request that Strategy & Resources Policy
Committee look at fully costed proposals to help put cash in
people’s pockets at Christmas, increasing and extending
direct awards to those who most need it, with a report to Strategy
and Resources setting out further options as soon as possible.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
7.1
|
It was moved by
Councillor Fran Belbin, and seconded by Councillor Laura McClean,
that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) believes
that the Conservatives have wreaked havoc on our economy, and notes
that mortgage rates are soaring, economic growth is flat and
working people are paying the price;
|
|
|
|
(b) notes that
the UK is forecast to have the highest inflation of any major
economy this year which means rising prices, higher bills and less
money in your pocket;
|
|
|
|
(c) notes that
prices of food and non-alcoholic beverages rose by 13.6% in the
year to August 2023;
|
|
|
|
(d) notes
recent research by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation which found that
5.7 million low-income households are having to cut down or skip
meals because they don’t have enough money for food;
|
|
|
|
(e) notes that
lots of people across Sheffield are struggling as prices and bills
continue to rise;
|
|
|
|
(f) notes
that wintertime can be an expensive time for lots of people,
especially families;
|
|
|
|
(g) believes
that a cash-first approach is an effective, direct way to provide
financial help that trusts people to make the best choices for
them;
|
|
|
|
(h) notes that
in July 2023, the Strategy and Resources Committee unanimously
approved a spending plan for the Household Support Fund in 2023/24,
based on detailed cohort analysis of people who are most affected
by rising prices and bills, which included direct awards such
as;
|
|
|
|
(1) providing
food vouchers worth £15 per week to children and families in
need during school holidays; and
|
|
|
|
(2) providing
payment to 6,316 households who are receiving Housing Benefit
and/or Council Tax Support, but do not receive one of the
qualifying benefits, and as such, have not received the
Cost-of-Living Payment;
|
|
|
|
(i)
notes, however, that there are also children who are in receipt of
Universal Credit but who are ineligible for Free-school-meal due to
the low threshold (income of £7,400) and that consideration
needs to be given to how this cohort, expected to be around 4,000
children, can best be supported; and
|
|
|
|
(j)
request that Strategy and Resources Policy Committee look at fully
costed proposals to help put cash in people’s pockets at
Christmas, increasing and extending direct awards to those who most
need it, with a report to Strategy and Resources setting out
further options as soon as possible.
|
|
|
7.2
|
Whereupon, it was
moved by Councillor Ian
Horner, and seconded by
Councillor Simon
Clement-Jones, as an amendment,
that the Motion now submitted be amended by:-
|
|
|
|
1. the
addition of a new paragraph (g) as follows, and the re-lettering of
all further paragraphs accordingly:-
|
|
|
|
(g) notes that
a lack of access to transport can exacerbate poverty due to
difficulties getting to work and school on time, along with
increasing isolation and loneliness, condemns the South Yorkshire
Mayoral Combined Authority’s upcoming reduction in bus
services, and notes that the Bus Service Improvement Plan submitted
by Dan Jarvis in October 2021 was rejected by the Government due to
a ‘lack of ambition’, compared to West Yorkshire MCA
which received £70m;
|
|
|
|
2. The
...
view the full minutes text for item 7.
|
|
8. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "Financing Sheffield City Council After The Next General Election" - Given By Councillor Bernard Little And To Be Seconded by Councillor Christine Gilligan Kubo
That this Council;
(a) notes:
(i) since 2010 Sheffield City
Council has delivered £475 million of savings to off-set
budget cuts, leaving £856 less per household to spend,
compared to 2010-11 in real terms;
(ii) more Councils have forecast income less than their forecast
expenditure in 2024/25 and are considering issuing a Section
114 notice;
(iii) Unison’s head of local government says “Council finances are in the direst of states”
and “the squeeze on local budgets
means that services either vanish or are scaled
down dramatically”;
(iv) South Yorkshire NHS Integrated Care Board says “People living in the most deprived parts of South
Yorkshire will live on average 19 years more in poor health
compared to those living in the least deprived
areas”;
(b) looks forward to the
“Taxing Wealth Report” by Prof Richard Murphy of
Sheffield University Management School, which is expected to
show:
(i) our public services are
underfunded, local businesses struggle and many people are at
crisis point;
(ii) the 1% of the most wealthy and
high earners are considerably undertaxed and there is significant
scope to increase the tax paid by these groups; and that
(iii) funding for the Green New Deal is readily available,
investment in public services and the broader economy can be raised
and there is no need for any politician to claim “there is no money left” because there is a wide
range of choices on how to raise the funding that is needed;
(iv) cumulatively, the recommendations have a total tax-raising
potential of £83.3 billion per annum to date;
(c) believes that neither
the Conservative or a potential Labour-led Government has a plan to
ensure Councils are properly funded to deliver front-line services
to the public;
(d) resolves to ask the
relevant Policy Committees to consider placing on their work
programs consideration of the following;
(i) backing income-generating
schemes like the Employers’ Workplace Parking Levy, and
review parking fees and charges, to help fund public transport,
road safety and active travel measures;
(ii) investigating establishing a
wholly-owned Council company to help deliver the council’s
objectives and raise income to deliver reliable services for
Sheffield residents e.g. gardening, household repairs, heating system servicing and
replacement and retrofit works;
(iii) every opportunity for investing in renewable energy projects
on Council land and buildings to generate energy and income;
(e) further resolves that
the Council write to both Keir Starmer and Rishi Sunak, calling for
the proper funding of Councils to deliver local services and to
implement the recommendations of the Taxing Wealth Report to date,
and consider any future recommendations.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
8.1
|
It was moved by
Councillor Bernard Little, and seconded by Councillor Brian
Holmshaw, that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) notes:-
|
|
|
|
(i) since
2010 Sheffield City Council has delivered £475 million of
savings to off-set budget cuts, leaving £856 less per
household to spend, compared to 2010-11 in real terms;
|
|
|
|
(ii) more
Councils have forecast income less than their forecast expenditure
in 2024/25 and are considering issuing a Section 114 notice;
|
|
|
|
(iii)
Unison’s head of local government says “Council
finances are in the direst of states” and “the
squeeze on local budgets means that services either vanish or are
scaled down dramatically”; and
|
|
|
|
(iv) South
Yorkshire NHS Integrated Care Board says “People living in
the most deprived parts of South Yorkshire will live on average 19
years more in poor health compared to those living in the least
deprived areas”;
|
|
|
|
(b) looks
forward to the “Taxing Wealth Report” by Prof. Richard
Murphy of Sheffield University Management School, which is expected
to show:
|
|
|
|
(i)
our public services are underfunded, local businesses struggle and
many people are at crisis point;
|
|
|
|
(ii) the
1% of the most wealthy and high earners are considerably undertaxed
and there is significant scope to increase the tax paid by these
groups; and that
|
|
|
|
(iii) funding
for the Green New Deal is readily available, investment in public
services and the broader economy can be raised and there is no need
for any politician to claim “there is no money left”
because there is a wide range of choices on how to raise the
funding that is needed; and
|
|
|
|
(iv)
cumulatively, the recommendations have a total tax-raising
potential of £83.3 billion per annum to date;
|
|
|
|
(c) believes
that neither the Conservative or a potential Labour-led Government
has a plan to ensure Councils are properly funded to deliver
front-line services to the public;
|
|
|
|
(d) resolves to
ask the relevant Policy Committees to consider placing on their
work programmes consideration of the following:-
|
|
|
|
(i)
backing income-generating schemes like the Employers’
Workplace Parking Levy, and review parking fees and charges, to
help fund public transport, road safety and active travel
measures;
|
|
|
|
(ii)
investigating establishing a wholly-owned Council company to help
deliver the Council’s objectives and raise income to deliver
reliable services for Sheffield residents, e.g. gardening,
household repairs, heating system servicing and replacement and
retrofit works; and
|
|
|
|
(iii) every
opportunity for investing in renewable energy projects on Council
land and buildings to generate energy and income; and
|
|
|
|
(e) further
resolves that the Council write to both Keir Starmer and Rishi
Sunak, calling for the proper funding of Councils to deliver local
services and to implement the recommendations of the Taxing Wealth
Report to date, and consider any future recommendations.
|
|
|
8.2
|
Whereupon, it was
moved by Councillor Tom
Hunt, and seconded by
Councillor Sioned-Mair
Richards, as an amendment, that
the Motion now submitted be amended by the deletion of
paragraph (b) and the addition of a new paragraph (b) as
follows:-
|
|
|
|
(b) notes the forthcoming
report by Prof. Richard ...
view the full minutes text for item 8.
|
|
9. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "Preventing Another Birmingham" - Given By Councillor Mike Levery And To Be Seconded By Councillor Shaffaq Mohammed
That this council:-
a)
notes with concern several recent high-profile
Section 114 notices, particularly in Birmingham;
b)
notes that Government funding has squeezed
councils’ budgets over recent years, although, as with
Birmingham, in Sheffield there are other factors;
c)
notes that of the £70m reserves set aside in
2021/22 to cover overspends and balance future budgets:-
a.
the Co-Operative Executive, during the final year of
the strong leader model, used £19.8m to cover the 21/22
budget overspend, and £15m to balance the 22/23
budget;
b.
since then, under the committee system and no
overall control, £5m was used to cover the 22/23 budget
overspend, and no reserves were used to balance the 23/24 budget,
leaving approximately £30m to cover future
deficits;
d)
believes that:-
a.
had the spending profile of 21/22 been repeated in
22/23, the remaining reserves would have been exhausted;
b.
this outcome would have forced the Council to draw
on the £12.8m of un-earmarked reserves, which would have been
insufficient to balance the Council’s budget for 23/24, and
the Council would have been required to investigate further
financial resources;
e)
believes the introduction of the committee system
and Liberal Democrat involvement has led to significantly improved
financial management, as evidenced above;
f)
however, there are Budget Improvement Plans (BIPs)
not delivered within Policy Committee Budgets and notes in
particular the:-
a.
Education, Children and Families Committee, for
which 55% of the committee’s BIP’s are not deliverable
this year;
b.
Housing Revenue Account, within which £3.1m of
the account’s £19.7m savings are not deliverable this
year, including £1.5m of savings improving void rent loss and
£0.9m savings in disrepair management, despite a 23% increase
in the repairs budget;
g)
notes that construction inflation is compromising
the Stock Increase Programme, and believes the Council must
consider alternative approaches to increasing affordable housing,
including closer work with Housing Associations;
h)
therefore, resolves that the Council
implement:-
(i)
a relentless focus on delivering this year’s
budget and BIP initiatives;
(ii)
a commitment for all budgets from the start of
2025/26 to include no undeliverable BIP’s;
(iii) a budget
setting and BIP process that clearly identifies the quarter in
2024/25 that each BIP will impact, and the part year savings
clearly identified if not at the start of the financial
year;
(iv) a clear plan on how BIP savings will be
delivered.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
9.1
|
It was moved by
Councillor Mike Levery, and seconded by Councillor Shaffaq
Mohammed, that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) notes with concern several
recent high-profile Section 114 notices, particularly in
Birmingham;
|
|
|
|
(b) notes that Government
funding has squeezed councils’ budgets over recent years,
although, as with Birmingham, in Sheffield there are other
factors;
|
|
|
|
(c) notes that of the
£70m reserves set aside in 2021/22 to cover overspends and
balance future budgets:-
|
|
|
|
(i) the Co-Operative
Executive, during the final year of the strong leader model, used
£19.8m to cover the 21/22 budget overspend, and £15m to
balance the 22/23 budget; and
|
|
|
|
(ii) since then, under
the committee system and no overall control, £5m was used to
cover the 22/23 budget overspend, and no reserves were used to
balance the 23/24 budget, leaving approximately £30m to cover
future deficits;
