Agenda item

6.1

A Supplementary Report had been circulated and published before the meeting containing an objection to the tree preservation order, as incorrect correspondence had been published in error.  The officer response was contained within the report.

6.2

Vanessa Lyons (Community Tree Officer) attended the meeting and presented the report.

6.3

The tree was being considered for a protection as planning permission had been granted for a small extension close to the tree.  Planning officers felt that the extension could be built with the tree in situ and a preservation order would add weight to the planning conditions.

6.4

The Community Tree Officer had visited the site and carried out a TEMPO assessment which had identified the tree as suitable for protection.

6.5

An objection to the order had been received and the officer response was contained within the report.

6.6

RESOLVED:- That Tree Preservation Order No. 470 be confirmed unmodified.