Agenda item

Walk in Centre Update

Report of Caroline Mabbott, Contracts Director, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

Minutes:

7.1

The report was presented by Rachel Beverley Stevenson (Executive Chair) and Dr William Dawson (CEO) of One Medicare, the independent NHS health care provider of the Walk in Centre.

 

The report gave an overview of the Sheffield Walk in Centre, details of the recent unannounced Care Quality Commission inspection of the service and the improvement work in response to the CQC’s findings.

 

7.2

In response to questions raised by Members, the following information was provided:

 

  • Regarding the action on confidentiality, there was now a Confidential Room near the reception.
  • The capacity of 70 patients was in line with fire safety. Usually there was not more than 50 people in the room at one time.
  • The figure of 96.4% of patients having a clinical consultation within 60 minutes referred to the initial triage rather than the subsequent clinical consultation.
  • Data on the areas patients resided in, could be provided.
  • The legal challenge to the inspection was in respect of the two warning notices. One Medicare had also had concerns regarding the consistency of inspections and the different ratings given in different regions.
  • Staff “huddles” and “circuit breakers” were mandatory.  Notes of them were taken which staff could access.
  • Figures for complaints could be provided. Staff behaviour and patient waiting times were the most common complaints, however this related to waiting times overall, including for 111 advice not just at the Walk in Centre.
  • One Medicare would be happy to work with Healthwatch to improve patient engagement.
  • The service employed a Clinical Educator, and time for staff training was made by “double running” staffing.  Also, paid learning time was provided for the Clinical Practitioner Programme.
  • Staff turnover rate had improved and increased recruitment had taken place.  Figures for staff retention could be provided.
  • Data was tracked in order to anticipate periods of high demand.
  • The service had to see every patient that walked through the door, they could not turn people away or send them elsewhere.
  • The senior leaders from One Medicare who were overseeing improvements would have a 3-month handover period with the new Operational Manager who was in the process of being recruited.
  • Some extra training for staff was paid and some was in their own time.
  • The NHS representatives were not sure why patients who lived in Chesterfield and Rotherham were using the service, but it could be due to them working in Sheffield.
  • Managing “patient flow” was key to infection control, but this was challenging due to staff resources. Also, the ability to separate different categories of patients was limited by the available space.
  • The potential of expanding into some spare available space in the same building, was being discussed with the Landlord.
  • More similar centres which fill the gap between GP Services and A&E would be of benefit to the City.

 

7.3

The Chair stated that she had visited the Centre and had been shown around the Wellbeing Hub, she asked why this service had been started, what the uptake had been and whether it could be scaled up and replicated elsewhere?  Dr Dawson advised that this service was at the heart of their model and had been put in place around four years earlier in a different Centre.  It aimed to offer people time to talk about any wider problems with their physical and mental health.  The Hub had been worked on with Sheffield Teaching Hospitals and had seen over 1000 patients in the last year.

 

7.4

Members requested a further update be brought to the Committee when the CQC report was received.

 

7.5

RESOLVED: That the Sub Committee notes the update.

 

 

Supporting documents: