Agenda item

High Street Mosborough - Limited Waiting Parking Bays

Report of the Executive Director City Futures

Decision:

18.1

Members considered a report of the Executive Director of City Futures that detailed the consultation response to proposals to introduce Limited Waiting Parking Bays on Mosborough High Street, report the receipt of objections to the Experimental Traffic Order (ETO)  and set out the Council’s response.

 

 

18.2

RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Transport, Regeneration and Climate Policy Committee:-

 

a)    Having considered the representations received and thus satisfied that the reasons to support the proposals outweigh any unwithdrawn objections, to:

• Make permanent the Experimental Traffic Order, as currently implemented, in accordance with the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984; and

• Before the order is implemented, ask that the objectors are informed.

 

 

18.3

Reasons for Decision

 

 

18.3.1

The implementation of the Mosborough High Street - Limited Waiting Parking Bays experimental traffic order has resulted in a limited number of objections, but it has also resulted in the opportunity for more visitors to utilise the parking bays in a district shopping centre.

18.3.2

The parking survey undertaken post scheme implementation, noted that drivers are on the whole respecting the restrictions. An increase in individual vehicles was recorded within the restricted area as being approximately 50% higher than pre scheme. These results suggest the scheme has increased the turnover of vehicles and improved numbers of short stay visitors, resulting in more spaces being available on average.

18.3.3

The survey also indicated that parking has not been adversely affected on Stone Street or Church Mews.

18.3.4

Having considered the responses from the public and other consultees and in light of the parking survey information obtained, it is recommended that the ETO is made permanent in full.

 

 

18.4

Alternatives Considered and Rejected

 

 

18.4.1

The parking bays could be pay to park spaces instead of time limited parking. This would help with turnover and enforcement. It is likely that this would not be well received by the community or local businesses and may have an adverse effect on trade. It may also cause additional migration of parking onto nearby residential streets, as vehicle users would utilise the nearby unrestricted parking instead of paying a fee.

18.4.2

Do nothing was also considered but this would likely result in business employees moving back onto the street and parking for the majority of the day. It would make it more difficult for customers to park and may reduce trade for the businesses themselves.

 

Minutes:

18.1

Members considered a report of the Executive Director of City Futures that detailed the consultation response to proposals to introduce Limited Waiting Parking Bays on Mosborough High Street, report the receipt of objections to the Experimental Traffic Order (ETO)  and set out the Council’s response.

 

 

18.2

RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Transport, Regeneration and Climate Policy Committee:-

 

a)    Having considered the representations received and thus satisfied that the reasons to support the proposals outweigh any unwithdrawn objections, to:

• Make permanent the Experimental Traffic Order, as currently implemented, in accordance with the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984; and

• Before the order is implemented, ask that the objectors are informed.

 

 

18.3

Reasons for Decision

 

 

18.3.1

The implementation of the Mosborough High Street - Limited Waiting Parking Bays experimental traffic order has resulted in a limited number of objections, but it has also resulted in the opportunity for more visitors to utilise the parking bays in a district shopping centre.

18.3.2

The parking survey undertaken post scheme implementation, noted that drivers are on the whole respecting the restrictions. An increase in individual vehicles was recorded within the restricted area as being approximately 50% higher than pre scheme. These results suggest the scheme has increased the turnover of vehicles and improved numbers of short stay visitors, resulting in more spaces being available on average.

18.3.3

The survey also indicated that parking has not been adversely affected on Stone Street or Church Mews.

18.3.4

Having considered the responses from the public and other consultees and in light of the parking survey information obtained, it is recommended that the ETO is made permanent in full.

 

 

18.4

Alternatives Considered and Rejected

 

 

18.4.1

The parking bays could be pay to park spaces instead of time limited parking. This would help with turnover and enforcement. It is likely that this would not be well received by the community or local businesses and may have an adverse effect on trade. It may also cause additional migration of parking onto nearby residential streets, as vehicle users would utilise the nearby unrestricted parking instead of paying a fee.

18.4.2

Do nothing was also considered but this would likely result in business employees moving back onto the street and parking for the majority of the day. It would make it more difficult for customers to park and may reduce trade for the businesses themselves.

 

Supporting documents: