Use the search options below to find information regarding decisions that have been taken by the Council’s decision making bodies.
Alternatively you can visit the officer decisions page for information on officer delegated decisions that have been taken by council officers.
Decision Maker: South Local Area Committee
Made at meeting: 01/10/2024 - South Local Area Committee
Decision published: 01/10/2024
Effective from: 01/10/2024
Decision:
7.1 |
Funding delegated by the Council to LACs in 2024/25 amounts to £100,000 per LAC to address issues identified in the South Community Plan. Following consultation with the South LAC Members it is proposed that, as in 2023/24, this budget should be allocated so that £25,000 is spent per ward. Of this £625 per ward will be used to create a £2500 operations budget, leaving £24,375 per ward to spend on Community Plan priority issues.
In order to enable financial decisions to be made more quickly, given the delays caused by the two pre-election periods (local election and general election) it is recommended that the level of expenditure that can be approved by the Community Services Manager in consultation with the LAC Chair under the authority delegated by the LAC is raised to sums up to £10,000. All other conditions would remain the same so decisions may be taken provided that:
|
|
|
7.2 |
RESOLVED: That the South Local Area Committee:
|
|
|
7.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
|
|
|
The South LAC is asked to approach to its 2024/25 budget outlined in the report to address the identified local priorities within the South LAC Community Plan.
|
|
|
7.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
|
|
|
The LAC could choose not to allocate budgets at this stage, but this would delay local projects and facilities for local communities.
Decisions on grant awards could be reserved to the LAC but this would inevitably delay delivery of priority actions to address specific issues identified in the Community Plan.
All decisions on expenditure to support Community Plan priorities could be delegated to officers. However, this would restrict and undermine the LAC’s ability to monitor its delegated budget and delivery of the Community Plan.
|
Decision Maker: Strategy and Resources Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 25/09/2024 - Strategy and Resources Policy Committee
Decision published: 30/09/2024
Effective from: 25/09/2024
Decision:
36.
|
Work Programme
|
||
36.1 |
The Committee received a report containing the Committee’s Work Programme for consideration and discussion. The aim of the Work Programme is to show all known, substantive agenda items for forthcoming meetings of the Committee, to enable this committee, other committees, officers, partners and the public to plan their work with and for the Committee. It was highlighted that this is a live document and Members input to it was invaluable.
It was noted that, subsequent to the publication of the agenda papers, it was now intended that the (i) Housing Growth Delivery Plan item be submitted to the November meeting, rather than October. This was to allow for the extra work needed to support the Local Plan examination and (ii) the Working Better Together item would now be a broader report with a new title.
In addition it was proposed that the Strategy and Resources Policy Committee agree that Waste and Street Scene Policy Committee should consider the Gambling Act 2005 – Statement of Principles (Gambling Policy) 2025 item at it's next meeting on 8 November and submit the item straight to Full Council on 4 December. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That Strategy and Resources Policy Committee:-
(a) agrees the Committee’s work programme, as set out in Appendix 1, including the additions and amendments identified in Paragraph 4 of the report;
(b) that the Housing Growth Delivery Plan item be moved to the list of items for the November meeting in the Work Programme, rather than the October meeting, as now reported;
(c) agrees that that Waste and Street Scene Policy Committee should consider the Gambling Act 2005 – Statement of Principles (Gambling Policy) 2025 item at it's next meeting on 8 November and submit the item straight to Full Council on 4 December;
(d) that it be noted that the Working Better Together item will now be a broader report with a new title; and
(e) that approval be given to the consideration of cross cutting issues as detailed in Paragraph 5 the report. |
|
|
Decision Maker: Strategy and Resources Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 25/09/2024 - Strategy and Resources Policy Committee
Decision published: 30/09/2024
Effective from: 25/09/2024
Decision:
The Executive Director Neighbourhood Services submitted a report outlining proposals for Sheffield City Council to carry out five yearly electrical testing and condition reports for all domestic Council dwellings rented to customers. The report outlines the budget requirement to deliver this programme of work and requests the additional budget allocation needed in order to deliver all necessary aspects of this work. |
|
|
|
10.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That Strategy and Resources Policy Committee:- |
|
|
|
(a) approves the additional revenue budget allocation required within the Housing Revenue Account as set out in sections 2.14, 2.15 and 2.16 of the report now submitted; and |
|
|
|
(b) endorses the proposed approach for the Council to commission two external contractors to deliver the carrying out of five yearly electrical testing and condition reports for domestic council dwellings let to customers. |
|
|
10.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
|
|
10.3.1 |
The Council is required by law to ensure that we carry out regular electrical inspections of domestic dwellings that it lets to customers, and it is current best practice that these inspections should be undertaken at least every 5 years. |
|
|
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
|
|
|
10.4.1 |
As described above, the Council is required by law to ensure that we carry out regular electrical inspections of domestic dwellings that it lets to customers. Therefore, no other alternatives were considered. There are consequences of not carrying out these inspections and these are outlined in more detail in item 8.17 of this report. |
Decision Maker: Strategy and Resources Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 25/09/2024 - Strategy and Resources Policy Committee
Decision published: 30/09/2024
Effective from: 25/09/2024
Decision:
Decision Maker: Finance and Performance Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 23/09/2024 - Finance and Performance Policy Committee
Decision published: 27/09/2024
Effective from: 23/09/2024
Decision:
11.1 |
The Committee considered a report of the Finance Manager which provided details of proposed changes to the existing Capital Programme, as brought forward in Month 04 of 2024/25. |
|
|
11.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Finance and Performance Policy Committee: -
- That the committee approve the proposed additions and variations to the Capital Programme listed in Appendix 1 - That the committee approve the acceptance of grant funding as identified in Appendix 2 |
|
|
11.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
|
|
11.3.1 |
The proposed changes to the Capital programme will improve the services to the people of Sheffield. |
|
|
11.4 |
Alternative Options Considered |
|
|
11.4.1 |
A number of alternative courses of action are considered as part of the process undertaken by Officers before decisions are recommended to Members. The recommendations made to Members represent what Officers believe to be the best options available to the Council, in line with Council priorities, given the constraints on funding and the use to which funding is put within the Revenue Budget and the Capital Programme. |
Decision Maker: Finance and Performance Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 23/09/2024 - Finance and Performance Policy Committee
Decision published: 27/09/2024
Effective from: 23/09/2024
Decision:
10.1 |
The Finance and Performance Policy Committee received a report of the Director of Finance and Commercial Services which requested the commissioning of a new 5-year contract for merchant acquiring services. It was stated that the primary goal of the commission would be to obtain more competitive transaction fees, which was expected to significantly reduce the costs associated with processing card payments. |
|
|
10.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Finance and Performance Policy Committee: -
- Approve the commissioning of a 5-year contract, with an estimated value of £4,125,000 (£825k per annum), for merchant acquiring services for Sheffield City Council. |
|
|
10.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
|
|
10.3.1 |
The recommendation to commission a new merchant acquiring service is aimed at securing more competitive transaction fees. By re-contracting for merchant acquiring service, it is anticipated that the Council can significantly reduce the costs associated with processing card payments. These financial savings can be reallocated to other essential services and projects, enhancing the overall fiscal health of Sheffield City Council. |
|
|
10.4 |
Alternative Options Considered |
|
|
10.4.1 |
As this is third party spend at a level that triggers a procurement under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 and the Standing Orders of the Council there is no opportunity to consider options other than the route to market. |
|
|
10.4.2 |
There is an option to do nothing, however, it would lead to increased costs for our merchant acquiring services with the current provider. Given the rising transaction volume and value, there is an opportunity for cost savings. This would also not be compliant with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. |
Decision Maker: Finance and Performance Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 23/09/2024 - Finance and Performance Policy Committee
Decision published: 27/09/2024
Effective from: 23/09/2024
Decision:
9.
9.1
9.2
|
COUNCIL PLAN OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK – Q1 BASELINE REPORT
The Finance and Performance Policy Committee considered a report of the Director of Finance and Commercial Services which presented the first Outcomes Framework report to Committee which included current, historic and comparator data, where available.
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Finance and Performance Policy Committee: -
1. Note the Council Plan Outcomes Framework Q1 Baseline Report the starting point for the measures that evidence our improvements and show distance travelled against each Council plan priority. 2. Agree to continue to receive quarterly reports that provide an overview of performance against the Outcome measures, describing performance challenges, interventions taken, and the results of changes made. 3. Consider, and ask all other policy committees to consider, if issues raised in this performance report should have further scrutiny through the scheduling of time on the appropriate committee work programme.
|
9.3 |
Reasons for Decision
|
9.3.1
|
The Outcomes Framework will underpin how we measure progress and monitor impact of the Council Plan. It is aligned to our four-year Medium Term Financial Strategy and the outcomes will increasingly become the focus for our budget, Directorate and Service Plans. |
9.3.2 |
Council Plan Outcomes Framework Q1 Baseline Report sets the starting point for the measures that evidence distance travelled against the Council Plan priorities as part of a systematic process of robust corporate performance reporting. |
|
|
9.3.3 |
To ensure that Finance & Performance Policy Committee contributes to the performance management process and drives improvement across the organisation. |
|
|
9.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
|
|
9.4.1 |
Previous decisions made requires officers to proceed with implementing the full performance framework to underpin how we measure progress and monitor impact of the Council Plan. It is aligned to our four-year Medium Term Financial Strategy and the outcomes will increasingly become enabling elements for our priority-based budget plans, Directorate and Service going forwards and set a key deliverable for the Council. |
|
|
9.4.2 |
Beyond some nuance of how we implement some details of the framework, the measures, performance system and reporting cycles are agreed, removing the alternative options available for implementation of the framework. |
Decision Maker: Finance and Performance Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 23/09/2024 - Finance and Performance Policy Committee
Decision published: 27/09/2024
Effective from: 23/09/2024
Decision:
|
LEASE OF LAND AT MILLHOUSES PARK ADJOINING WAGGON AND HORSES PUBLIC HOUSE, ABBEYDALE ROAD
|
8.1 |
The Committee considered a report of the Executive Director, City Futures which was a revised proposal to grant a lease of land following the originally proposed tenant going into administration. |
|
|
8.2 |
RESOLVED (NOTE: The result of the vote on the resolution was FOR - 7 Members; AGAINST – 1 Member): That the Finance and Performance Policy Committee:
- Note the current position and endorse the granting of a lease on the revised terms as set out in this report. - Note that as the land to be disposed of is open space and that prior to the disposal, notices advertising the same are required to be given pursuant to section 123(2a) of the Local Government Act 1972. Committee is asked to note that should any objections be raised pursuant to the notices a report will be brought to committee to consider the objections. - If no objections are raised, then the Committee notes that no further meeting is required and the Chief Property will proceed with the disposal of the land as per the revised terms set out in this report. |
|
|
8.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
|
|
8.3.1 |
Following the earlier Committee decision, the previous tenant (TNB) has gone into administration and the new company (TNBCo) has experienced difficult trading conditions with increased costs from suppliers and reduced demand due to the cost-of-living crisis. This has resulted in reduced sales turnover and subsequently the offer of a reduced rental for the beer garden / external trading area. |
|
|
8.3.2 |
The offer to discontinue ice cream sales at the kiosk would remove competition and should enable trading levels to return to previous levels in Millhouses Park for the ice cream concession. |
|
|
8.3.3 |
The space within Millhouses Park proposed for lease by TBN was an unused, low quality grassed area within the park. The area was shaded under heavy cover from large trees. It was separated from larger grassed areas by the path network. The use of this piece of land has therefore not negatively impacted on the ability of local and city residents to use the green space for recreational activities. |
|
|
8.3.4 |
The introduction of a second refreshment offer within the park during the summer months adds to the offer available to park goers and provides a further opportunity to take on refreshments and rest whilst in the park. A second facility provides variety to park users and those passing by the park.
|
8.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
|
|
8.4.1 |
Alternative Option 1: To do nothing is not considered a realistic option as the Council is currently not receiving rental income from the use of the land and the occupation by TNBCo requires formalising. |
|
|
8.4.2 |
Alternative Option 2: Withdraw the offer of a lease and seek to take back possession of the site. This does still remain an option for the Council. TNBCo have threatened to bring a legal action against the Council to recoup the costs of their investment estimated by TNBCo at circa £165,000. There is no detail of the basis of any claim by the new company and how it would recover money spent by the company that is now in administration. |
Decision Maker: Housing Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 19/09/2024 - Housing Policy Committee
Decision published: 26/09/2024
Effective from: 19/09/2024
Decision:
13.1.1 |
In July 2024 Sheffield City Council (the Council) received a regulatory judgement from the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) confirming a consumer grading of C3 indicating serious failings in the landlord. The Regulator found that Sheffield City Council was not delivering the required outcomes of the Safety and Quality Consumer Standard. |
13.1.2 |
Members considered a report of the Executive Director Neighbourhood Services provide reassurance to the Committee that our programme of improvement activity will help us to meet the Regulator’s Safety and Quality Consumer Standard.
|
|
|
13.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Housing Policy Committee:-
|
|
1. Notes the Council’s response to the Regulatory Judgement issued on 9th July 2024 2. Requests that progress in meeting the requirements of the Consumer Standards is reported to this Committee through the routine quarterly performance reports. 3. Formally records its thanks to Peter Brown for his long service with the Council, his diligent work with the committee and for improving the lives of tenants in Sheffield. |
|
|
13.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
13.3.1 |
To acknowledge the programme of improvement activity that will help the Council to meet the Regulator’s Safety and Quality Consumer Standard and address the concerns raised by the Regulator in their regulatory notice and subsequent judgement. |
|
|
13.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
13.4.1 |
It is a regulatory requirement for the Council to engage with the RSH in response to a Regulatory Judgement, so on this occasion, no alternative options were considered. |
Decision Maker: Housing Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 19/09/2024 - Housing Policy Committee
Decision published: 26/09/2024
Effective from: 19/09/2024
Decision:
12.1 |
Members considered a report of the Interim Director of Housing updating the Housing Policy Committee on the delivery and progress of the Homeless Prevention and Rough Sleeping Strategy Action Plan which underpins the Homeless Prevention and Rough Sleepers Strategy, 2023 – 2028. The Strategy and Action Plan is now in the second year of delivery. The report provides an overview of the delivery thus far, seeks endorsement of continued delivery, and approval of the 12 new actions identified and deletion of 1 action. |
|
|
12.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Housing Policy Committee:-
1. Continues endorsement of the delivery of the Strategy and Action Plan. 2. Approves 12 new actions and the deletion of 1 action as set out in the report. |
|
|
12.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
12.3.1 |
Homelessness continues to be a key challenge in Sheffield, with consistently high number of Homeless Presentations to the Council. This impacts the use of TA, provision and subsequently increases financial pressures to the Council. In addition, the impact of Homelessness of the person is significant, and in some cases can have long lasting effects, resulting in reduced opportunities. |
12.3.2 |
Although improvement is being made in preventing Homelessness, with good progression on the delivery of the Homeless Prevention Strategy, it is essential we continue to deliver the existing and new actions to further advance prevention of Homelessness. |
|
|
12.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
12.4.1 |
Alternative Option 1: Not making amendments to the current action Plan. Not making amendments to the current action plan, would result in not responding appropriately to ongoing and evolving Homelessness challenges and pressures. This would potentially increase risk and impact on the financial pressures associated with Homelessness, the Council’s ability to meet statutory duties and responsibilities and reputational impact with partners, by not responding to feedback, consultation and emerging challenges. |
|
|
Decision Maker: Housing Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 19/09/2024 - Housing Policy Committee
Decision published: 26/09/2024
Effective from: 19/09/2024
Decision:
11.1 |
Members considered a report of the Executive Director, Neighbourhood Services seeking approval to commission a contract with an external provider for Security Shuttering and Clean & Clearance Services of vacant properties for the Council.
