Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Minute's Silence - Deaths of Former Councillors Jim Bamford and Graham Oxley
Additional documents:
Minutes:
1.1
|
The Lord Mayor
(Councillor Jayne Dunn) reported with sadness, the death, on 29th
November 2024, of former Councillor Graham Oxley who had served as
a Member of the Council from 1999 to 2010, representing the East
Ecclesfield Ward and was Lord Mayor of Sheffield in
2009/10.
|
|
|
1.2
|
She also reported
the recent death of former Councillor Jim Bamford, who had served
on the Council from 1995 to 1999.
|
|
|
1.3
|
Members of the Council observed a
minute’s silence in memory of former Councillors Oxley and
Bamford. After the completion of the
business of the meeting, several Members of the Council spoke to
pay tribute to those former Councillors.
|
|
|
|
2. |
Apologies for Absence
Additional documents:
Minutes:
2.1
|
Apologies for absence were received from
Councillors Nighat Basharat, Nikki Belfield, Denise Fox, Mark
Jones, Nabeela Mowlana, Zahira Naz, Maroof Raouf, William Sapwell,
Garry Weatherall, Cliff Woodcraft, Ann Woolhouse and John
Wright.
|
|
|
|
3. |
Exclusion of the Press and Public
To identify items where resolutions may be
moved to exclude the press and public.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
3.1
|
There were no items of business identified
where resolutions may be moved to exclude the press and public.
|
|
|
|
4. |
Declarations of Interest PDF 86 KB
Members to declare any
interests they have in the business to be considered at the
meeting.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
4.1
|
Councillor Douglas Johnson declared a personal
interest in item 9 on the agenda (Notice of Motion regarding
“Protect Our Rivers”) (item 9 of these minutes) on the
grounds that he serves as a Director of the River Stewardship
Company, having been appointed to that role by the Council.
|
|
|
|
5. |
Public Petitions, Questions and Statements and Other Communications PDF 81 KB
(a) To
receive any petitions, questions or statements from the public, or
communications submitted by the Lord Mayor, the Leader of the
Council, or the Chief Executive, and to pass such resolutions
thereon as the Council Procedure Rules permit and as may be deemed
expedient.
NOTE: There is a time limit of one hour for the
presentation of ordinary petitions and questions or statements
submitted by members of the public. The
order for receiving public participations within the allotted time
is – 1) Petitions; 2) Agenda-Related Questions; 3)
Supplementary Questions to the (Written) Remit Questions; 4)
Statements (Agenda-related & Remit).
In accordance with the arrangements published on the
Council’s website and contained within the Council’s
Scheme “Public involvement in decision making at Sheffield
City Council”, petitions, questions and statements are required
to be submitted in writing to publicquestions@sheffield.gov.uk, by 9.00 a.m. on the dates set out
here:Meeting
Dates and Deadlines.
(b) Petition
Requiring Debate
The Council’s Petitions
Scheme requires that a petition containing over 5,000 signatures
from individuals who live, work or study in Sheffield, be the
subject of debate at the Council meeting. A qualifying petition has
been received as follows:-
Petition Regarding the Shortage of Burial Space in
Sheffield
To debate a joint paper and
electronic petition containing 7,000 signatures (4,745 paper and
2,255 electronic signatures, as at 26th November), submitted on
behalf of the South Yorkshire Muslim Bereavement Trust, regarding
the shortage of burial space in Sheffield. The petition asks for “immediate action
to tackle the dire situation that exists with regard to the
depleting burial space/provision in Sheffield by the delivery of
available, affordable and appropriate new burial space/provision in
Sheffield, for all communities, and particularly for the Muslim
community, within the next 24 months”. The online
petition -
Petition · EMERGENCY PETITION Burial Site Provision -
Sheffield - Sheffield, United Kingdom · Change.org -
includes further information.
There
is a time limit of 25 minutes for this debate.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
5.1
|
Lord
Mayor’s Communications
|
|
|
|
The Lord Mayor (Councillor Jayne Dunn,)
reported that Members could donate to the yearly collection for the
Archer Project via a Just Giving page, and that Women of Steel
prints were available to purchase online or from the Cathedral gift
shop with proceeds going to the Archer Project and Roundabout.
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
Public
Petitions, Questions and Statements
|
|
|
|
The Lord Mayor
reported that no ordinary petitions had been received for the
meeting, but that a petition containing over 5,000 signatures would
be debated at the end of this item of business, and that petition
was referred to at item 5(b) on the agenda for the
meeting. She added that no questions
had been received from members of the public on matters relating to
items of business on the agenda for the meeting, and no statements
had been received from the public. She
stated that written responses to questions received from three
members of the public on matters relating to the remit of full
Council had been provided to the questioners and published on the
Council’s website in advance of the meeting, and two
supplementary questions arising from those responses had been
received.
|
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
Supplementary Public Questions
|
|
|
5.3.1
|
Supplementary questions, from Peter
Garbutt, regarding public awareness of the implications of climate
change
|
|
|
|
The following question, submitted by Peter
Garbutt, was read out by the Chief Executive – “I
believe it's extremely important to inform the Sheffield public
about the implications of climate change. How else can they
prepare, individually and in their communities? My question is,
therefore, how does the Council propose to bring this information
to ALL the people of Sheffield?”
|
|
|
|
In response, Councillor Ben Miskell (the Chair
of the Transport, Regeneration and Climate Policy Committee) stated
that his response to Mr Garbutt’s original question was
available on the Council’s website and the answer he was
about to give should be considered alongside it as part of an
ongoing conversation.
Councillor
Miskell advised that he was aware of the research referenced by Mr
Garbutt, which highlighted the potential risks to the Gulf Stream
system of warm water currents. He
explained that Officers had advised that while there was evidence
of this risk, there remained a recognised degree of uncertainty in
the scientific community about how quickly such changes might
occur, or how reversible they would be.
This made it difficult for the Council, or indeed other subject
matter experts, to predict with any certainty the specific
implications for UK cities like Sheffield.
Councillor
Miskell added that considering that uncertainty, the Council
continued to work with partners, including the Met Office, to
deepen its understanding of the potential impacts that climate
change was having on Sheffield.
Regarding the
further question of how the Council could raise awareness among
Sheffield’s residents of the issues described, Councillor
Miskell stated that working within the constraints of budget
pressures, the Council was actively finding ways to inform and
engage as many people as possible, supporting understanding and
action on the climate emergency. ...
view the full minutes text for item 5.
|
|
6. |
Members' Questions PDF 1017 KB
6.1 Questions relating to
urgent business (submitted in accordance with Council Procedure
Rule 16.6).
6.2 Supplementary questions
(in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 16.5) - on the answers,
to be circulated at this meeting, provided to written questions
(submitted in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 16.1) to the
Leader of the Council, or any Policy Committee (or Sub-Committee)
or Regulatory Committee Chair, or a Member appointed by the Council
to serve on the South Yorkshire Joint Authorities (under the
provisions of Section 41 of the Local Government Act 1985), the
South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority, or any other external
body or joint committee, on matters within the functions of that
Body.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
6.1
|
Urgent Business
|
|
|
|
There were no questions relating to urgent
business, submitted under the provisions of Council Procedure Rule
16.6.
|
|
|
6.2
|
Written
Questions
|
|
|
6.2.1
|
A schedule of
questions, submitted in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 16,
and which contained written answers, was circulated. Members
of the Council are able to ask the Leader of the Council, or any
Policy Committee or Sub-Committee or Regulatory Committee Chairs,
or Members appointed by the Council to serve on the South Yorkshire
Joint Authorities, the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority,
or any other external body or joint committee, questions on matters
within the functions of those Bodies.
|
|
|
6.2.2
|
Supplementary
questions, under the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 16.5,
were asked by the Members who had submitted the original questions
and were answered by the relevant Member, until the expiry of the
time limit for Members’ Questions (in accordance with Council
Procedure Rule 16.7).
|
|
|
|
7. |
Gambling Act 2005 - Statement of Principles (Gambling Policy) 2025 PDF 73 KB
To approve the updated Statement of Principles
(Policy) under the Gambling Act 2005, as set out in the report of
the Executive Director, Neighbourhood Services, published with this
agenda. The Statement had been approved
for submission to the Council by the Waste and Street Scene Policy
Committee at its meeting held on 8th November
2024.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
7.1
|
On the motion moved
by Councillor Joe Otten, and formally seconded by Councillor Minesh
Parekh, and after contributions from four other Members, it
was:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED
UNANIMOUSLY: That the
Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) notes that a licensing
authority shall, before each successive period of three years, both
prepare a statement of the principles that they propose to apply in
exercising their functions under the Gambling Act 2005 during that
period, and publish that statement; and
|
|
|
|
(b) approves the draft
Statement of Principles (Policy) under the Gambling Act 2005,
recommended by the Waste and Street Scene Policy Committee, under
Part 3.2.1 of the Constitution, as set out in the report
of the Executive Director, Neighbourhood Services,
now submitted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "A Fair Deal For Social Care Providers" - Given By Councillor Sophie Thornton And To Be Seconded By Councillor Robert Reiss
That this Council:-
notes that:-
(a) from April 2025 National
Insurance employer’s contributions (NICs) will rise by
1.2%;
(b) from April 2025 the
secondary threshold will be lowered, meaning that employers will
start to pay NICs on employees’ earnings from £5,000
instead of the current £9,100;
(c) the Chancellor of the
Exchequer has recognised “there will be consequences”
as a result of the Budget announcements regarding employer
NICs;
(d) analysis from the Nuffield
Trust shows that changes to employer NICs will cost the adult
social care sector more than £900m next year;
(e) the same report shows the
total burden on the 18,000 independent organisations providing
adult social care in England will be £2.8billion in the next
financial year;
(f) Sheffield is
grappling with significant financial challenges, and the Adult
Health and Social Care Policy Committee is forecast to be
£9.5m overspent this year;
(g) in response to the
Nuffield Trust’s analysis, the Local Government Association
have stated that “immediate adequate investment is needed in
order to address unmet and under-met need and ensure timely access
to social care for all who need it”;
believes that:-
(h) subjecting social care
providers to higher taxes is counterproductive and will worsen the
health and care crisis;
(i) social care services
are provided by a range of organisations including hospices and the
voluntary sector, and all but the very smallest will be hit by the
employers’ NICs increase;
(j) the
Government’s lack of ambition and deafening silence on social
care is disappointing;
(k) GP surgeries and many
health and care providers will not be shielded from the full force
of this tax increase and will have no choice but to cut services
and staff numbers;
(l) ultimately, people
in care will suffer the consequences of these employers’ NICs
rises;
resolves to:-
(m) call on the Government to exempt
social care providers from the increase in employers’
NICs;
(n) call for cross-party talks
on social care immediately to deliver the sector long-term,
sustainable funding; and
(o) ask the Leader of the
Council to forward a copy of this motion to the Chancellor of the
Exchequer.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
8.1
|
It was moved by
Councillor Sophie Thornton, and seconded by Councillor Rob Reiss,
that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
notes that:-
|
|
|
|
(a) from April
2025 National Insurance employer’s contributions (NICs) will
rise by 1.2%;
|
|
|
|
(b) from April
2025 the secondary threshold will be lowered, meaning that
employers will start to pay NICs on employees’ earnings from
£5,000 instead of the current £9,100;
|
|
|
|
(c) the
Chancellor of the Exchequer has recognised “there will be
consequences” as a result of the Budget announcements
regarding employer NICs;
|
|
|
|
(d) analysis
from the Nuffield Trust shows that changes to employer NICs will
cost the adult social care sector more than £900m next
year;
|
|
|
|
(e) the same
report shows the total burden on the 18,000 independent
organisations providing adult social care in England will be
£2.8billion in the next financial year;
|
|
|
|
(f)
Sheffield is grappling with significant financial challenges, and
the Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee is forecast to be
£9.5m overspent this year;
|
|
|
|
(g) in response
to the Nuffield Trust’s analysis, the Local Government
Association have stated that “immediate adequate investment
is needed in order to address unmet and under-met need and ensure
timely access to social care for all who need it”;
|
|
|
|
believes that:-
|
|
|
|
(h) subjecting
social care providers to higher taxes is counterproductive and will
worsen the health and care crisis;
|
|
|
|
(i)
social care services are provided by a range of organisations
including hospices and the voluntary sector, and all but the very
smallest will be hit by the employers’ NICs increase;
|
|
|
|
(j) the
Government’s lack of ambition and deafening silence on social
care is disappointing;
|
|
|
|
(k) GP
surgeries and many health and care providers will not be shielded
from the full force of this tax increase and will have no choice
but to cut services and staff numbers;
|
|
|
|
(l)
ultimately, people in care will suffer the consequences of these
employers’ NICs rises;
|
|
|
|
resolves to:-
|
|
|
|
(m) call on the
Government to exempt social care providers from the increase in
employers’ NICs;
|
|
|
|
(n) call for
cross-party talks on social care immediately to deliver the sector
long-term, sustainable funding; and
|
|
|
|
(o) ask the
Leader of the Council to forward a copy of this motion to the
Chancellor of the Exchequer.
