Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Apologies for Absence
Additional documents:
Minutes:
1.1
|
Apologies for absence were received from
Councillors Tony Downing, Neale Gibson, Mazher Iqbal, Francyne
Johnson and Alan Law.
|
|
|
|
2. |
Declarations of Interest PDF 129 KB
Members to declare any
interests they have in the business to be considered at the
meeting.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
2.1
|
In relation to the urgent item of business to
be considered at the meeting regarding GP Services (item 5 of the
minutes), personal interests were declared (a) by Councillor Mike
Drabble on the grounds that he provides mental health counselling
services in non-urgent Primary Care and (b) by Councillor
Joe Otten on the basis that he has a financial connection to a GP
practice.
|
|
|
|
3. |
Public Questions and Petitions and Other Communications
(a) To
receive any questions or petitions from the public, or
communications submitted by the Lord Mayor or the Chief Executive
and to pass such resolutions thereon as the Council Procedure Rules
permit and as may be deemed expedient.
(NOTE: There is a time
limit of one hour for the above item of business. In accordance with the arrangements
published on the Council’s website in relation to meetings of
the Council held whilst social distancing restrictions and other
public health safety measures still apply, questions/petitions are
required to be submitted in writing, to committee@sheffield.gov.uk, by 9.00 a.m.
on Monday 5th July.)
(b) Petition Requiring Debate
The
Council’s Petitions Scheme requires that a petition
containing over 5,000 signatures be the subject of debate at the
Council meeting. A qualifying petition
has been received as follows:-
Petition
To
debate an electronic petition containing over 6,400 signatures (of
which more than 5,160 are from individuals who live, work or study
in Sheffield) asking Sheffield City Council to stop using
Glyphosate. The online
petition -
Sheffield City Council, stop using Glyphosate | 38 Degrees -
includes further information.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
3.1
|
The Lord Mayor (Councillor Gail
Smith) reported that three petitions and questions from three
members of the public had been received prior to the published
deadline for submission of petitions and questions for this
meeting. On two of the petitions,
representations were to be made on behalf of the petitioners, and a
third petition would be received in the absence of a
speaker. Prior to the meeting, one of
the questioners had withdrawn their questions.
|
|
|
3.2
|
Petitions
|
|
|
3.2.1
|
Petition Requesting The
Installation Of A Fence Around The Green Area And Open Space
Between Wensley Close And Wade Street To Stop Anti-Social
Behaviour
|
|
|
|
The Council received an
electronic petition containing 25 signatures requesting that the
Council install a fence around the green area and open space,
between Wensley Close and Wade Street, to stop anti-social
behaviour.
|
|
|
|
Representations on behalf of
the petitioners were made by Angilla Al-Gulaidi. Mr Al-Gulaidi
stated he had lived in the Wensley Close area for over ten years
and had seen increasing levels of anti-social behaviour in this
area carried out by young people. He stated he had provided
evidence of anti-social behaviour along with the petition. He said
that the anti-social behaviour had made residents in the area
anxious and frightened, and said that the problem had been getting
worse. Mr Al-Gulaidi asked that a fence be installed to cordon off
the area. He suggested that if this was not possible, a new
football field could be added in Wensley Park to provide an
alternative space for the young people.
|
|
|
|
The Council referred the
petition to Councillor Alison Teal (Executive
Member for Sustainable Neighbourhoods, Wellbeing, Parks and
Leisure). Councillor Teal thanked Mr Al-Gulaidi and his fellow
petitioners for presenting the petition and for suggesting possible
solutions. She stated that she felt it was important that officers
visit the area, and that as she was unfamiliar with the area she
would ask officers to provide her with background information.
Councillor Teal said she agreed that the behaviour described was
unacceptable and added that she would speak with officers and Mr
Al-Gulaidi soon.
|
|
|
3.2.2
|
Petition Requesting The Council
To Improve Safety For Pedestrians At The Junction Of Little London
Road And Chesterfield Road
|
|
|
|
The Council received a joint
electronic and paper petition containing 44 signatures requesting
that the Council improve safety for pedestrians at the junction of
Little London Road and Chesterfield Road.
|
|
|
|
Representations on behalf of
the petitioners were made by Tony Tigwell. Mr Tigwell stated that
Chesterfield Road was widened two years ago, and a drop kerb was
added. He said that this created a dangerous crossing point near
Lidl and B&M Bargains. He stated that vulnerable residents were
particularly at risk. He said he felt it was a surprise that there
had not been any fatalities on the road. Mr Tigwell said that this
petition had been started over a year ago and was delayed due to
the pandemic. Mr Tigwell requested that the Council remove the drop
kerb on the corner ...
view the full minutes text for item 3.
|
|
4. |
Members' Questions PDF 2 MB
5.1 Questions relating to
urgent business – Council Procedure Rule 16.6(ii).
5.2 Supplementary questions on
written questions submitted at this meeting – Council
Procedure Rule 16.4.
5.3 Questions on the discharge
of the functions of the South Yorkshire Joint Authorities for Fire
and Rescue and Pensions – Section 41 of the Local Government
Act 1985 – Council Procedure Rule 16.6(i).
(NB. Minutes of recent meetings of the two South Yorkshire Joint
Authorities have been made available to all Members of the Council
via the following link -
http://democracy.sheffield.gov.uk/ecCatDisplay.aspx?sch=doc&cat=13165&path=0)
Additional documents:
Minutes:
4.1
|
Urgent Business
|
|
|
4.1.1
|
With the permission of the Lord Mayor
(Councillor Gail Smith), Councillor Ben Curran asked the following
question relating to urgent business, under the provisions of
Council Procedure Rule 16.6(ii):-
|
|
|
|
"The Government have announced the intention to
relax covid-19 restrictions from 19th July, yet many experts and
commentators feel that wearing masks should remain compulsory on
public transport and in other enclosed spaces - including
Sheffield’s Director of Public Health who has said he would
continue to wear a mask.
Will Sheffield City Council explore measures that
could be taken locally to require passengers on local buses and
trams to wear masks, subject to the current exemptions - for
example, through working with the Sheffield City Region Mayor and
bus companies to include a local requirement as a condition of
carriage, or other measures which could be introduced through the
local bus partnership?"
|
|
|
4.1.2
|
In response, the Leader of the Council
(Councillor Terry Fox) commented that the Government’s
intention to place the onus for public safety back onto the
individual citizen was a shift acutely recognised by the Council
and it would continue to explore whatever measures were available
within the city to maintain public safety. He added that public safety remained the
Council’s top priority.
|
|
|
4.1.3
|
Councillor Douglas Johnson (Executive Member
for Climate Change, Environment and Transport), in supporting the
comments made by the Leader, referred to his portfolio
responsibilities for transport and his involvement in the Covid
Prevention Management Board and stated that the wearing of face
coverings has been a contentious and, at times, divisive issue
during the pandemic. Although it would
no longer be against the law to fail to wear a face covering, he
did support the view of the Council’s Director of Public
Health, and other scientists, that the wearing of face masks would
continue to be beneficial in reducing the spread of Covid and other
viruses. He added, however, that there
was no easy way to enforce the wearing of masks in various settings
and he alluded to reports of hostility from some members of the
public towards public service workers trying to enforce the legal
requirements, and towards disabled members of the public who were
not wearing masks due to their disability or health condition, and
he concluded his comments by stating that he would urge the public
to continue to wear face coverings in enclosed public spaces in the
interests of community safety, whilst also understanding, and
demonstrating respect and tolerance for, those who were unable to
do so.
|
|
|
4.2
|
Written Questions
|
|
|
|
A schedule of questions to Executive Members,
submitted in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 16, and which
contained written answers, was circulated. Supplementary questions, under the provisions of
Council Procedure Rule 16.4, were asked and were answered by the
appropriate Executive Members until the expiry of the time limit
for Members’ Questions (in accordance with Council Procedure
Rule 16.7).
|
|
|
4.3
|
South Yorkshire Joint Authorities
|
|
|
|
Questions relating to the discharge of the
functions of the South Yorkshire ... view
the full minutes text for item 4.
|
|
5. |
Urgent Item of Business - Notice of Motion Regarding GP Services
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
5.1
|
RESOLVED: On the motion of Councillor Tony
Damms and seconded by Councillor Dianne Hurst, that, in accordance
with Council Procedure Rule 9.1, the order of business as published
on the Council Summons be altered by taking the urgent item of
business (Notice of Motion Regarding “GP Services”),
followed by item 7 (Notice of Motion Regarding “The City
Centre”) as the next two items of business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
The Lord Mayor (Councillor Gail Smith)
announced the proposal that an urgent item of business be
considered at the meeting. Council Procedure Rule 26 states that
“An item of business may be considered at a meeting of the
Council as a matter of urgency, where it has not been possible to
give five clear working days’ notice, on the recommendation
of the Chair, but the reason for such urgency must be recorded in
the minutes. Any non-confidential or non-exempt report relating to
such item must be made available for public inspection once it has
been issued.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
The Lord Mayor stated that a request had been
received from Councillors Jack Scott and Ruth Milsom asking that
the Council considers an additional Notice of Motion regarding GP
Services. The reasons for urgency and
explanation of why it was not possible to submit the Notice of
Motion in accordance with the usual timescales, was:-
·
General practice is coming under intense pressure
and this is reaching crisis point in Sheffield as well as
elsewhere;
·
A group of senior councillors met with senior
general practitioners, Clinical Commissioning Group commissioners
and the Director of Public Health on the evening of 30th
June. At that meeting, the councillors were left in no doubt about
the seriousness and urgency of the situation. The GPs were keen for
support from the Council. In particular, to help the public
understand the pressure on general practice at the
moment.
·
As the meeting only took place on Wednesday
30th June, this did not allow for a Notice of Motion to
be submitted within the usual timescale.
In view of the nature and timing of the issue,
the Lord Mayor stated that she was satisfied that there were clear
reasons for taking the Notice of Motion as an urgent item of
business. She added that the urgent
item will replace the Notice of Motion at item 8 on
the agenda, regarding “Investing In Early Years”, which
is to be withdrawn by the mover of the motion, Councillor Jayne
Dunn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
The proposed Motion was circulated to all
Members of the Council on 7th July 2021 and has been
published on the Council’s website. Copies of the Motion, and
proposed amendments to it, were available in the meeting room.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
It was moved by Councillor Jack Scott, and
seconded by Councillor Ruth Milsom, that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) recognises
that general practices across the country are at breaking point,
putting the whole of the NHS at risk;
(b) believes
that Primary Care is the ‘Bedrock of the NHS’, dealing
with around 90% of patient ...
view the full minutes text for item 5.
|
|
6. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "The City Centre" - Given By Councillor Martin Smith And To Be Seconded By Councillor Mohammed Mahroof
That this Council:-
(a) recognises that a thriving
city centre is vitally important for the economic and social future
of Sheffield because it supports jobs, attracts inward investment
and provides a focus for the cultural life of Sheffield;
(b) notes that the Covid
pandemic has had a devastating impact on the city centre, with
decreasing footfall and a significant increase in retail
closures;
(c) is concerned that the permanent
closure of the John Lewis store will deliver another
long-term blow to the city centre;
(d) notes that only 6 months
after the then Cabinet Member for Business & Investment
announced that a £3m deal had secured the John Lewis store in
the city centre, the Company proposed its closure;
(e) believes that due to eight
wasted years by the previous Labour administration, the city centre
has become too dependent on the fortunes and decisions of large
national retailers, at the expense of local, independent
businesses;
(f) notes that, despite
numerous commitments given by the previous Administration to either
refurbish or relocate the Central Library and that the building is
“it’s top priority for the Council’s cultural
capital investment”, there is still no long-term plan for the
Graves building;
(g) notes that prime land at
Sheaf Square has now been unused for 15 years, while the provision
for taxis at the railway station continues to be poor and
obstructive to other vehicles;
(h) notes that recent changes
to road layouts, relocation of bus stops, the closure of a major
car park and measures to accommodate social distancing during the
pandemic, have made it more difficult for people to access some
parts of the city centre;
(i) notes that last
summer the Council announced it was working on a new strategy for
the central area of Sheffield; and
(j) therefore requests
the Administration to:-
(i)
commit to publishing the new strategy for the central area of
Sheffield within the next 3 months;
(ii)
commit to improving access for people to travel into and around the
city centre; and
(iii)
commit to publishing a timeline to upgrade temporary bus stop
facilities, introduced following the closure of Pinstone Street to bus services, to the equivalent
City Centre “gold” standard.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
6.1
|
It was moved by Councillor Martin Smith, and
seconded by Councillor Mohammed
Mahroof, that this Council:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) recognises
that a thriving city centre is vitally important for the economic
and social future of Sheffield because it supports jobs, attracts
inward investment and provides a focus for the cultural life of
Sheffield;
(b) notes that
the Covid pandemic has had a devastating impact on the city centre,
with decreasing footfall and a significant increase in retail
closures;
(c) is concerned
that the permanent closure of the John Lewis store will deliver
another long-term blow to the city centre;
(d) notes that
only 6 months after the then Cabinet Member for Business &
Investment announced that a £3m deal had secured the John
Lewis store in the city centre, the Company proposed its
closure;
(e) believes
that due to eight wasted years by the previous Labour
administration, the city centre has become too dependent on the
fortunes and decisions of large national retailers, at the expense
of local, independent businesses;
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) notes
that, despite numerous commitments given by the previous
Administration to either refurbish or relocate the Central Library
and that the building is “it’s top priority for the
Council’s cultural capital investment”, there is still
no long-term plan for the Graves building;
(g) notes that
prime land at Sheaf Square has now been unused for 15 years, while
the provision for taxis at the railway station continues to be poor
and obstructive to other vehicles;
(h) notes that
recent changes to road layouts, relocation of bus stops, the
closure of a major car park and measures to accommodate social
distancing during the pandemic, have made it more difficult for
people to access some parts of the city centre;
(i) notes
that last summer the Council announced it was working on a new
strategy for the central area of Sheffield; and
(j)
therefore requests the Administration to:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
commit to publishing the new strategy for the central area of
Sheffield within the next 3 months;
(ii)
commit to improving access for people to travel into and around the
city centre; and
(iii) commit to
publishing a timeline to upgrade temporary bus stop facilities,
introduced following the closure of Pinstone Street to bus
services, to the equivalent City Centre “gold”
standard.
|
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
Whereupon, it was moved by Councillor Abdul
Khayum, seconded by Councillor Denise Fox, as an amendment, that
the Motion now submitted be amended by the deletion of paragraphs
(c) to (j) and the addition of new paragraphs (c) to (j) as
follows:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) believes
that when the regeneration of our city centre was stalled from the
financial crash and lack of action from the previous Lib Dem
administration, the Labour administration acted to take control of
the scheme away from a development company back into the hands of
the city and believes that this proactive action was necessary in
contrast to the inaction of the previous Lib Dem
administration;
(d) welcomes
that by doing this the Heart of the City ...
view the full minutes text for item 6.
|
|
7. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "Putting Sheffield First" - Given By Councillor Terry Fox And To Be Seconded By Councillor Julie Grocutt
That this Council:-
(a) recognises the incredible
efforts that all staff, partner organisations, voluntary sector,
local businesses, community groups and the people of Sheffield have
made to get the city through the past 18 months, and thanks
everyone for their contribution;
(b) notes that as the city
moves out of lockdown, and continues to open up, it is essential
that the Council takes action to secure the city’s recovery
across a wide range of areas including support for jobs and the
local economy, children and education, supporting people in
financial hardship and the full reopening of Council services;
(c) welcomes the co-operation
agreement between the Labour and Green Groups, as set out
below:-
“This Agreement is dated 19 May 2021 and is made between the
Labour and Green political groups elected as Members of Sheffield
City Council. This is an agreement for
the 2021/22 municipal year and will therefore come to an end at the
AGM in May 2022 unless extended by agreement of both parties.
This Agreement has been drawn up following detailed discussions
between the two groups. The Green and Labour Groups acknowledge
that no party has an overall majority on Sheffield City
Council and this requires a new way of
working to be established between the parties.
Both groups are committed to working in an open, inclusive and
democratic way and ensuring the Council has stability and effective
leadership. In order to support this
and reflecting the decision of the people of Sheffield in the
governance referendum, a politically proportionate transition
committee model has been introduced and will be piloted to enable a
new way of working in the Council which will facilitate the
transition to the committee system.
Both parties will support the appointment of Terry Fox as Leader of
the Council, Julie Grocutt as Deputy Leader of the Council and the
appointment of five Labour and three Green Executive Members
(designed to represent political proportionality). Whilst the
Liberal Democrats declined to join the Executive, if they were to
reconsider this decision, then they will get three seats, two to be
offered by Labour and one offered by the Greens.
Both parties will work together in the interests of
Sheffield. In order to secure the
city’s recovery we will:-
(i) implement the new
Local Area Committees, giving power back to our communities;
(ii) introduce a new
approach to community safety with additional safer neighbourhood
wardens;
(iii) provide additional
investment in our young people;
(iv) support the recovery of
our district centres;
(v) implement the
recommendations in the Arup report dated 19 March to create a
pathway to deliver the shared ambition for net zero; and
(vi) appoint an independent
person to conduct a local non-statutory inquiry into the management
of the street trees dispute.
Both parties agree:-
(i) a commitment to deal
with each other fairly and honestly;
(ii) to recognise that
this is a new way of working that has not been experienced in
Sheffield before;
(iii) to recognise that all
...
view the full agenda text for item 7.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
7.1
|
It was formally moved by Councillor Terry Fox,
and formally seconded by Councillor Julie Grocutt, that this
Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) recognises
the incredible efforts that all staff, partner organisations,
voluntary sector, local businesses, community groups and the people
of Sheffield have made to get the city through the past 18 months,
and thanks everyone for their contribution;
|
|
|
|
(b) notes that
as the city moves out of lockdown, and continues to open up, it is
essential that the Council takes action to secure the city’s
recovery across a wide range of areas including support for jobs
and the local economy, children and education, supporting people in
financial hardship and the full reopening of Council services;
|
|
|
|
(c) welcomes
the co-operation agreement between the Labour and Green Groups, as
set out below:-
|
|
|
|
“This Agreement is dated 19 May 2021 and is made between the
Labour and Green political groups elected as Members of Sheffield
City Council. This is an agreement for
the 2021/22 municipal year and will therefore come to an end at the
AGM in May 2022 unless extended by agreement of both parties.
This Agreement has been drawn up following detailed discussions
between the two groups. The Green and Labour Groups acknowledge
that no party has an overall majority on Sheffield City Council and
this requires a new way of working to be established between the
parties.
|
|
|
|
Both groups are committed to working in an open, inclusive and
democratic way and ensuring the Council has stability and effective
leadership. In order to support this
and reflecting the decision of the people of Sheffield in the
governance referendum, a politically proportionate transition
committee model has been introduced and will be piloted to enable a
new way of working in the Council which will facilitate the
transition to the committee system.
Both parties will support the appointment of Terry Fox as Leader of
the Council, Julie Grocutt as Deputy Leader of the Council and the
appointment of five Labour and three Green Executive Members
(designed to represent political proportionality). Whilst the
Liberal Democrats declined to join the Executive, if they were to
reconsider this decision, then they will get three seats, two to be
offered by Labour and one offered by the Greens.
Both parties will work together in the interests of
Sheffield. In order to secure the
city’s recovery we will:-
|
|
|
|
(i)
implement the new Local Area Committees, giving power back to our
communities;
(ii)
introduce a new approach to community safety with additional safer
neighbourhood wardens;
(iii) provide
additional investment in our young people;
(iv) support
the recovery of our district centres;
(v) implement
the recommendations in the Arup report dated 19 March to create a
pathway to deliver the shared ambition for net zero; and
(vi) appoint an
independent person to conduct a local non-statutory inquiry into
the management of the street trees dispute.
|
|
|
|
Both parties agree:-
|
|
|
|
(i) a
commitment to deal with each other fairly and honestly;
(ii) to
recognise that this is a new way of working that ...
view the full minutes text for item 7.
|
|
8. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "Investing in Early Years" - Given By Councillor Jayne Dunn And To Be Seconded By Councillor Mick Rooney
That this Council:-
(a) believes that the early
years are critical for a child’s development and childcare is
a fundamental building block of our economy and further believes
that over the last decade, early years services have been neglected
by the government;
(b) notes with concern the
report ‘Closed Doors’ by Action for Children, which
considered children’s centre usage between 2014/15 and
2017/18 and stated “Despite the importance of
children’s centres to many families, their existence is under
threat. Years of funding cuts have left councils with little choice
but to reduce children’s centre budgets. As resources become
increasingly stretched, a number of centres have closed. Many of
those that remain have been forced to reduce the level of service
on offer.”;
(c) notes recent research
which highlights that nationally over 1,000 Sure Start Centres have
been lost since 2010 and believes that this is the legacy of the
coalition government’s reckless austerity policies targeting
cuts at children most in need, and in addition, notes that 12,000
early education and childcare providers have been lost since 2015
and 30,000 more early years providers are at risk of closure within
a year;
(d) is concerned that the
sector has been disproportionately impacted by Covid-19 and
believes that, although early years providers were relied upon to
enable key workers to continue to work during the pandemic, they
received insufficient financial protection;
(e) welcomes that Sheffield
City Council provided additional support for the publicly funded
hours (over and above national guidance), however, believes that
the Government failed early years providers providing little
support for the paid provision;
(f) is concerned that
the insufficient increase in funding, historical underfunding,
increasing costs and impact of Covid-19, means that early
years’ providers in Sheffield will be faced with financial
sustainability issues across the childcare sector and that it is
also becoming increasingly difficult to recruit and retain staff
due to the early years providers’ inability to pay
competitive rates;
(g) believes Sheffield
continues to be underfunded as compared to other local authorities,
with the disparity in Sheffield’s hourly Funded Early
Learning (FEL) rate compared to other core cities, with Bristol
receiving £5.69 an hour for three and
four year olds, which is 21% higher than Sheffield’s
rate of £4.71 per hour; Nottingham receives £5.06 per
hour, Newcastle £5.05, Manchester £5.01, Leeds
£4.95 and Birmingham £4.85, and only Liverpool receives
less, at £4.69;
(h) notes that Sheffield also
receives a lower rate for two year olds
at £5.36 per hour, compared to £5.59 in Bristol,
£5.46 in Manchester, £5.40 in Birmingham, £5.39
in Nottingham and £5.38 in Liverpool, with Leeds and
Manchester also receiving £5.36 per hour; and
(i) calls on the
Government to address this disparity and provide Sheffield with a
fair funding deal in addition to the additional investment needed
to ensure every child can recover the learning and social
development lost in the pandemic and has the chance to reach their
full potential.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
In accordance with the arrangements referred
to by the Lord Mayor earlier in the meeting, and at the request of
the proposed mover of the motion (Councillor Jayne Dunn), and with
the consent of both the proposed seconder of the motion (Councillor
Mick Rooney) and of the meeting, item 8 on the agenda (Notice of
Motion Regarding “Investing In Early Years”), was
withdrawn from consideration.
|
|
|
|
9. |
Notice of Motion Regarding "The Circular Economy" - Given By Councillor Tim Huggan And To Be Seconded By Councillor Andrew Sangar
That this Council:-
(a) believes that with the right
support, Sheffield businesses have the opportunity to be leaders in
green and sustainable technology;
(b) believes successful local
councils of the future will be those which adopt the
‘circular economy’ approach, which designs out waste,
is regenerative by design and is powered by renewable energy; at
its heart is the idea of reducing resource use through
well-developed local plan policies that embeds reusing resources
and materials that are in circulation in the economy and recycling
as a last resort, which will help us meet our sustainable
development goals;
(c) believes a prime example of this
is the EU ‘right to repair’ legislation which requires
manufacturers to design longer lasting products and make spare
parts readily available in a push to reduce waste and increase
opportunities for small businesses in the after-sales support
sector;
(d) believes that Sheffield must
have a huge and positive role to play in the transition to a
circular economy;
(e) notes that Sheffield has a
recycling rate for household waste of 30.7% which is well below the
highest performing English local authority, Three Rivers, of nearly
65%; and a radical improvement in the City’s recycling rate
will therefore require the collection and recycling of food
waste;
(f) also notes that food
waste is a hugely important economic and environmental issue for
the country, with more than 600 tonnes thrown away by Sheffield
households each year; and
(g) therefore resolves to:-
(i) publish the results of the
consultation with local universities, charities and Ellen MacArthur
Foundation Knowledge Partner organisations, that have experience of
delivering circular economy projects with businesses and local
authorities, as resolved at the Council meeting in December
2019;
(ii) support the
introduction of local deposit return and refill schemes for all
food and drinks containers;
(iii) make ‘evidence of
environmental improvement’ a requirement for all businesses
and organisations seeking grant funding or any other form of
financial support from the Council;
(iv) instruct the Executive
Director, Place, to carry out a full study that quantifies the
potential benefits of the circular economy approach to the city and
report back to full Council within six months;
(v) use best practice in
conjunction with councils across the UK and beyond, to define a
metric for progress made in the transition to circular economy;
(vi) explore measuring food
waste in all Council premises and support measures to communicate
the importance of reducing food waste;
(vii) develop proposals to introduce a
pilot scheme for the collection of food waste from households to
identify the issues and opportunities in a wider roll-out across
the whole city, with the intention to roll out domestic food waste
collection across the city to produce biogas energy via anaerobic
digestion as soon as is practicable;
(viii) support local businesses to transition
to closed loop systems and eco-design approaches using the
RESolve framework, with an emphasis on
production of products that can last several lifecycles, that are
easily repaired and are designed for ...
view the full agenda text for item 9.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
9.1
|
It was formally moved by Councillor Tim
Huggan, and formally seconded by Councillor Andrew Sangar, that
this Council:-
|
|
|
|
(a) believes
that with the right support, Sheffield businesses have the
opportunity to be leaders in green and sustainable technology;
(b) believes
successful local councils of the future will be those which adopt
the ‘circular economy’ approach, which designs out
waste, is regenerative by design and is powered by renewable
energy; at its heart is the idea of reducing resource use through
well-developed local plan policies that embeds reusing resources
and materials that are in circulation in the economy and recycling
as a last resort, which will help us meet our sustainable
development goals;
(c) believes a
prime example of this is the EU ‘right to repair’
legislation which requires manufacturers to design longer lasting
products and make spare parts readily available in a push to reduce
waste and increase opportunities for small businesses in the
after-sales support sector;
(d) believes that
Sheffield must have a huge and positive role to play in the
transition to a circular economy;
|
|
|
|
(e) notes that
Sheffield has a recycling rate for household waste of 30.7% which
is well below the highest performing English local authority, Three
Rivers, of nearly 65%; and a radical improvement in the
City’s recycling rate will therefore require the collection
and recycling of food waste;
(f) also
notes that food waste is a hugely important economic and
environmental issue for the country, with more than 600 tonnes
thrown away by Sheffield households each year; and
(g) therefore
resolves to:-
|
|
|
|
(i) publish
the results of the consultation with local universities, charities
and Ellen MacArthur Foundation Knowledge Partner organisations,
that have experience of delivering circular economy projects with
businesses and local authorities, as resolved at the Council
meeting in December 2019;
(ii)
support the introduction of local deposit return and refill schemes
for all food and drinks containers;
(iii) make
‘evidence of environmental improvement’ a requirement
for all businesses and organisations seeking grant funding or any
other form of financial support from the Council;
(iv) instruct
the Executive Director, Place, to carry out a full study that
quantifies the potential benefits of the circular economy approach
to the city and report back to full Council within six months;
(v) use best
practice in conjunction with councils across the UK and beyond, to
define a metric for progress made in the transition to circular
economy;
(vi) explore
measuring food waste in all Council premises and support measures
to communicate the importance of reducing food waste;
(vii) develop
proposals to introduce a pilot scheme for the collection of food
waste from households to identify the issues and opportunities in a
wider roll-out across the whole city, with the intention to roll
out domestic food waste collection across the city to produce
biogas energy via anaerobic digestion as soon as is
practicable;
(viii) support local
businesses to transition to closed loop systems and eco-design
approaches using the RESolve framework, with an emphasis on
production of ...
view the full minutes text for item 9.
|
|
10. |
Representation, Delegated Authority and Related Issues PDF 237 KB
To consider any changes to the
memberships and arrangements for meetings of Committees etc.,
delegated authority, and the appointment of representatives to
serve on other bodies.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
10.1
|
RESOLVED: On the Motion of Councillor Dianne
Hurst, seconded by Councillor Tony Damms, that:-
|
|
|
|
(a)(i) the impact on the allocation of seats on Council Committees of
the new Governance Committee, established at the meeting of the
Council on 16th June 2021, and comprising 11 seats, as
appended to this report, be noted and (ii) the final adjustment of
one seat (to be given up by the Liberal Democrat Group and
allocated to the Labour Group) to ensure that each group has the
required number of seats overall in comparison to the total number
of seats available on all committees to reflect their composition
on the Council as a whole, be approved, with that adjustment being
to reverse the adjustment made at the annual meeting of the Council
on 19th May 2021 on the Children, Young People and
Family Support Scrutiny and Policy Development
Committee;
|
|
|
|
(b) it be noted that, in
accordance with the authority given by the City Council at its
annual meeting held on 19th May 2021, the Chief Executive had
authorised the following appointment, with effect from the date
shown:-
|
|
|
|
Local Government Association
General Assembly
|
-
|
Councillor Douglas Johnson to
fill a vacancy, with effect from 22nd June
2021.
|
|
|
|
(c) approval be given to
the following changes to the memberships of Committees, Boards,
etc.:-
|
|
|
|
Children, Young People and
Family Support Scrutiny and Policy Development Committee
|
-
|
Councillor Jack Scott to
replace Councillor Kevin Oxley; and
Councillor Vickie Priestley to
replace Councillor Mike Levery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scrutiny Committee Substitute
Members
|
-
|
Councillor Kevin Oxley to
replace Councillor Joe Otten.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Council Transitional
Committee
|
-
|
Councillor Bryan Lodge to fill
a vacancy; creating a Transitional Committee
Substitute (non-Executive) Member vacancy; and
Councillor Colin Ross to
replace Councillor Shaffaq Mohammed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education, Health and Care
Transitional Committee
|
-
|
Councillor Kevin Oxley to
replace Councillor Colin Ross.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transitional Committee
Substitute (non-Executive) Members
|
-
|
Councillors Sue Alston,
Sue Auckland, Tim Huggan, Barbara Masters and Richard Shaw to fill
vacancies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing Committee
|
-
|
Councillor Ann Woolhouse to replace Councillor Mohammed Mahroof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Governance Committee
|
-
|
Councillors Sue Alston,
Dawn Dale, Christine Gilligan, Mark Jones, Mike
Levery, Mohammed Mahroof, Sioned-Mair Richards and Kaltum
Rivers to fill vacancies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access Liaison Group
|
-
|
Councillor Douglas Johnson to
fill a vacancy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allotments and Leisure Gardens
Advisory Group
|
-
|
Councillor Angela Argenzio to
fill a vacancy.
|
|
|
|
(d) representatives be
appointed to serve on other bodies as follows:-
|
|
|
|
South Yorkshire Pensions
Authority
|
-
|
Councillor Garry Weatherall to
replace Councillor Francyne Johnson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Yorkshire Police and
Crime Panel
|
-
|
Councillor Bryan Lodge to
replace Councillor Garry Weatherall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emergency Planning Shared
Services Joint Committee
|
-
|
Councillor Douglas Johnson to
fill a vacancy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environment Agency –
Yorkshire Regional Flood and Coastal Committee
|
-
|
Councillor Douglas Johnson to
fill a vacancy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Migration Yorkshire (SY
Sub-Regional Migration Group)
|
-
|
Councillor Alison Teal to
replace Councillor Garry Weatherall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
River Stewardship
Company
|
-
|
Councillor Douglas Johnson to
replace Councillor Garry Weatherall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheffield Business Adviser
Panel
|
-
|
Councillor Paul Turpin to fill
a vacancy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheffield Health and Social
...
view the full minutes text for item 10.
|
|