|
|
|
|
(d) believes that:-
|
|
|
|
(i) had the spending
profile of 21/22 been repeated in 22/23, the remaining reserves
would have been exhausted; and
|
|
|
|
(ii) this outcome would
have forced the Council to draw on the £12.8m of un-earmarked
reserves, which would have been insufficient to balance the
Council’s budget for 23/24, and the Council would have been
required to investigate further financial resources;
|
|
|
|
(e) believes the introduction
of the committee system and Liberal Democrat involvement has led to
significantly improved financial management, as evidenced
above;
|
|
|
|
(f) however, there are
Budget Improvement Plans (BIPs) not delivered within Policy
Committee Budgets and notes in particular the:-
|
|
|
|
(i) Education, Children
and Families Committee, for which 55% of the Committee’s BIPs
are not deliverable this year; and
|
|
|
|
(ii) Housing Revenue
Account, within which £3.1m of the account’s
£19.7m savings are not deliverable this year, including
£1.5m of savings improving void rent loss and £0.9m
savings in disrepair management, despite a 23% increase in the
repairs budget;
|
|
|
|
(g) notes that construction
inflation is compromising the Stock Increase Programme, and
believes the Council must consider alternative approaches to
increasing affordable housing, including closer work with Housing
Associations; and
|
|
|
|
(h) therefore, resolves that
the Council implement:-
|
|
|
|
(i) a relentless focus
on delivering this year’s budget and BIP initiatives;
|
|
|
|
(ii) a commitment for all
budgets from the start of 2025/26 to include no undeliverable
BIPs;
|
|
|
|
(iii) a budget setting and BIP
process that clearly identifies the quarter in 2024/25 that each
BIP will impact, and the part year savings clearly identified if
not at the start of the financial year; and
|
|
|
|
(iv) a clear plan on how BIP
savings will be delivered.
|
|
|
9.2
|
Whereupon, it was
moved by Councillor Zahira
Naz, and seconded by Councillor
Mary Lea, as an amendment, that the Motion now submitted be
amended by:-
|
|
|
|
1. the
addition of the following content at the end of paragraph (b)
– “and in particular:-
|
|
|
|
(i)
notes that since 2010 Sheffield has suffered from 13 years of
austerity from the Coalition and Conservative
governments;
|
|
|
|
(ii)
notes that this Council’s funding has been cut by 29%, or
£856 per resident in real terms since
2010, compared to the national average of 20% and ...
view the full minutes text for item 9.
|
|
10. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "Protecting Sheffield From Dangerous Dogs" - Given By Councillor Tom Hunt And To Be Seconded By Councillor Mike Chaplin
That this Council:-
(a) welcomes the efforts of
responsible dog owners in Sheffield who train their dogs properly
resulting in well behaved dogs which offer companionship and
enhance our communities;
(b) notes the positive
contribution made by responsible dog breeders which enable owners
to select healthy well-adjusted dogs;
(c) however, believes we
cannot ignore the appalling evidence and increasing number of dog
related incidents and the harm they cause - to children and adults,
as well as pets, wildlife and livestock;
(d) notes that nationally
around 9,000 people a year are admitted to hospital with severe dog
bites - up from 7,500 in 2017 - costing the NHS an estimated
£71 million;
(e) notes with alarm the
recent horrific dog attacks in Sheffield and around the
country;
(f) believes we have
seen too many devastating injuries from dogs, with shocking
life-changing injuries sustained for both adults and young
children;
(g) notes that South Yorkshire
Police have seen the number of dog related incidents double in five
years and in the first three months of 2023 they found that XL
Bullies accounted for 25% of aggressive dogs seized;
(h) believes that dangerous
dogs put our dedicated, hardworking Sheffield City Council staff
and key workers, including homecare assistants and postal workers,
at risk and in needless danger;
therefore this Council:
(i) condemns illegal dog
breeding and puppy farming;
(ii) calls on government
to implement the ban on XL bullies without delay.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
10.1
|
It was moved by
Councillor Tom
Hunt, and seconded by Councillor
Mike Chaplin, that
this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) welcomes
the efforts of responsible dog owners in Sheffield who train their
dogs properly resulting in well behaved dogs which offer
companionship and enhance our communities;
|
|
|
|
(b) notes
the positive contribution made by responsible dog breeders which
enable owners to select healthy well-adjusted dogs;
|
|
|
|
(c) however,
believes we cannot ignore the appalling evidence and increasing
number of dog related incidents and the harm they cause - to
children and adults, as well as pets, wildlife and
livestock;
|
|
|
|
(d) notes
that nationally around 9,000 people a year are admitted to hospital
with severe dog bites - up from 7,500 in 2017 - costing the NHS an
estimated £71 million;
|
|
|
|
(e) notes
with alarm the recent horrific dog attacks in Sheffield and around
the country;
|
|
|
|
(f)
believes we have seen too many devastating injuries from dogs, with
shocking life-changing injuries sustained for both adults and young
children;
|
|
|
|
(g) notes
that South Yorkshire Police have seen the number of dog related
incidents double in five years and in the first three months of
2023 they found that XL Bullies accounted for 25% of aggressive
dogs seized;
|
|
|
|
(h) believes
that dangerous dogs put our dedicated, hardworking Sheffield City
Council staff and key workers, including homecare assistants and
postal workers, at risk and in needless danger; and
|
|
|
|
therefore this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(i) condemns
illegal dog breeding and puppy farming; and
|
|
|
|
(ii) calls on the
Government to implement the ban on XL bullies without
delay.
|
|
|
10.2
|
Whereupon, it was formally moved by Councillor
Joe Otten, and formally seconded by
Councillor Sue Alston, as an amendment, that
the Motion now submitted be amended by the addition of new
paragraphs (i) to (l) as follows:-
|
|
|
|
(i) recognises that
ambiguity around the definition of the XL bully and similar dogs,
with or without a ban, poses additional challenges for dog control and animal care officers,
alongside additional demands on the service as more potentially
dangerous animals are likely to be rejected by their owners;
|
|
|
|
(j) condemns the illegal
and barbaric practice of dog fighting, which contributes to the
criminal breeding of highly aggressive dogs;
|
|
|
|
(k) highly appreciates the
good work by dog rescue charities to find homes for unwanted dogs, often working with dogs with
difficult behaviour;
|
|
|
|
(l) welcomes the new
kennelling strategy agreed by the Waste and Street Scene Policy
Committee, which will improve the conditions which dogs under the
Council’s care are kept in, and deliver a cost saving of
£54k per year;
|
|
|
10.3
|
It was then formally
moved by Councillor Douglas Johnson, and formally seconded by
Councillor Martin Phipps, as an amendment, that the Motion now submitted
be amended by:-
|
|
|
|
1. the addition of a
new paragraph (c) as follows, and the re-lettering of all further
paragraphs accordingly:-
|
|
|
|
(c) thanks dog shelters,
charities and rescuers for their work caring for rescue dogs, and
finding and supporting suitable new owners for them, and encourages
those ...
view the full minutes text for item 10.
|
|
11. |
Minutes of Previous Council Meeting PDF 305 KB
To receive the record of the
proceedings of the meeting of the Council held on 6th
September 2023 and to approve the accuracy thereof.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
11.1
|
RESOLVED
UNANIMOUSLY: On the motion formally moved by Councillor Sioned-Mair
Richards and formally seconded by Councillor Joe Otten, that the
minutes of the ordinary meeting of the Council held on 6th
September 2023 be approved as a true and accurate
record.
|
|
|
|