|
|
|
8.2
|
Whereupon, it was
moved by Councillor Laura
McClean, and seconded by
Councillor Matthew Dwyer, as an amendment, that the Motion now submitted be
amended by the deletion of all the words
after the words “That this Council” and the addition of
the following new paragraphs (a) to (f):-
|
|
|
|
(a) believes that fourteen
years of cuts and fiscal mismanagement, compounded by spiralling
inflation and a failure to grow our economy, has hit public
services hard;
|
|
|
|
(b) believes the Budget sets
the country on the path to making our public services fit for the
future, but recognises that there is no quick fix, and difficult
decisions will have to be taken;
|
|
|
|
(c) notes the budget included
a £22.6 billion increase in day-to-day spending and
£3.1 billion capital boost for the Department for Health and
...
view the full minutes text for item 8.
|
|
9. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "Protect Our Rivers" - Given By Councillor David Barker And To Be Seconded By Councillor Mark Whittaker
That this Council:-
(a) notes Sheffield's identity
is directly shaped by our rivers, from powering mills and forges to
the historical driving force behind the steel and cutlery
industries;
(b) notes that today our
rivers provide natural beauty, recreational opportunities, and
habitats for diverse wildlife;
(c) believes that
Sheffield’s rivers play an important part in the city's
future;
(d) celebrates the work to
de-culvert the River Sheaf at Castlegate, to open up the River Sheaf at its
confluence with the River Don for the first time in over a century,
alongside a new public park, Sheaf Fields, celebrating the
birthplace of our city;
(e) believes that the
country’s rivers and seas face significant challenges after
14 years of neglect under Conservative-led governments;
(f) condemns the record
levels of sewage pumped into Britain’s rivers in 2023, with
Yorkshire Water discharging sewage into Sheffield’s rivers
4,781 times, a 33% increase from the previous year, totalling over
18,000 hours of discharge;
(g) notes that earlier this
year, Yorkshire Water paid a penalty of £150,000 for
pollution incidents affecting the River Don;
(h) thanks the many local organisations and volunteers
throughout the city who commit time and effort to protect and
celebrate our waterways;
(i) welcomes the
Government's announcements to crack down on polluting water
companies, increasing the ability of the Environment Agency to
bring forward criminal charges against water executives, increased
penalties for polluters, and independent monitoring of every sewage
outlet;
(j) welcomes the launch
of a new Independent Water Commission to review the water industry
and ensure that regulations necessary to clean up our waterways are
introduced;
resolves to:-
(k) call for Yorkshire Water
to be transparent and make a firm commitment to reducing sewage
discharges into Sheffield’s rivers and streams;
(l) request that the
Transport, Regeneration and Climate Policy Committee adds river
quality and restoration to its work programme;
(m) continue celebrating and
supporting the invaluable work of local groups protecting our
rivers, ensuring they are central to Sheffield’s climate and
environmental priorities; and
(n) ask the Chief Executive to
forward a copy of this motion to Yorkshire Water.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
9.1
|
It was moved by
Councillor David Barker, and seconded by Councillor Mark Whittaker,
that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) notes
Sheffield's identity is directly shaped by our rivers, from
powering mills and forges to the historical driving force behind
the steel and cutlery industries;
|
|
|
|
(b) notes that
today our rivers provide natural beauty, recreational
opportunities, and habitats for diverse wildlife;
|
|
|
|
(c) believes
that Sheffield’s rivers play an important part in the city's
future;
|
|
|
|
(d) celebrates
the work to de-culvert the River Sheaf at Castlegate, to open up
the River Sheaf at its confluence with the River Don for the first
time in over a century, alongside a new public park, Sheaf Fields,
celebrating the birthplace of our city;
|
|
|
|
(e) believes
that the country’s rivers and seas face significant
challenges after 14 years of neglect under Conservative-led
governments;
|
|
|
|
(f)
condemns the record levels of sewage pumped into Britain’s
rivers in 2023, with Yorkshire Water discharging sewage into
Sheffield’s rivers 4,781 times, a 33% increase from the
previous year, totalling over 18,000 hours of discharge;
|
|
|
|
(g) notes that
earlier this year, Yorkshire Water paid a penalty of £150,000
for pollution incidents affecting the River Don;
|
|
|
|
(h) thanks the
many local organisations and volunteers throughout the city who
commit time and effort to protect and celebrate our waterways;
|
|
|
|
(i)
welcomes the Government's announcements to crack down on polluting
water companies, increasing the ability of the Environment Agency
to bring forward criminal charges against water executives,
increased penalties for polluters, and independent monitoring of
every sewage outlet;
|
|
|
|
(j)
welcomes the launch of a new Independent Water Commission to review
the water industry and ensure that regulations necessary to clean
up our waterways are introduced;
|
|
|
|
resolves to:-
|
|
|
|
(k) call for
Yorkshire Water to be transparent and make a firm commitment to
reducing sewage discharges into Sheffield’s rivers and
streams;
|
|
|
|
(l)
request that the Transport, Regeneration and Climate and
Communities, Parks and Leisure Policy Committees add river quality
and restoration to their work programme;
|
|
|
|
(m) continue
celebrating and supporting the invaluable work of local groups
protecting our rivers, ensuring they are central to
Sheffield’s climate and environmental priorities; and
|
|
|
|
(n) ask the
Chief Executive to forward a copy of this motion to Yorkshire
Water.
|
|
|
9.1.1
|
(NOTE: With the agreement of the Council and
at the request of the mover of the Motion (Councillor David Barker), the Motion as published on the
agenda was altered by the addition of reference to the Communities,
Parks and Leisure Policy Committee in paragraph (l) of the
Motion.)
|
|
|
9.2
|
Whereupon, it was
moved by Councillor Joe
Otten, and seconded by
Councillor Barbara Masters, as an amendment, that the Motion now submitted be
amended by:-
|
|
|
|
1. the addition of a
new paragraph (f) as follows, and the re-lettering of the original
paragraphs (f) to (i) as new paragraphs (g) to (j):-
|
|
|
|
(f) notes that according
to the Rivers Trust, 35% of England’s rivers fail to
meet
‘good condition’ due to treated sewage;
|
|
|
|
2. the addition of new
paragraphs (k) to ...
view the full minutes text for item 9.
|
|
10. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "Supporting New Employment Rights for Sheffield Workers" - Given By Councillor Ibby Ullah And To Be Seconded By Councillor Karen McGowan
That this Council:-
(a) supports the
Government’s new landmark Employment Rights Bill that will
help workers in Sheffield by taking steps to make work pay and
upgrade workers’ rights;
(b) welcomes measures in the
Bill to provide protection against unfair dismissal from day one,
establish parental and bereavement leave from day one, end
unscrupulous practices of fire and rehire and fire and replace,
make flexible working the norm where practical, deliver stronger
protections for pregnant women and new mothers, and strengthen
statutory sick pay;
(c) notes that thousands of
workers in Sheffield are currently employed on a zero-hour
contract, and believes that the ending of exploitative zero-hour
contracts and strengthening of employment rights will be a big help
to many;
(d) supports the measures in
the Bill to establish a new Fair Work Agency to enforce employment
rights, such as holiday pay, and to provide support and guidance
for employers;
(e) supports the
Government’s commitment to increasing the national living
wage by 6.7% to increase pay for thousands of working people in
Sheffield;
(f) supports measures in
the Bill to modernise trade union laws to help unions in their
vital role representing workers’ interests and improving
working conditions, including introducing rights for trade unions
to access workplaces and repealing restrictive legislation;
(g) recognises analysis by the
Trades Union Congress which shows the benefit to the economy of
