6.1
|
The Committee received the following questions
from members of the public, in attendance at the meeting.
|
6.2
|
Public Questioner 1
|
|
Referred to the transport issues on the
Hallamshire routes. This was causing difficulty getting to and from
Loxley and Wisewood. They asked if there was any information to
share about the future of busses around the Hillsborough
locality.
Councillor Gilligan
Kubo informed the member of public that she was the Deputy Chair of
the Transport and Regeneration Policy Committee. She explained that
the Council did not run the bus service, it was run by South
Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority and were currently going
through a process for companies to bid on running that service. It
was added that funding by the bus service would come to an end in
March 2023. Councillor Gilligan Kubo mentioned there was a meeting
scheduled with South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority.
|
6.3
|
Public Questioner 2
|
|
A member of the public
commented that one of the reasons why she moved to the Hillsborough
locality was due to good transport services. Although now it was
not the same as it once was. She mentioned that people were buying
bus passes that they would no longer be able to use.
Councillor Lindars-Hammond informed the member of public that he
had met with the managing directors at FIRST bus service, and that
there was no intention of them changing their minds on the cuts to
the service. He stated that there needed to be cross-party working,
with the communities, to try and convince people that there was
demand for a good bus service in Wisewood.
|
6.4
|
Public Questioner 3
|
|
Commented on South Yorkshire Combined
Authority not having the funding to run the bus service. She
explained that the people voted for cheap buses in 1971. People did
not need to use their cars as there was good transport services in
the area. She believed that this would not change until there was a
change in Government.
|
6.5
|
Public Questioner 4
|
|
Commented that local citizens needed to be
prepared to pay more local taxes to get better transport services
as these good services required more funding.
|
6.6
|
Public Questioner 5
|
|
Commented that there needed to be good working
relationships with the public sector. She suggested that the
Council looked at the impact bus services were having on people in
the area.
|
6.7
|
Public Questioner 6
|
|
Commented that these profitable services were
not providing an effective service for the people.
She referred to the food banks, which no one
wanted to see happen, but ultimately in desperate times, it
demonstrated how communities got together. She stated that the LAC
could use its network of communication to share information to many
citizens.
|
6.8
|
Public Questioner 7
|
|
Suggested the Council looked to hire buses from
Sheffield Community Transport as they currently provided a service
people that requested it. The Council could ask them what services
they run and how they can help.
|
6.9
|
Public Questioner 8
|
|
Asked if there was anything this LAC could do
regarding purchasing guest parking permits as the online process
was challenging.
Councillor Argenzio
agreed this needed to be better and would follow this up with
Customer Services.
|
6.10
|
Councillor Hunt commented on the transport
issues raised. He referred to the transport services in London
stating they were reliable and had a system that met the needs of
their residents. He added that the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined
Authority had a new Mayor, and that Sheffield City Council had the
ability to feed into that and influence decision-making. It was
mentioned that the Tram transport services were back in the public
control as of 2024.
Councillor Johnson added that one major factor
was that London had approximately four times more funding than
South Yorkshire. He agreed that the transport services in South
Yorkshire was not where it needed to be.
|