Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Appointment of Chair
To appoint the Chair of the Committee for the
municipal year 2022/23
Additional documents:
Minutes:
1.1
|
RESOLVED: That Councillor Fran Belbin
be elected as Chair of the North East Area Committee for the
municipal year 2022/23.
|
|
2. |
Apologies for Absence
Additional documents:
Minutes:
2.1
|
Apologies for absence were received from
Councillors Tony Damms and Garry Weatherall.
|
|
3. |
Exclusion of Public and Press
To identify items where resolutions may be
moved to exclude the press and public.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
3.1
|
There were no items that excluded the public
and press.
|
|
4. |
Declarations of Interest PDF 129 KB
Members to declare any interests they have in
the business to be considered at the meeting.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
4.1
|
No declarations of interest were made at the
meeting.
|
|
5. |
Minutes of Previous Meeting PDF 146 KB
To approve the minutes of the Committee held
on 22 March, 2022 and 18 May, 2022.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
5.1
|
RESOLVED: That the minutes of the
previous meeting, held on the 22 March, 2022 and 18 May, 2022 were
agreed as an accurate record.
|
|
6. |
Introduction of Youth Cabinet
Additional documents:
Minutes:
6.1
|
Sarah Stevens and Emma Hinchliffe from Youth
Services were in attendance to give a presentation on what the
youth cabinet was and their areas of priority across the city.
|
6.2
|
It was explained that youth voice and
participation was about listening to young people and acting upon
what they had to say.
|
6.3
|
Sheffield Youth Cabinet was made up of elected
youth councillors, UK youth parliament members and various special
interest/link seats which enabled as many young people as possible
to have a voice and influence change.
|
6.4
|
Youth Cabinet members were elected by their
peers once every two years to represent them at a local level. It
meets monthly as a Full Cabinet and in between those meetings there
was action groups to work on various city-wide/national key
priorities.
|
6.5
|
The presentation showed the Youth Cabinet
structure which highlighted how many youth members represented each
local area.
|
6.6
|
Marnay Locke from the Youth Cabinet explained
that health & wellbeing was a national priority area for the
year. City-wide priorities were to look at being able to vote at
the age of 16, reforming the curriculum and greater wellbeing. The
priority area which the youth cabinet was looking into specifically
for the North East area was places to go and things to do for young
people.
|
6.7
|
The presentation showed contact details for
Sarah Stevens, Emma Hinchcliffe and the Youth Cabinet.
|
6.8
|
The Chair thanked officers and the Youth
Cabinet for attending the meeting and speaking on this item.
|
|
7. |
North East Local Area Committee - Proposed Spend 2022/23
(a) Approval of the
report
(b) Time for the public to
attend roadshows and stalls on the themes and priorities of the
Community Plan
Additional documents:
Decision:
|
|
|
7.1
|
Each Local Area Committee has a £100,000
budget to address local priorities, identified within their
respective Community Plans. This report
sets out details of the proposed spending in respect of this
£100,000 during the 2022/23 financial year. This report gives an overview of the general
categories of proposed expenditure and seeks authorisation from the
North East Local Area Committee to permit the Community Services
Manager, in consultation with the LAC Chair, to spend monies to
address identified priorities within the Community Plan.
|
|
|
7.2
|
RESOLVED: That the North East
Local Area Committee:-
(i) Noted the
proposed allocations from the £100,000 budget to address local
priorities in the North East LAC Community Plan in 2022/23, as
detailed in the report.
(ii)
To the extent that it is not covered by existing authority,
authorises the Community Services Manager, following further
consultation as described in the report, to make decisions on
expenditure relating to the priorities set out in the report
provided that:
- the decision is taken
in consultation with the Local Area Committee Chair,
- the decision may not
approve expenditure in excess of the allocated budget for each
priority set out in the report, and
- a report detailing
the delegated spending decisions taken by the Community Services
Manager is presented to the next Local Area Committee
meeting.
|
|
|
7.3
|
Reasons for
Decision
|
|
|
|
The North East LAC is asked to
note the broad allocation of funding under the priority headings
identified to assist its ability to monitor its budget, and to
authorise the Community Services Manager to approve expenditure
above the current delegated authority in certain circumstances so
that delivery of the Community Plan is not delayed.
|
|
|
7.4
|
Alternatives
Considered and Rejected
|
|
|
7.4.1
7.4.2
|
Decisions on any expenditure
above the existing authority to the Community Services Manager
could be reserved to the LAC but this would delay delivery of
priority actions to address specific issues identified in the
Community Plan.
|
All decisions on expenditure to support
Community Plan priorities could be delegated to
officers. However, this would restrict
the LAC’s ability to monitor its delegated budget and
delivery of the Community Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minutes:
7.1
|
The North East Community Services Manager,
Lindsey Hill gave an overview of how the LACs budget was intended
to be distributed across 8 themed priorities.
|
7.2
|
It was mentioned that from the LACs
£100,000 budget, there had been £80,000 allocated to
the priority themes. The remaining £20,000 would be reserved
for additional schemes that may arise throughout the year.
|
7.3
|
Each of the 8 priority themes had a proportion
of the £80,000 and their proportion depended on how much was
estimated to deliver their plan.
|
7.4
|
A Member of the Public asked if the LAC budget
of £100,000 had to be spent before the end of March 2023.
They added that consultation needed to happen to best decide what
the priorities were.
The Chair
(Councillor Fran Belbin) explained that consultation had occurred
in previous LAC meetings therefore the proposed spend was based on
those discussions.
|
7.5
|
A member of the public referred to priority 3
in the proposed spend 2022/23 report. They asked how they would be
able to tell if the clean-up and regenerate of hot spot areas had
been a success. They added that litter in the community had been an
ongoing issue that never seemed to be dealt with.
The Chair stated
that residents would be able see visible improvements at the hot
spot areas.
Councillor Peter
Price mentioned the issue was with educating the communities
residents to prevent people littering. Councillor Price stated he
had been involved in litter picking before although the problem
always returned.
|
7.6
|
A member of the public raised concerns around
the amount of vehicles parking on grass verges.
The Chair stated
that Waste and Street Scene Policy Committee was looking at this
issue.
|
7.7
|
A member of the public asked where the funding
of £100,000 for the LAC budget came from.
The Chair confirmed
that this was council funding, generated by Council tax.
|
7.8
|
A member of the public asked why there was not
an Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) had not been undertaken.
The Community
Services manager explained that the council process around proposed
spend did not require an EIA. This process could be shared with
members of the public if they requested sight of it. It was added
that specific projects within the priorities will have an EIA.
|
7.9
|
A member of the public asked how much of the
LAC budget would be used to fund administrative work.
The Chair confirmed
that none of the £100,000 will be used to fund administrative
work. The proposed spend for the LAC was highlighted in the report.
The budget for the LAC teams could be found in the full council
budget which was agreed in May.
|
7.10
|
A member of the public asked what percentage
of residents in the north east were part of a Tenants and Residents
Association (TARA).
Councillor Safiya
Saeed was unable to confirm the figure although mentioned it was
low. Councillor Saeed raised the importance of needing more people
to come forward for TARA and that this needed ...
view the full minutes text for item 7.
|
|
8. |
Forward Public Meeting ideas and suggestions
Additional documents:
Minutes:
8.1
|
The LAC and members of the
public were then asked to go into breakout sessions and discuss the
priorities which were displayed around the meeting room. This
lasted approximately 45 minutes.
|
8.2
|
Following the breakout session, the Committee
reconvened to ask members of the public if they had any suggestions
on public meetings going forward.
|
8.3
|
A member of the public asked what had happened
to ward meetings as these used to meet on a regular basis but had
not for some time.
The Chair explained
that LACs had been put in place to bring councillors closer to
members of public, just like ward meetings did. The Chair added
that if members of the public wished to talk within a smaller
setting than the LAC, then to contact their ward councillor.
Councillor Dawn
Dale explained that the LACs were part of new Committee System
structure of the Council. Therefore, they could also refer issues
to relevant policy committees. Councillor Dale mentioned that she
had attempted to hold ward meetings in Brightside although these
were poorly attended.
|
8.4
|
The Chair asked members of the public if they
felt like online meetings were also a good way to engage with
members of the public.
There was a general show of consent from
members of the public.
The Chair also raised the importance of asking
the same questions to members of the public who were unable to
attend the meeting.
|
8.5
|
A member of the public asked where they could
watch live or recorded streams of the LAC meetings.
The Chair explained
that these meeting were been recorded and live streamed on the
Council’s webpage. It was added that the LAC would look to
publish a link on the LACs social media pages after the
meeting.
|
8.6
|
Councillor Jayne Dunn mentioned why it was
just as important to receive comments and views after the meeting.
Members of the public were encouraged to submit feedback to either
their ward councillors or the LAC team, these would be equally
valued. – any comments after meeting are just as
relevant.
|
8.7
|
A member of the public raised concerns around
the time it took to contact the Council through the Council’s
Contact Centre.
The Chair
apologised for the delays and advised that members of the public
contacted their ward councillor if they needed to address an issue
urgently and had been unsuccessful with the Council’s Contact
Centre.
|
|
9. |
Public Questions and Petitions
To receive any questions or petitions from
members of the public.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
9.1
|
The Committee received the following questions
and petitions from members of the public, in attendance at the
meeting.
|
9.2
|
Petitions
|
9.2.1
|
Petition requesting the number 5 bus service
not be terminated.
|
|
Fatima Own raised the importance of the bus
service on the difficulty it would cause to local residents if the
service was to be terminated.
The Chair explained
that bus operators had informed the Council that they were
terminating the service as they were unable to make enough money
from this service. It was added that that the responsibility for
bus services lied with the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined
Authority and The Mayor, Oliver Coppard, is working to urgently
address these issues, with a view to improved public control of
transport.
|
9.2.2
|
Petition requesting the Council protected
residents from anti-social behaviour
|
|
Ahmed Dualeh informed the Committee of the
anti-social behaviour that had been occurring in the Carbrook
area.
The Chair
apologised for the horrendous experience that this family had to
endure. The Chair added that she was aware that this situation was
currently been investigated by the Police. The Chair advised that
the petitioner discussed the issue privately with local councillors
and the relevant services in attendance after the closure of the
meeting.
|
9.3
|
Questions
|
9.3.1
|
Mike Barnfield
|
|
It was mentioned that the North East Community
Plan had little mention of how private landlords had a devastating
effect on the community. It was added that Selective Licensing was
also a total failure. Therefore, what strategic actions does the
LAC intend to take.
The Chair explained
there was a Council service which worked with private landlords
although this was a city-wide issue and will be referred to the
relevant Policy Committee.
Councillor Mark
Jones added that part of the issue was around the lack of funding
to regulate the private sector.
RESOLVED:
that the issue around private landlords and selective licensing, as
mentioned above, be referred to the Housing Policy Committee.
|
9.3.2
|
John Brooks
|
|
Can the LAC explain the difference between
rewilding and total neglect. Especially on land that belonged to
housing.
The Chair explained
there was a Housing Manager present at the meeting who could advise
on the policy and on what is happening on specific pieces of
housing land
Claire Lane
mentioned that the agreement with parks service withing the council
had not changed. Therefore, the current arrangements will continue.
It was explained that there does not need to be TARA in place to do
something.
|
9.3.3
|
Mick Daniels
|
|
Was there anything the Council could do to
ensure that children could participate in local activities even if
they were not on a free school meal allowance.
The Chair agreed
this was stigmatising for families. It was mentioned that some
community partners that facilitate these local activities cannot
afford to make all their activities open to all children. The Chair
stated that the Council would continue to feedback their concerns
to the Government on this.
Councillor Dawn
Dale mentioned that she was involved in a piece of work
...
view the full minutes text for item 9.
|
|