Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Apologies for Absence
Additional documents:
Minutes:
1.1
|
Apologies for absence were received from
Councillors Sue Auckland, Simon Clement-Jones, Ben Curran, Dawn
Dale, Neale Gibson, Francyne Johnson, Bernard Little, Bob McCann,
Joe Otten, Ruth Mersereau, Moya O’Rourke, Martin Phipps,
Colin Ross, Jack Scott, Sophie Thornton, Richard Williams, Paul
Wood and Ann Woolhouse.
|
|
|
|
2. |
Declarations of Interest PDF 129 KB
Members to declare any
interests they have in the business to be considered at the
meeting.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
2.1
|
There were no declarations of interest made by
Members of the Council.
|
|
|
|
3. |
Members' Questions Relating To Urgent Business
In accordance with Council Procedure Rule
16.6(ii), Members, with the permission of the Lord
Mayor, may ask questions relating to urgent business, of which
notice in writing has been given to the Chief Executive not later
than 12.00 noon on the day of the meeting.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
3.1
|
There were no questions relating to urgent
business under the provisions of Council Procedure Rule
16.6(ii).
|
|
|
|
4. |
Public Questions and Petitions Relating To A New Committee System Of Governance For The Council
To receive any questions or
petitions from the public relating to a new committee system of
governance for Sheffield City Council.
(NOTE: In
accordance with the arrangements published on the Council’s
website in relation to meetings of the Council held whilst public
health safety measures still apply, questions/petitions are
required to be submitted in writing, to committee@sheffield.gov.uk,
by 9.00 a.m. on Monday 21st March.)
Additional documents:
Minutes:
4.1
|
The Lord Mayor (Councillor Gail
Smith) reminded the Council of her announcement made at the
previous meeting on 2nd March that she would permit
public questions relating to the Council’s governance
arrangements to be asked at this meeting.
|
|
|
4.2
|
She reported that questions on
that subject matter from two members of the public had been
received prior to the published deadline for submission of
questions for this meeting. One of the
questioners was unable to attend the meeting and had asked that her
questions be read out at the meeting on her behalf. The Lord Mayor stated that, on this occasion, she
would use her discretion, as chair of the meeting, and permit this
in order that the questions can be asked and responded to before
Members of the Council debate the subject matter under the next
item of business on the agenda.
|
|
|
4.3
|
The Lord Mayor added that
questions on the subject matter from another member of the public
had been received immediately prior to the start of the meeting and
again she proposed to use her discretion, as chair of the meeting,
and permit the questions to be asked.
|
|
|
4.4
|
Questions From Alan Kewley
|
|
|
4.4.1
|
Following our referendum in May
2021, what difference will ordinary citizens see when the new Local
Area Committees (LACs) are implemented in May, 2022.
This referendum result was
supposed to give ordinary citizens more involvement in Council
decisions before they are implemented but these new LACs seem much
the same as previous Local Area Partnerships which were in place
from 2013 to 2021 under a different name. I attended the Council meeting in 2013 when Local
Area Partnerships were introduced to replace the previous Community
Assemblies. They used the same
boundaries but added Ward Forums to give ordinary citizens easier
access to the decision-making process via their elected
Councillors, which was welcome.
I’ve attended
transitional meetings of now new South
West LAC and raised questions about Ward Forums, but have
not had a clear answer, nor had an opportunity for
discussions.
Following our Referendum
result, it’s even more important
that regular Ward Forums are included – each with an
electorate of about 15,000 – to give them more
“bottom-up” involvement in the new decision-making
process. So therefore, my question is
– Please reconsider this, otherwise most of the electorate
will feel excluded from this new, but remote process.
|
|
|
4.4.2
|
In response, Councillor Julie
Grocutt (Executive Member for Community
Engagement and Governance) thanked Mr. Kewley for his question. Councillor Grocutt
commented that the Council already had seven Local Area Committees
(LACs) in operation, each of which comprised the local Councillors
from four wards, and were working with
local communities to develop and deliver local plans. She added that if Mr. Kewley was suggesting that Ward Forums be held in
addition to the LACs, so that individual Wards have local meetings,
then this would be a matter for the Councillors in each Ward to
consider. Councillor Grocutt indicated that she thought this was
...
view the full minutes text for item 4.
|
|
5. |
Committee System Structure PDF 299 KB
To approve, with or without amendment, the
recommendations made by the Governance Committee at
its meeting held on 9th March 2022 in relation to a new
committee system of governance for Sheffield City Council,
as set out in the report of the Director of Legal and Governance,
published with this agenda.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
5.1
|
RESOLVED: On the Motion
of Councillor Dianne Hurst, seconded by Councillor Sue Alston,
that, in accordance with Council Procedure Rules 4
(Suspension and Amendment of Council Procedure
Rules) and 11 (Motions which may be moved
without notice):-
(a) Council Procedure Rule 17.5 be suspended to remove the time
limit on the speeches of the mover and seconder of the motion and
all other speakers shall have 2 minutes; and
(b) Council
Procedure Rule 17.6 be suspended to remove the 25-minute time limit
for the item of business.
|
|
|
5.2
|
It was moved by Councillor Julie Grocutt, and seconded by Councillor Penny Baker,
that, as recommended in the report of the Director
of Legal and Governance published with the agenda, and in
accordance with the recommendations made by the Governance
Committee at its meeting held on 9 March 2022, as relates to a new
committee system of governance for Sheffield City Council, it
be:-
|
|
|
|
RESOLVED: That:-
|
|
|
|
(1)
the various elements of a committee system of governance set out
in this report and its appendices, be agreed for implementation
from the May 2022 AGM in line with the legally binding referendum
of 6 May 2021 and subsequent resolution of Full Council on 19 May
2021;
|
|
|
|
(2) the
Governance Committee be instructed to conduct a review of the new
governance system, commencing six months after implementation
(November 2022) with a view to recommending improvements to Full
Council for May 2023.
This review will:-
a.
Use the previously agreed ‘strategic
aims’ and ‘design principles’ found at Appendix 2
as its success criteria;
b.
Actively seek and use feedback from residents,
stakeholders, partners, councillors and
officers to inform its assessment against those criteria, in line
with the new ways of working expected of all decision-makers within
the new system; and
c.
Take account of any changes to the local and
national context;
|
|
|
|
(3) all
existing delegations to officers made by the Executive continue in
force and effect save that a requirement to act in consultation
with an Individual Executive Member will be read as a requirement
to act in consultation with the appropriate Policy Committee Chair
(as per section 6.12, recommendation 89 of the attached
report);
|
|
|
|
(4) the
elements of a revised constitution which accompany this report
(Appendix 5) be approved with effect from the 18 May 2022 Annual
Meeting of the Council; and
|
|
|
|
(5) the Director of Legal and Governance be requested to submit the full
Constitution for approval to the 18 May 2022 Annual Meeting of
Council.
|
|
|
5.3
|
Whereupon, it was moved
by Councillor Cate McDonald, and seconded by Councillor Sioned-Mair
Richards, as an amendment, that the motion now submitted be amended
by the addition of a new paragraph (6) as follows:-
“(6) an additional
recommendation relating to the role of the Policy Committees be
inserted in the report, after paragraph 48, as follows:-
49. It is the
responsibility of each Committee to work within the budget
framework agreed by Council. This includes taking timely action to
address any overspend within ...
view the full minutes text for item 5.
|
|