reducing workplace stress, improving staff well-being, improving
minimum wage compliance and increasing labour market participation;
resolves to:-
(h) thank trade union
convenors for their work at Sheffield City Council, noting the
positive work they do for both employees and employer, including
promoting workplace wellbeing and providing representation, support
and advocacy;
(i) commit to work with
businesses, partners, unions and residents to grow the economy of
Sheffield and increase productivity, wages and jobs growth; and
(j) affirm our
commitment to promoting fair and equitable employment practices in
Sheffield.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
10.1
|
It was moved by
Councillor Fran Belbin, and seconded by Councillor Karen McGowan,
that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) supports
the Government’s new landmark Employment Rights Bill that
will help workers in Sheffield by taking steps to make work pay and
upgrade workers’ rights;
|
|
|
|
(b) welcomes
measures in the Bill to provide protection against unfair dismissal
from day one, establish parental and bereavement leave from day
one, end unscrupulous practices of fire and rehire and fire and
replace, make flexible working the norm where practical, deliver
stronger protections for pregnant women and new mothers, and
strengthen statutory sick pay;
|
|
|
|
(c) notes that
thousands of workers in Sheffield are currently employed on a
zero-hour contract, and believes that the ending of exploitative
zero-hour contracts and strengthening of employment rights will be
a big help to many;
|
|
|
|
(d) supports
the measures in the Bill to establish a new Fair Work Agency to
enforce employment rights, such as holiday pay, and to provide
support and guidance for employers;
|
|
|
|
(e) supports
the Government’s commitment to increasing the national living
wage by 6.7% to increase pay for thousands of working people in
Sheffield;
|
|
|
|
(f)
supports measures in the Bill to modernise trade union laws to help
unions in their vital role representing workers’ interests
and improving working conditions, including introducing rights for
trade unions to access workplaces and repealing restrictive
legislation;
|
|
|
|
(g) recognises
analysis by the Trades Union Congress which shows the benefit to
the economy of reducing workplace stress, improving staff
well-being, improving minimum wage compliance and increasing labour
market participation;
|
|
|
|
resolves to:-
|
|
|
|
(h) thank trade
union convenors for their work at Sheffield City Council, noting
the positive work they do for both employees and employer,
including promoting workplace wellbeing and providing
representation, support and advocacy;
|
|
|
|
(i)
commit to work with businesses, partners, unions and residents to
grow the economy of Sheffield and increase productivity, wages and
jobs growth; and
|
|
|
|
(j)
affirm our commitment to promoting fair and equitable employment
practices in Sheffield.
|
|
|
10.2
|
Whereupon, it was
moved by Councillor Kurtis
Crossland, and seconded by
Councillor Simon
Clement-Jones, as an amendment,
that the Motion now submitted be amended by:-
|
|
|
|
1. the addition of new
paragraphs (c) and (d) as follows, and the re-lettering of the
original paragraph (c) as a new paragraph (e):-
|
|
|
|
(c) supports Liberal Democrat
MPs’ amendments to the Bill including setting out
entitlement to
kinship care leave and requiring companies with more than 250
employees to publish information about their parental leave and pay
policies;
|
|
|
|
(d) notes that, according to
the Local Government Association, costs resulting from the Bill will
exacerbate service pressures in local authorities unless they are
matched by increased funding;
|
|
|
|
2. in newly re-lettered
paragraph (e) [the original paragraph (c)], the deletion of all the
words following the words “zero-hour
contract”;
|
|
|
|
3. the addition of a
new paragraph (f) as follows:-
|
|
|
|
(f) believes that we
should find ways to improve rights and conditions for those on
zero-hour contracts such as establishing a new ‘dependent
contractor’ status with
...
view the full minutes text for item 10.
|
|
11. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "Bringing Back Our Buses" - Given By Councillor Andrew Sangar And To Be Seconded By Councillor Ian Horner
That this Council:-
notes:-
(a) the ongoing bus reform
consultation by the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority
(SYMCA) towards bus reform, including initiating a public
consultation with franchising as the preferred option;
(b) that South Yorkshire only
receives £10 per resident of funding towards buses, compared
to almost £40 in West Yorkshire;
(c) that the bus fare cap will
be raised nationally from £2 to £3 from January which
would mean the average commuter who takes the bus every working day
of the week would face an extra £448 bill in 2025;
(d) that local leaders in
Liverpool, Manchester, and West Yorkshire have pledged to keep the
£2 fare cap for at least three months of next year, but that
the Mayor of South Yorkshire has not made the same pledge;
(e) that South Yorkshire
received less Bus Service Improvement Plan revenue funding for
2025/26 than Liverpool City Region, despite having a similar total
population;
believes that:-
(f) the current system
of deregulated buses has failed our city, and improvements to our
bus network are desperately needed;
(g) local authorities should
be granted the powers they need to restore bus routes and add new
ones where there is local need;
(h) the fare cap increase is
like a bus tax for people across Sheffield which will impact users
struggling to make ends meet as well as local businesses and high
streets;
(i) the money received
through Bus Service Improvement Plan revenue funding should be used
to restore routes that have been previously cut;
resolves to:-
(j) call on the Mayor of
South Yorkshire to retain the £2 bus fare cap until at least
December 2025;
(k) encourage members of the
public to take part in the bus reform consultation which can be
accessed at the SYMCA website; and
(l) ask the Chief
Executive to forward a copy of this motion to the Mayor of South
Yorkshire.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
11.1
|
It was formally
moved by Councillor Andrew Sangar, and formally seconded by
Councillor Ian Horner, that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
notes:-
|
|
|
|
(a) the ongoing
bus reform consultation by the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined
Authority (SYMCA) towards bus reform, including initiating a public
consultation with franchising as the preferred option;
|
|
|
|
(b) that South
Yorkshire only receives £10 per resident of funding towards
buses, compared to almost £40 in West Yorkshire;
|
|
|
|
(c) that the
bus fare cap will be raised nationally from £2 to £3
from January which would mean the average commuter who takes the
bus every working day of the week would face an extra £448
bill in 2025;
|
|
|
|
(d) that local
leaders in Liverpool, Manchester, and West Yorkshire have pledged
to keep the £2 fare cap for at least three months of next
year, but that the Mayor of South Yorkshire has not made the same
pledge;
|
|
|
|
(e) that South
Yorkshire received less Bus Service Improvement Plan revenue
funding for 2025/26 than Liverpool City Region, despite having a
similar total population;
|
|
|
|
believes that:-
|
|
|
|
(f) the
current system of deregulated buses has failed our city, and
improvements to our bus network are desperately needed;
|
|
|
|
(g) local
authorities should be granted the powers they need to restore bus
routes and add new ones where there is local need;
|
|
|
|
(h) the fare
cap increase is like a bus tax for people across Sheffield which
will impact users struggling to make ends meet as well as local
businesses and high streets;
|
|
|
|
(i) the
money received through Bus Service Improvement Plan revenue funding
should be used to restore routes that have been previously cut;
|
|
|
|
resolves to:-
|
|
|
|
(j) call
on the Mayor of South Yorkshire to retain the £2 bus fare cap
until at least December 2025;
|
|
|
|
(k) encourage
members of the public to take part in the bus reform consultation
which can be accessed at the SYMCA website; and
|
|
|
|
(l) ask
the Chief Executive to forward a copy of this motion to the Mayor
of South Yorkshire.
|
|
|
11.2
|
Whereupon, it was
formally moved by Councillor Ben
Miskell, and formally seconded by
Councillor Craig Gamble
Pugh, as an amendment, that the
Motion now submitted be amended by the
deletion of all the words after the words “That this
Council” and the addition of the following new paragraphs (a)
to (h):-
|
|
|
|
(a) notes that the £2
bus fare cap was due to end on 31 December, with no funds provided
by the previous government to continue it;
|
|
|
|
(b) notes that the new
Government has introduced a £3 fare cap until the end of
2025;
|
|
|
|
(c) notes that average single
fares are expected to remain below £3, and passengers may get
best value from buying returns, weekly, monthly, or multi-operator
tickets that are more affordable and flexible;
|
|
|
|
(d) welcomes the
Government’s recent announcement of £17.6 million
funding for South Yorkshire’s bus service;
|
|
|
|
(e) welcomes the comments from
the Mayor of South Yorkshire that the additional funding will help
to protect the network;
|
|
|
|
(f) supports bringing
buses ...
view the full minutes text for item 11.
|
|
12. |
Allocation of Seats on Council Committees in 2024-25 - Update PDF 185 KB
To approve a new politically proportionate
scheme of seat allocations on the Council’s Committees, in
accordance with details to be circulated at the meeting, following
a change to the composition of the Council resulting from the
By-Election held in the Woodhouse Ward on 28th November 2024.
