Agenda item

Grounds Maintenance and Estate Services Review

Report of the Executive Director, Place

Decision:

8.1

The Executive Director, Place submitted a report in relation to the Grounds Maintenance and Estate Services review.

 

 

8.2

RESOLVED: That Cabinet:-

 

 

 

(a)

notes the contents of the report and the services efficiencies and savings that can be achieved for the HRA and General Fund;

 

 

 

 

(b)

approves the delivery of Housing grounds maintenance by a single service and that is to be achieved by the transfer of Estate Officers from the Council Housing Service to the Parks and Public Realm service with a review of the structures and job descriptions across Parks and Public Realm and Estate services;

 

 

 

 

(c)

approves the reconfiguration of the remaining Council Housing estate services functions following the transfer of grounds maintenance work to Parks and Public Realm; and

 

 

 

 

(d)

authorises the Director of Culture and Environment and the Interim Director of Housing and Neighbourhood Services to take the necessary steps to implement these recommendations.

 

 

 

8.3

Reasons for Decision

 

 

8.3.1

The recommendations have the potential to improve equality of service delivery, maintain standards and provide financial savings to both the Housing Revenue Account and the General Fund resulting from increased efficiency.

 

 

8.4

Alternatives Considered and Rejected

 

 

8.4.1

Five alternative options were considered during the options appraisal. The full details of the options appraisal methodology and results of the appraisal are included in Appendices B and C of the report.

 

 

8.4.2

In addition, integration of the Parks and Public Realm SLA work for Housing into the Council Housing Service’s estate services were considered during the options appraisal. The Parks and Public Realm services were fully merged in 2012. Improvements in efficiency as a result of this merger, led to savings of 11% for employee costs and 6% of other costs. Officers felt that previous efficiencies and savings would be lost if Parks and Public Realm were to be disaggregated and therefore there would be a corresponding rise in costs in these areas.

 

 

6.3

This option was discounted by the options appraisal as the cost of delivering the service could increase significantly and therefore did not offer value for money.

 

 

6.5

Any Interest Declared or Dispensation Granted

 

 

 

None

 

 

6.6

Reason for Exemption if Public/Press Excluded During Consideration

 

 

 

None

 

 

6.7

Respective Director Responsible for Implementation

 

 

 

Simon Green, Executive Director, Place

 

 

6.8

Relevant Scrutiny and Policy Development Committee If Decision Called In

 

 

 

Safer and Stronger Communities

 

Minutes:

8.1

The Executive Director, Place submitted a report in relation to the Grounds Maintenance and Estate Services review.

 

 

8.2

RESOLVED: That Cabinet:-

 

 

 

(a)

notes the contents of the report and the services efficiencies and savings that can be achieved for the HRA and General Fund;

 

 

 

 

(b)

approves the delivery of Housing grounds maintenance by a single service and that is to be achieved by the transfer of Estate Officers from the Council Housing Service to the Parks and Public Realm service with a review of the structures and job descriptions across Parks and Public Realm and Estate services;

 

 

 

 

(c)

approves the reconfiguration of the remaining Council Housing estate services functions following the transfer of grounds maintenance work to Parks and Public Realm; and

 

 

 

 

(d)

authorises the Director of Culture and Environment and the Interim Director of Housing and Neighbourhood Services to take the necessary steps to implement these recommendations.

 

 

 

8.3

Reasons for Decision

 

 

8.3.1

The recommendations have the potential to improve equality of service delivery, maintain standards and provide financial savings to both the Housing Revenue Account and the General Fund resulting from increased efficiency.

 

 

8.4

Alternatives Considered and Rejected

 

 

8.4.1

Five alternative options were considered during the options appraisal. The full details of the options appraisal methodology and results of the appraisal are included in Appendices B and C of the report.

 

 

8.4.2

In addition, integration of the Parks and Public Realm SLA work for Housing into the Council Housing Service’s estate services were considered during the options appraisal. The Parks and Public Realm services were fully merged in 2012. Improvements in efficiency as a result of this merger, led to savings of 11% for employee costs and 6% of other costs. Officers felt that previous efficiencies and savings would be lost if Parks and Public Realm were to be disaggregated and therefore there would be a corresponding rise in costs in these areas.

 

 

6.3

This option was discounted by the options appraisal as the cost of delivering the service could increase significantly and therefore did not offer value for money.

 

 

 

Supporting documents: