In light of the publication of the Street Trees Inquiry
Report:
1. When will
the Committee be examining and discussing the Street Tree Inquiry
Report given its pivotal role in upholding and maintaining
standards of conduct, and the clear and comprehensive failure of
these during the years of the street tree crisis as documented in
the Report?
2. Will the
Committee immediately be drawing the Report to the attention of the
auditors Ernst and Young given their statutory duties in
investigating and publishing Public Interest Reports and the very
serious situation the report documents?
3. In
November 2020 at full council (on zoom) there was what I and many
others regarded as a clear (and horrible) bullying incident
perpetrated on a public petitioner by the then Leader [name of
former Councillor redacted] (in her last but one
meeting). In fact I do not see
how anyone could describe it as anything but a clear bullying
incident. This was witnessed by all who were there and
immediately directly challenged on zoom by two subsequent public
questioners, including me.
Over the following
months at various council meetings I (and
also [name of public questioner redacted]) pursued
the question of what, if any, action had been taken following the
meeting, The answer appeared to be nothing. Eventually, in
March 2021 at full council I appeared to be being told by the then
Leader [name of former Councillor redacted] that I could
submit a complaint, if I wanted
to. This was despite the incident having been in plain sight,
witnessed by all, and I had already, immediately and directly at
the time, voiced my complaint. No one in Council took any
action at all.
At about the same
time, in Feb 2021, this Committee discussed a new Councillor
Code of Conduct and passed this on to full council for
ratification. (Finally) in a written answer to me at the end of
June 2021 [name of Councillor redacted] admitted that the
November 2020 meeting was “not our finest hour” and
also that, in discussing the new Code of Conduct this Committee had
not discussed councillor conduct towards citizens nor this specific
bullying incident - no one had raised it.
In light of the
Inquiry Report, the apparent failure of this Committee throughout
the street tree crisis years to fulfil its role to maintain
standards, but also at other times (as above), why should members
of the public have any confidence at all in this Committee to do
this work, let alone play its required pivotal role? Where is
the evidence that there has been any cultural or other shifts at
all in its approach to citizens who challenge, or attempt to hold
the council to account, when councillors and this committee have,
over many years, not even been able to mention let alone discuss
these serious issues, in plain sight?
If senior
councillors directly involved in the street trees crisis do not
resign, and if other councillors do not act - as they could - to
enforce basic standards, does this not mean the council "standards'
regime is utterly toothless? None one of our elected members should
command the confidence of the public should they, if they cannot
routinely and demonstrably uphold basic standards in public life
outside and before narrow political calculation?
|