Agenda item

Work Programme

Report of the Director of Policy and Democratic Engagement

Decision:

7.1

The Committee considered a report of the Director of Policy and Democratic Engagement on the Committee’s Work Programme detailing all known, substantive agenda items for forthcoming meetings of the Committee, to enable this committee, other committees, officers, partners, and the public to plan their work with and for the Committee.

 

 

7.2

RESOLVED: That the Transport, Regeneration and Climate Policy Committee:-

 

1.    Agree that the Committee’s work programme for the meeting of the 19th July, 2023 as set out in Appendix 1 be agreed, including any additions and amendments identified in Part 1 subject to the removal of the item Future of Green Parking Permits.

2.    Agree that all items listed for consideration at the meeting of the 20th September, 2023 and those for which no date is set, be reviewed by the committee before being confirmed on the Work Programme.

 

 

 

7.3

Reasons for Decision

 

 

7.3.1

To give the committee members an opportunity to consider the direction of the work programme, align it with their key priorities and create a manageable workload for the committee.

 

 

7.4

Alternatives Considered and Rejected

 

 

7.4.1

It was determined that the work programme presented by officers did not meet member priorities and required further consideration in terms of the workload of the committee.  

 

Minutes:

7.1

The Committee considered a report of the Director of Policy and Democratic Engagement on the Committee’s Work Programme detailing all known, substantive agenda items for forthcoming meetings of the Committee, to enable this committee, other committees, officers, partners, and the public to plan their work with and for the Committee.

7.2

Discussion took place around the priorities of the new committee post-election and how these could be incorporated into the work programme. The extensive workload of the committee was also noted and the number of projects that were already underway with a considerable amount of officer time already having been spent on them.

 

7.3

It was moved by Cllr Gamble-Pugh and seconded by Cllr Sangar, as an amendment, that the recommendations submitted be amended by the addition at the end of paragraph 1. of the words “subject to the removal of the Green Parking Permits item”. The amendment was put to the vote and carried.

 

(NOTE: The result of the vote was FOR – 7 Members; AGAINST – 2 Members; ABSTENTIONS – 0 Members.)

 

7.4

It was moved by Cllr Dimond and seconded by Cllr Gilligan-Kubo, as an amendment that the recommendations submitted be amended by the addition at the end of paragraph 1.of the words “subject to the addition of a feasibility study into a workplace parking levy for Sheffield”. The amendment was put to the vote and lost.

 

(NOTE: The result of the vote was FOR – 2 Members; AGAINST – 7 Members; ABSTENTIONS – 0 Members.)

 

7.5

During the discussion of the above item the Committee agreed, in accordance with Council Procedure Rules, that as the meeting was approaching the two hours and 30 minutes time limit, the meeting should be extended by a period of 30 minutes.

 

 

7.6

RESOLVED: That the Transport, Regeneration and Climate Policy Committee:-

 

1.    Agree that the Committee’s work programme for the meeting of the 19th July, 2023 as set out in Appendix 1 be agreed, including any additions and amendments identified in Part 1 subject to the removal of the item Future of Green Parking Permits.

2.    Agree that all items listed for consideration at the meeting of the 20th September, 2023 and those for which no date is set, be reviewed by the committee before being confirmed on the Work Programme.

 

 

 

7.7

Reasons for Decision

 

 

7.7.1

To give the committee members an opportunity to consider the direction of the work programme, align it with their key priorities and create a manageable workload for the committee.

 

 

7.8

Alternatives Considered and Rejected

 

 

7.8.1

It was determined that the work programme presented by officers did not meet member priorities and required further consideration in terms of the workload of the committee. 

 

Supporting documents: