Agenda item

Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Licensing - Individual Cases

Report of the Chief Licensing Officer.

 

 

*(NOTE: The report at item 5 in the above agenda is not available to the public and press because it contains exempt information described in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended))

 

 

 

 

Minutes:

4.1

The Chief Licensing Officer submitted details in respect of three cases relating to hackney carriage and private hire licensing.

 

 

4.2

The applicant in Case No. 66/16 attended the hearing and addressed the Sub-Committee.

 

 

4.3

The licensee in Case No. 67/16 attended the hearing and addressed the Sub-Committee.

 

 

4.4

The licensee in Case No. 68/16 attended the hearing with a representative and they both addressed the Sub-Committee.

 

 

4.5

RESOLVED: That the cases now submitted be determined as follows:-

 

 

 

Case No.

Licence Type

Decision

 

 

 

 

 

66/16

Application for a new Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver’s Licence

Agree to grant a licence for a shorter term of 18 months in the light of the offence and conviction now reported and on the basis that the applicant requires a further medical examination in 18 months’ time.

 

 

 

 

 

67/16

Application to renew a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver’s Licence

(a) Agree to grant a licence for the term requested, subject to  the licensee (i) either producing a BTEC Level 2 Certificate ‘The Introduction to the Role of Professional Private Hire and Taxi Driver’, or completing that course within a period of 12 months from the grant of the licence and (ii) producing a Disclosure and Barring Service Certificate and (b) in the light of the offence and conviction now reported, the applicant be given a written warning, indicating that if there is any further cause for concern, the licence will be referred back to the Sub-Committee.

 

 

 

 

 

68/16

Application to renew a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Driver’s Licence

Refuse to grant a licence as the Sub-Committee does not consider the licensee to be a fit and proper person in the light of the offences now reported.