5.1
|
A presentation
regarding the proposed scheme on the A61 Chesterfield Road, to
improve public transport and road safety by giving buses priority,
was delivered by Mark Gibbons, Senior Transport Planner, Sheffield
City Council and Neal Byers, Consultant. The presentation, which was subsequently published
on the Council’s website, outlined the background to the
project, its current status, the
delivery themes and the next steps.
|
5.2
|
The following
information was provided by Mark Gibbons and Neal Byers in response
to questions from members of the public:-
- Comments
made in previous consultations by shopkeepers along the route,
including views on any potential loss of trade had been taken into
consideration and they would be consulted again later in the
scheme.
- Some
parking provision might change but there were no plans to reduce
overall provision.
-
Provision of accessible parking spaces would be considered in the
detailed design stage.
- Officers
were aware of the previous scheme which had taken place near St
Thomas’s Church.
- The
issue of traffic displacement was being evaluated via traffic
modelling. If it was found that there
was likely to be a negative effect, this would be manged/ mitigated
as the aim of the project was to encourage bus use and enable buses
to run on time.
- No
short term fluctuation in the level of
bus fares was anticipated but the providers set their own rates
(which could be capped by the Council).
- The
governance arrangements for buses were being reviewed and any
resulting changes, would be more likely to have
an effect on fares than any aspect of the A61 scheme, which
should assist operators with regards to affordability.
- Cycling
infrastructure would potentially be improved by the extension of
the Sheaf Valley Cycle Route, which was thought to be preferable to
mixing bicycles with buses.
-
Consideration was being given to whether there were opportunities
to improve cycling infrastructure along the A61.
- The
budget was insufficient to address traffic “necking” at
Heeley Bridge, which was a civil engineering scale matter.
-
Compulsory purchase, e.g. for car parking had been considered and
was part of the options appraisal.
Whether it would be used would be dependent on funding.
- Current
issues regarding traffic at Meadowhead
Roundabout were acknowledged but this project would not provide
sufficient funding to completely resolve them.
|