|
|
|
11.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Housing Policy Committee:-
|
|
1. Approve the commissioning of Security Shuttering Services and Clean & Clearance services to vacant properties for a period of 4 years with an estimated value of up to £4,150,000, as set out in this report. 2. Notes the impact of the proposal set out in this report on the 2025/2026 business plan and future years, as set out in paragraph 7.2. This will need to be mitigated or included in future business planning. |
|
|
11.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
11.3.1 |
Preferred option – to commission the appropriate contract in the manner described in section 1 of this report. This will help enable the Council to continue to provide this key service. The commission of the contract will ensure the Council is operating in accordance with the Public Contract Regulations 2015 and achieving best value in its procurement of the services. |
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
11.4.1 |
Alternative Option 1: Do nothing - This is not an option as the Council has the ongoing requirement for shuttering and clean & clearance services and public procurement regulations dictate that we procure a compliant contract for the delivery of these services. |
11.4.2 |
Alternative Option 2: Self-Deliver - this is not an option; the service has neither the capacity or expertise to deliver these goods and services without the assistance of an external service provider |
11.4.3 |
Alternative Option 3: Further extend existing contract – this is not an option as all available contract extensions have been utilised. As ever, Council must adhere to the Public Contract Regulations 2015 (PCR) thus further variations (value and duration) are not deemed easily reconcilable with the provisions set out within PCR. |
Decision Maker: Housing Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 19/09/2024 - Housing Policy Committee
Decision published: 26/09/2024
Effective from: 19/09/2024
Decision:
10.1 |
The committee considered a report of the Executive Director Neighbourhood Services providing an overview of housing and repairs performance for a range of services within its remit. The report covered the period up to quarter 1 2024/25 (April – June 2024). A detailed appendix report was included with comparative data against other landlords where available and regulatory performance. The report enabled the Committee to understand and comment on the performance delivery of housing and repairs services to both tenants and citizens. |
|
|
10.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Housing Policy Committee:-
1. Notes the performance report update provided for quarter 1 2024/25 (April – June 2024) 2. Formally notes its thanks to all members of staff who have contributed to the improvements in performance across the service. |
|
|
10.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
10.3.1 |
The Housing Policy Committee has delegated authority to monitor the performance of Housing and Repairs services to ensure that: • The service is delivering for tenants, and that tenant satisfaction in closely monitored • Limited resources are maximised due to budgetary pressures • The Council is delivering on corporate priorities Performance information is shared with external organisations such as the Regulator of Social Housing and the Housing Ombudsman for scrutiny. |
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
10.4.1 |
The Housing Policy Committee has delegated responsibility for the regular monitoring of data including performance and financial information, and the performance monitoring of Housing (public sector, private sector, and related functions) services. Therefore, no alternative options to the production of this report have been considered. |
|
|
Decision Maker: Housing Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 19/09/2024 - Housing Policy Committee
Decision published: 26/09/2024
Effective from: 19/09/2024
Decision:
9.1 |
The Finance Manager presented a report that brought the Committee up to date with the Council’s General Fund revenue outturn position for 2024/25 as at quarter 1. |
|
|
9.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Housing Policy Committee: - 1. Notes the updated information on the 2024/25 Revenue Budget Outturn as described in this report including the detailed committee budget monitoring information and management actions provided. 2. Agrees that the Chair write to the Government’s Minister for Housing to request that Housing Benefit payments made to residents cover the cost of providing them with Housing. |
|
|
9.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
9.3.1 |
To record formally changes to the Revenue Budget. |
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
9.4.1 |
The Council is required to both set a balance budget and to ensure that in-year income and expenditure are balanced. No other alternatives were considered. |
|
|
Decision Maker: Housing Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 19/09/2024 - Housing Policy Committee
Decision published: 26/09/2024
Effective from: 19/09/2024
Decision:
8.1 |
Members considered a report of the Executive Director of Neighbourhood Services outlining a forward agenda for the Housing Policy Committee for the 2024/25 year, setting out the key steps this Committee needs to take to build on the progress made last year and to deliver the Council Plan. This includes the need to prioritise resources on Council Plan outcomes and become a community and customer focused organisation to deliver high quality services for the people of Sheffield and address the financial pressure facing the Council. |
|
|
8.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Housing Policy Committee:-
|
|
1. Notes the progress made in 2023/24, recognising the work of Elected Members, officers and partners to deliver against our objectives and support strong strategic foundations for the organisation. 2. Considered the key issues identified in section 3 of the report as part of our forward agenda for 2024/25. 3. Agrees to work across Policy Committees to ensure the opportunities and issues identified in section 3 are taken forward as part of the Council Plan in 2024/25. |
|
|
8.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
8.3.1 |
The recommendations support the continued strategic development of the organisation and will enable the delivery of our Council Plan by agreeing the key issues that this Committee needs to address in the 2024/25 year. |
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
8.4.1 |
Not to set out a forward agenda for 2024/25 – this was rejected because having agreed a new Council Plan, we need to set out for citizens the things we want to achieve in 2024/25. |
|
|
Decision Maker: Housing Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 19/09/2024 - Housing Policy Committee
Decision published: 26/09/2024
Effective from: 19/09/2024
Decision:
14.1.1 |
Changes to Regulations and inspection regimes has resulted in a substantial increase in the number of fire safety responsive repairs being identified and remedial works required. |
14.1.2 |
Sheffield City Council’s internal Repairs and Maintenance Service currently do not have the capacity to deliver the large number of fire related responsive repairs and there is a significant risk of repairs not being closed within defined timescales. This could put residents and visitors at risk. |
14.1.3 |
Members considered a report of the Interim Housing Director recommending that the Council procure and commission a competent contractor to deliver fire safety remedial works on behalf of Sheffield City Council Repairs and Maintenance service managed by the Housing Fire Safety Team to effectively manage the repairs. |
|
|
14.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Housing Policy Committee:-
|
|
1. Agrees the proposal for the operational arrangements for managing responsive Housing fire safety remedial works 2. Gives approval to procure and commission a competent third-party fire safety contractor to undertake responsive repairs related to fire safety. Moving from an in-house model to an external solution to allow SCC to discharge its duties. |
|
|
14.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
14.3.1 |
The decision to utilise the already approved Housing Revenue Account (HRA) funding to commission a competent third-party Fire Safety Contractor for responsive fire safety repairs is essential to ensure compliance with regulatory standards and to mitigate significant risks to residents and visitors. |
|
|
14.3.2 |
The internal Repairs and Maintenance Service currently lacks the capacity to manage the volume of fire safety repairs, posing a serious risk of non-compliance with the Regulator of Social Housing’s requirements. Without timely action, the number of overdue fire safety repairs is likely to increase, jeopardizing the Council’s ability to meet its statutory obligations as a landlord. |
|
|
14.3.3 |
Moving to an external partner solution rather than an in-house model will allow SCC to discharge its duties. By commissioning an external contractor, the Council can effectively address the current capacity shortfall, maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, and fulfil its duty to provide safe and decent housing for its tenants. |
|
|
14.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
14.4.1 |
Alternative Option 1: Do nothing – Not an option The Council must be able to discharge its duties. Do nothing is not a viable option and not only puts the council at risk of financial penalties but could put residents at unnecessary risk and in some case could pose a significant threat to life if repairs are not completed in a timely manner. |
|
|
14.4.2 |
Alternative Option 2: Increase Repairs and Maintenance Resource – Not an Option Our internal Repairs and Maintenance Service currently do not have the capacity to deliver the large number of fire related responsive repairs and there is a significant risk of jobs not being closed within defined timescales. The Service explored increasing the resource however the time taken to recruit and train operative to the required standard will further increase the backlog of repairs. |
|
|
Decision Maker: Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 18/09/2024 - Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Decision published: 25/09/2024
Effective from: 18/09/2024
Decision:
The Service Manager introduced the report which provided the six-monthly Adult Care and Wellbeing Safeguarding update for assurance to the Committee.
Endorsement is requested from Committee to continue to the work set out in the Safeguarding Delivery Plan and for the Sheffield Adult Safeguarding Partnership (SASP) Annual Report. Approval is sought for an Early Indicators of Concern Guidance. This sets out an approach to identify early any concerns which may require a planned response and process to follow to prevent harm from occurring. Approval was also sought for a commissioning strategy to undertake best interest assessors where there is little or no capacity within the in-house Deprivation of Liberty Orders Service.
|
|
9.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Adult Health
and Social Care Policy Committee:-
|
9.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
9.3.1 |
An approved delivery plan for the strategy gives a structured approach to delivery of safeguarding improvements so that Members and the public can be assured that Adult Care is delivering upon its commitment to protect people from abuse and harm. It will also provide greater accountability and transparency of how will do this.
Asking for regular updates and refreshes of the plan will keep the Committee, wider stakeholders, and the public the ability to hold the Council to account for progress and provide an additional mechanism to input to future development.
Providing approval for a Commissioning Strategy to recruit an
external agency to provide Best Interest Assessors (BIA) for a
5-year period, with option of extension options on a year-by-year
basis, to enable a response to surge in demand for mental capacity
and best interest assessment will negate the need for / reduce
costs associated with agency BIA and ad hoc arrangements and ensure
greater quality of provision. |
9.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
9.4.1 |
Alternative Option 1:
To Not Have a Delivery Plan: Adults Care Social Care has duties set out in the Care Act and Mental Health Acts which require a focus on Safeguarding. The Care Quality Commission Local Authority Assurance will specifically look at Adult Social Care approach to Ensuring Safety and due to this a delivery plan is required to mitigate and proactively respond to known risks. |
9.4.2 |
Alternative Option 2:
To not progress a commissioning strategy for best interest assessors:-
Do Nothing - this does leave us with a number of outstanding assessments which would further put which would undoubtedly put the council at risk of unauthorised deprivations.
Recruit more in house BIA - However we may simply have had a one off surge over the past year which may not be sustained and if we were to recruit permanently we might be left with an excess of staff that we may not need in the future. This would be the more expensive of the three options proposed.
Agency
BIA - continue to use agency which we have done
for a three[1]month
period earlier in the year. However, this is a costly option and
does not provide best practice. Independent BIAon a procurement framework – Having a dedicated procurement framework provides consistency of cover |
Decision Maker: Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 18/09/2024 - Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Decision published: 25/09/2024
Effective from: 18/09/2024
Decision:
The Strategic Director of Adult Health and Safeguarding introduced the report which provided an update to the Committee on Adult Care and Wellbeing delivery on the strategy, performance and council plan as well as our preparation for CQC. The reports provided Committee with updates in relation to the following areas:
• Overview of the final ACW self-assessment for CQC assessment for information and comment. • Update on ACW preparations for CQC. • Provide Members with the quarterly update on performance for ACW, including key highlights, mitigations and resolutions. • Update members on current strategy development in ACW, including engagement and collaboration.
This ensures that: • Members have consistent and transparent updates on performance and strategy delivery in ACW. • Our performance, strategy delivery and CQC preparation and self-assessment are visible and in the public domain, as part of our Governance Framework and accountability.
|
|
10.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Adult Health
and Social Care Policy Committee:-
|
10.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
10.3.1 |
Asking
for regular updates and refreshes of the Strategy Delivery Plan,
Our Performance and CQC will keep the Committee, wider
stakeholders, and the public the ability to hold the Council to
account for progress and impact and will provide an additional
mechanism to input to future development. |
10.3.2 |
Noting
the Structure at Appendix 1 enables Committee to understand the
leadership arrangements for delivery upon adult social care and the
strategy. |
10.3.3 |
Noting
the CQC update, including wider assessment preparations and
communications will enable Committee to have oversight and
assurance that Adult Care know themselves and are able to drive
forward service improvements, alongside the assurance that we are
well prepared for the CQC assessment process. |
10.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
10.4.1 |
Alternative Option 1: Do Not
Provide an Update on The Strategy Delivery Plan Progress –
When the Strategy Delivery Plan was approved by Committee in June
2022 the was a commitment to review the plan regularly and by not
reviewing, we would not be meeting that commitment. Due to the
significant amount that has been delivered on the plan, leaving it
as it would make it harder to identify the priorities going
forward. |
10.4.2 |
Alternative Option 2: A different delivery
plan - The real options for the delivery plan are around the
individual elements, which will be worked through as part of the
constituent pieces of work. These will be worked through in
different ways, with many of them resulting in their own future
reports to the Committee. |
10.4.3 |
Alternative Option 3: Do not work in
partnership / collaboratively – It is a statutory requirement
to work in partnership with colleagues across the health, care and
wellbeing system, as set out in the 2021 White Paper. The Statutory
Duty to Involve also requires us to engage and involve people who
use services, and unpaid carers in the design and delivery of care
and wellbeing. We would not be meeting these requirements if we did
not work in meaningful partnership across, they system, and with
all stakeholders. |
10.4.4 |
Alternative Option 4: Do not share the ACW CQC Self-Assessment with partners and in the public domain - To not share the self-assessment and ask for comment would go against the approach and principles we are embedding as business as usual in Adult Care. To have both credibility and relevance, it is vital that this is a report which provides an honest and transparent narrative for adult social care informed by the voices and experiences of staff, partners, commissioned providers, VCSE, and the people who access our services, their families, carers, and those with lived experience. |
Decision Maker: Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 18/09/2024 - Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Decision published: 25/09/2024
Effective from: 18/09/2024
Decision:
The Assistant Director of Finance and Accounting introduced the report which provided the Committee with an update on the following:
· Sheffield City Council is currently facing significant financial challenges, driven by increased service demands, rising costs, and reduced funding. This has resulted in a projected overspend of £34.3 million for the 2024-25 fiscal year, which represents approximately 7% of the net revenue budget. The forecasted overspend is spread across several key service areas, including Housing and Homelessness, Adults and Children's Social Care and SEN home-to-school transport. · While the Council can temporarily avoid issuing a section 114 notice by utilising reserves to balance this year's budget, the financial outlook remains difficult, with limited hope for government relief and growing pressures across the public sector, including the NHS, schools, and higher education institutions. · The Council's approach to addressing these challenges is centred around the "Future Sheffield" programme, a critical initiative aimed at transforming services to create a more sustainable and efficient operating model. This transformation is essential not only to ensure the delivery of statutory services but also to drive initiatives that support city growth and align with the Council's broader strategic goals, as outlined in the Medium-Term Financial Strategy. ·
The need for long-term financial sustainability underscores the
importance of the ongoing transformation efforts. |
|
14.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Adult Health
and Social Care Policy Committee:-
|
14.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
14.3.1 |
To
record formally changes to the Revenue Budget. |
14.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
14.4.1 |
The Council is required to both set a balance budget and to ensure that in-year income and expenditure are balanced. No other alternatives were considered. |
Decision Maker: Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 18/09/2024 - Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Decision published: 25/09/2024
Effective from: 18/09/2024
Decision:
The Strategy and Planning Officer introduced the report which provided information to the Committee on the following:
· Adults Care & Well-being is forecasting an overspend of £9m for 2024/25. Budget Implementation Plans forecast at 94% delivery. Recovery Plan forecast at 80% delivery. · New savings have been identified as mitigation against slippage. ·
Fairer Contributions Policy is undergoing review. |
|
13.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Adult Health
and Social Care Policy Committee:-
|
13.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
13.3.1 |
The
recommendations are provided to enable Members to gain an
understanding of the Adult Health and Social Care budget in
totality, including pressures and current progress with the
recovery plan and scrutinise the actions underway to mitigate
pressures. |
13.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
13.4.1 |
Not applicable – this is an update on actions already agreed. |
Decision Maker: Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 18/09/2024 - Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Decision published: 25/09/2024
Effective from: 18/09/2024
Decision:
The Assistant Director of Living and Ageing well introduced the report to the Committee which provided:
· Further update regarding Living and Ageing Well Short-Term service provision including Occupational Therapy, Equipment, Adapted Housing, City-Wide Care Alarms and Technology Enabled Care services setting out the current position and achievements since the previous report to committee in March 2024. · Activity underway to achieve an accessible, responsive suite of services to improve long term outcomes for local people in the city. · Current commissioning arrangements for the Integrated Community Equipment Loan Service and the options for recommissioning, along with key updates with regards to implementation of national guidance. ·
An update on the City-Wide Care Alarms service including proposals
in relation to charges to customers. |
|
12.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Adult Health
and Social Care Policy Committee:-
|
12.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
12.3.1 |
The
decision to approve an extension of the Integrated Equipment Loan
Services (ICELS) of 18 months provides the time required to
undertake the work regarding development of a new specification
including consultation and engagement regards the future of the
ICELS contract. |
12.3.2 |
This decision will support consultation, and engagement regards the Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG) and discretionary funding policy, enabling us to have clear practice guidance for both people requiring access to the funding and our workforce which is reflective of learning from previous ombudsmen decisions.
|
12.3.3 |
The
performance updates and focused delivery plan gives a structured
approach to the promotion of independent living as well as how the
service is addressing waiting lists and ensuring that progress is
being made and people are supported to wait well. It will also
provide greater accountability and transparency of how we will do
this. |
12.3.4 |
Providing regular updates and latest position of the service and
the key priority workstreams including commissioning arrangements,
future opportunities and performance ensures the Committee, wider
stakeholders, and the public the ability to hold the Council to
account for progress and provide an additional mechanism to input
to future development and oversight. |
12.3.5 |
The
approval to undertake a review of charging for City Wide Care
alarms will enable us to have a more viable business model and
better reflect the increased cost for the upgrade to digital
equipment and ensure that we are delivering value for money whilst
not operating at a loss. |
12.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
12.4.1 |
Alternative Option 1:
· Don’t complete the identified recommendation and actions risking the implementation of service improvements. performance and financial recovery. · This option does not provide the assurances required.
|
|
Alternative Option 2:
Recommended:
· To note the identified recommendations and actions including the implementation of delivery plan for equipment and adaptations performance and financial recovery. · This would provide the assurances required to ensure that we are striving towards a high performing and financially sustainable service |
Decision Maker: Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 18/09/2024 - Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Decision published: 25/09/2024
Effective from: 18/09/2024
Decision:
The Head of Commissioning for Children and Families introduced the report which updated the Committee on the delivery of Sheffield All-Age Emotional and Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy which was previously agreed in spring 2023.
The strategy is split into four themes:
· Theme 1: address the wider determinants of health. · Theme 2: support the emotional and mental health and wellbeing of our children and young people. · Theme 3: provide earlier help to people who need it. · Theme 4: provide effective and good quality care and treatment services.
The report highlighted the key developments across each theme to date.
|
|
11.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Adult Health
and Social Care Policy Committee:-
|
11.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
11.3.1 |
Partners regularly review activity in this area at the Mental
Health, Learning Disabilities, Dementia and Autism, and the
Children and Young People’s Delivery Group, of which
councillors are members. |
11.3.2 |
Approving the refreshed governance arrangements will enables a
system wide collaborative place-based response to achievement of
our vision and aims. It will consolidate strategic oversight to
enable continual development of services to meet the needs of
children and young people, adults and older adults in
Sheffield. |
11.3.3 |
An
annual update to both adults’ and children’s committees
is an appropriate way to update a wider group of councillors and
the public. This review has also provided an opportunity to
consider the most appropriate governance structures for future
delivery of the strategy. |
11.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
11.4.1 |
Alternative Option 1: Delivering the strategy is a key objective for the city’s partners; the only alternative option is not to work together in partnership to improve emotional and mental health and wellbeing. This option is not recommended.
|
Decision Maker: Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 18/09/2024 - Adult Health and Social Care Policy Committee
Decision published: 25/09/2024
Effective from: 18/09/2024
Decision:
The Workforce Development Manager introduced the report which provided an update to the committee on the Adults Care and Wellbeing Equality, Diversity, Inclusion and Social Justice Delivery Plan 2023/241 (EDI Delivery Plan) which was approved by the Health and Social Care Policy Committee in December 2023. It also provided an update on the recommendations by the SACMHA Speak Up Report 2021. The report forms part of the cycle of assurance for the EDI Delivery Plan and shows how as a portfolio we are committed to improving Equality, Diversity, Inclusion and Social Justice (EDI) and delivering upon statutory duties. This update to the EDI Delivery Plan provides assurances regards Public Sector Equalities Duty (PSED).
|
|
8.2 |
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Adult Health
and Social Care Policy Committee:- 1. Endorse progress made with the Adult Care and Wellbeing Equality, Diversity, Inclusion and Social Justice Delivery Plan 2023/24. 2. Notes support of SACHMA to develop community engagement and peer model to support implementation of culturally appropriate care within under-represented communities. 3. Notes ongoing approach to engage with communities, with Care Sector Equalities Engagement Workshops to be organised in 2025 to involve and engage with Voluntary, Faith and Community Sector, Social Care Providers and Academia. 4. Notes progress made to enable delivery of the Skills for Care Social Care Workforce Race Equality Standard (SC-WRES) in Sheffield.
5.
Requests that the Strategic Director of Adult Care and Wellbeing
continues to provide the Committee with updates on progress against
the Delivery Plan on a six-monthly basis, including updates made
based on ongoing learning. |
8.3 |
Reasons for Decision |
8.3.1 |
Equality, diversity, inclusion and social justice are essential
components of social care. Good equality and diversity practices
make sure that the services provided to people are fair and
accessible to everyone. They ensure that people are treated as
equals, that people get the?dignity and respect?they deserve and
that their differences are celebrated. |
|
Our commitment is towards delivering on this ambition. We therefore must continue to listen, learn, and embed equality, equity and inclusion into everything that we do for our residents, visitors, and workforce.
|
|
The Adults Care and Wellbeing Equality, Diversity, Inclusion and Social Justice (EDI) plan was established to provide a framework for delivering on our ambitions and contributing to the Councils Strategic Plan. This report provides an update on our progress against the plan.
|
8.4 |
Alternatives Considered and Rejected |
8.4.1 |
Alternative Option 1:
Do nothing: Adults Care Social Care has duties set out in the Care Act and Mental Health Acts which in particular, require a focus on ensuring equity of experience and services. These forthcoming Care Quality Commission Assurance will specifically look at Adult Social Care approach to Equity of Experience and due to this a delivery plan is required to mitigate and proactively respond to known risks.
|
8.4.2 |
Alternative Option 2:
Consider alternative delivery plan – The Council could review different Delivery Plan options for EDISJ. The current Delivery Plan has been developed following staff engagement sessions and learning from SACMHA speak up reports |
The report seeks approval to vary the proportion of properties advertised to Band D as outlined in section 4.25 of the Allocations Policy. The Report will outline the current position, and rationale, for this decision.
Decision Maker: Director of Housing
Decision published: 24/09/2024
Effective from: 18/09/2024
Decision:
It is recommended that the Interim Director of Housing:
Approves a variation to the proportion of properties advertised to Band D from the current 1 in 4, to 1 in 10, as outlined in section 4.25 of the Allocations Policy to take effect from 26th September 2024.
Agrees that 6 months after the implementation of this decision a data and evidenced based review shall be undertaken by the Council to analyse and assess the impact the variation has made. The outcome of the review shall then be presented back to the Director of Housing (or Interim Director of Housing) for consideration.
Lead officer: Suzanne Allen
Decision Maker: Economic Development and Skills Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 12/09/2024 - Economic Development and Skills Policy Committee
Decision published: 20/09/2024
Effective from: 12/09/2024
Decision Maker: Economic Development and Skills Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 12/09/2024 - Economic Development and Skills Policy Committee
Decision published: 20/09/2024
Effective from: 12/09/2024
Decision Maker: Economic Development and Skills Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 12/09/2024 - Economic Development and Skills Policy Committee
Decision published: 20/09/2024
Effective from: 12/09/2024
Decision Maker: Economic Development and Skills Policy Committee
Made at meeting: 12/09/2024 - Economic Development and Skills Policy Committee
Decision published: 20/09/2024
Effective from: 12/09/2024