A report of the Director of
Policy and Democratic Engagement on the review of the allocation of
seats on the Council’s Committees, will be published prior to
the meeting.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
12.1
|
On the motion
formally moved by Councillor Joe Otten, and formally seconded by
Councillor Dianne Hurst, and after a contribution from Councillor Martin
Phipps, it was:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED: That this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) notes the
impact on the allocation of seats on Council Committees of the new
political composition of the Council, following the result of the
Woodhouse Ward By-Election held on 28th November 2024, as set out
in the report of the Director of Policy and Democratic Engagement
now submitted;
|
|
|
|
(b) notes the
initial allocation of seats to political groups on individual
committees before final adjustment, as set out in Appendix 1 of the
report, and which is based on the committees (and their sizes)
which were approved at the annual meeting of the Council on 15th
May 2024 for operation in the Municipal Year 2024-25;
|
|
|
|
(c) in order to
satisfy the requirement to ensure that each group has the required
number of seats overall in comparison to the total number of seats
available on all committees to reflect their composition on the
Council as a whole, approves (i) the
final adjustments of seven seats as shown in the schedule
circulated at the meeting and (ii) revised appointments of
Councillors to give effect to the new seat allocations and reflect
the wishes of the political groups, as follows:-
|
|
|
|
Councillor Willis
Marshall to fill a vacancy on the Communities, Parks and Leisure
Policy Committee;
|
|
Councillor Gail Smith
to fill a vacancy on the Licensing Committee;
|
|
|
|
(d) for the
purposes of Council Procedure Rule 25.6, gives the consent of the
Council in any case where a Member
chooses not to be appointed to serve on any Policy or Regulatory
Committee; and
|
|
|
|
(e) notes that,
as respects the appointment of Members to serve on Council
Committees, where vacancies exist or in cases of urgency to ensure
quoracy or representation, the Monitoring Officer, in consultation
with the relevant political group whip, has the authority to
appoint Members to serve on such Committees, as necessary, on the
understanding that details of such appointments will be reported to
the next or subsequent meetings of the Council.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1.1
|
(NOTE: The result of
the vote was FOR - 57 Members; AGAINST - 11 Members; ABSTENTIONS
– 1 Member.)
|
|
|
|
13. |
Memberships of Council Bodies, Representatives to Serve on Other Bodies and Related Issues PDF 45 KB
To consider any changes to the
memberships and arrangements for meetings of Committees etc.,
delegated authority, and the appointment of representatives to
serve on other bodies, which may be proposed at the
meeting.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
13.1
|
RESOLVED
UNANIMOUSLY: On the motion
formally moved by Councillor Mary Lea and formally seconded by
Councillor Joe Otten, that:-
|
|
|
|
(a) Councillor Mark Rusling be
appointed as Deputy Chair of the Waste and Street Scene Policy
Committee in place of Councillor Minesh Parekh;
|
|
|
|
(b) Councillor Barbara Masters be appointed to
fill a vacancy on the Sheffield Conservation Advisory Group; and
|
|
|
|
(c) Councillor Rob Bannister be appointed to
serve on the Governance Committee in place of Councillor Mark Rusling.
|
|
|
|
(NOTE: The above
appointments incorporate the appointment of Councillor Rob
Bannister to replace Councillor Mark Rusling on
the Governance Committee, which
was reported to the meeting by the Lord Mayor as an addition to the
schedule of appointments circulated to the meeting.)
|
|
|
|
14. |
Minutes Of Previous Council Meeting PDF 422 KB
To receive the record of the
proceedings of the meeting of the Council held on 6th November 2024
and to approve the accuracy thereof.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
14.1
|
RESOLVED
UNANIMOUSLY: On the motion
formally moved by Councillor Mary Lea and formally seconded by
Councillor Joe Otten, that the minutes of the ordinary meeting of
the Council held on 6th November 2024 be approved as a true and
accurate record.
|
|
|
|